This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
taylors lovechild 13 Jan 22 3.06pm | |
---|---|
Vieira's comments in the presser today about wanting experienced players combined with his previous comments last week about Ramsey make me think this deal might not be as unlikely as perhaps it might have been. He is the only experienced player I can think of that we have been linked with recently. As I said before, if he can stay fit then he undoubtedly would improve us. The only other question is can we afford him.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lanzo-Ad Lanzarote 13 Jan 22 3.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by taylors lovechild
Vieira's comments in the presser today about wanting experienced players combined with his previous comments last week about Ramsey make me think this deal might not be as unlikely as perhaps it might have been. He is the only experienced player I can think of that we have been linked with recently. As I said before, if he can stay fit then he undoubtedly would improve us. The only other question is can we afford him. In theory he could have Wilfs wages if we sold him for 15m, i think every footballer knows that the real big money is over, when contracts expire
“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dreamwaverider London 13 Jan 22 4.03pm | |
---|---|
I reckon the reason they are offering 75% of wages is because he is not fit to play.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sydtheeagle England 13 Jan 22 7.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dreamwaverider
I reckon the reason they are offering 75% of wages is because he is not fit to play. Clubs do this sort of thing all the time in major sports when they want to move a player on so not sure why so many here don't seem to understand the reasoning. It's not at all uncommon. There is no need for conspiracy theories. First, no club wants an unhappy player who can become a disruptive influence on their squad. We already know from reports that the Juventus squad isn't happy with the way Ramsey has been treated and the players have asked Allegri to let him return to first-team training. From the club's point of view, far better to remove that sort of problem altogether, no matter the cost, than let the discontent fester. Secondly, if communications between manager and player have broken down so completely that the player has been exiled to train with the kids then it's past the point of no return. He's not coming back into the fold and you're going to have to bite the bullet and pay him until his contract runs out one way or another. So that being the case, most of us would rather save £25 on the pound if we could, once it's passed the point of no return. Third, football clubs broker deals between each other all the time, many aspects of which never see the light of day. Maybe Juve has an interest in one of our younger players and as part of the Ramsay wage deal, there's a gentleman's agreement that we give them the right of first refusal on him if and when he ever comes onto the market. Who knows? Remember, you all think that getting Juve to pay 75% of Ramsay's wages is a big win for us. But you're ignoring the fact that Juve may well think getting shot of him at any cost at all is a big win for them. My point is, there's nothing sensational here. There's nothing unusual in the structure of the proposed deal. The sort of clubs who could afford Ramsay's wages (the big six) have no interest in him and therefore if Juve wants rid of him as badly as they do, they're accepting that it'll have to be to a club who can't afford him, ergo they're going to have to subsidise the deal. Known facts: Ramsey wants to return to the Premier League. He wants to live in London. He is wanted by Vieira. Juve has accepted the reality of funding a transfer (or loan) that they want to happen as well. It looks to me like there's a pretty good chance he'll arrive at Selhurst in the not-too-distant future.
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Crystal Keith Chatham, Kent 13 Jan 22 7.59pm | |
---|---|
DOMINOES - REFRESHING THE PACK? Lots of what ifs but it could fall into place for us to get a wonderful midfield genius and a young energetic striker this month. Maybe the decision on Mateta can be made later in the window, dependent on how he does in the next couple of games and if the transfers work out. Backstop, consider RLC if he is still available in the summer? from Crystal Keith
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Henry of Peckham Eton Mess 13 Jan 22 10.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dreamwaverider
I reckon the reason they are offering 75% of wages is because he is not fit to play. He'd have to be fit to play ... for how long is another question?
Denial is not just a river in Egypt |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wilbraham413 14 Jan 22 3.48am | |
---|---|
PV has done well with transfers, and he seems to be scouting many areas at once. If this turns out to be true, I would trust that he knows what he's doing. Ramsey seems like a pretty high upside player for us. The downside is if we pay too high wages, and he's hurt all the time.
2017 Feb. (Van Aanholt) Palace 1 - 0 Middlesboro |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dreamwaverider London 14 Jan 22 8.17am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by sydtheeagle
Clubs do this sort of thing all the time in major sports when they want to move a player on so not sure why so many here don't seem to understand the reasoning. It's not at all uncommon. There is no need for conspiracy theories. First, no club wants an unhappy player who can become a disruptive influence on their squad. We already know from reports that the Juventus squad isn't happy with the way Ramsey has been treated and the players have asked Allegri to let him return to first-team training. From the club's point of view, far better to remove that sort of problem altogether, no matter the cost, than let the discontent fester. Secondly, if communications between manager and player have broken down so completely that the player has been exiled to train with the kids then it's past the point of no return. He's not coming back into the fold and you're going to have to bite the bullet and pay him until his contract runs out one way or another. So that being the case, most of us would rather save £25 on the pound if we could, once it's passed the point of no return. Third, football clubs broker deals between each other all the time, many aspects of which never see the light of day. Maybe Juve has an interest in one of our younger players and as part of the Ramsay wage deal, there's a gentleman's agreement that we give them the right of first refusal on him if and when he ever comes onto the market. Who knows? Remember, you all think that getting Juve to pay 75% of Ramsay's wages is a big win for us. But you're ignoring the fact that Juve may well think getting shot of him at any cost at all is a big win for them. My point is, there's nothing sensational here. There's nothing unusual in the structure of the proposed deal. The sort of clubs who could afford Ramsay's wages (the big six) have no interest in him and therefore if Juve wants rid of him as badly as they do, they're accepting that it'll have to be to a club who can't afford him, ergo they're going to have to subsidise the deal. Known facts: Ramsey wants to return to the Premier League. He wants to live in London. He is wanted by Vieira. Juve has accepted the reality of funding a transfer (or loan) that they want to happen as well. It looks to me like there's a pretty good chance he'll arrive at Selhurst in the not-too-distant future. cheers syd. Fantastic response. Much appreciated. I hope we get him.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
topcat Holmesdale / Surbiton 14 Jan 22 11.37am | |
---|---|
I suspect that it is bound for a return to Arsenal but would welcome him here if the money was right.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 14 Jan 22 12.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by topcat
I suspect that it is bound for a return to Arsenal but would welcome him here if the money was right. I suspect that Juve are hoping that someone comes in with a better offer that Juve paying most of his wages. This will probably be a deal that happens late on and only if some one else doesn't offer better terms.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Painter Croydon 14 Jan 22 2.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wilbraham413
PV has done well with transfers, and he seems to be scouting many areas at once. If this turns out to be true, I would trust that he knows what he's doing. Ramsey seems like a pretty high upside player for us. The downside is if we pay too high wages, and he's hurt all the time. You seem to think Vieira goes out scouting players. He has nothing to do with scouting or transfers, it’s done by Freeman, when a player is found, Vieira opinion is sort.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
thai-eagle chiang mai 19 Jan 22 4.39am | |
---|---|
A brilliant player on his day, but do we need another sicknote in our squad?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.