This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Ali_Campbell New Addington 14 Mar 21 6.55pm | |
---|---|
Agree - I think there is a bigger picture behind the scenes with; - Stabilise the club financially and reduce the wage structure of the club All this is only possible if we are in the Premier League. This is the clubs ambition and our playing style has sacrificed as a result. Even more so during a pandemic. Also.....we seem to be missing the progress under Roy despite the biggest negative spend in the prem in his four year spell. - minus 11m net spend in Roy’s reign Anyone would think the clubs going backward!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
doombear Too far from Selhurst Park 14 Mar 21 7.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ali_Campbell
Agree - I think there is a bigger picture behind the scenes with; - Stabilise the club financially and reduce the wage structure of the club All this is only possible if we are in the Premier League. This is the clubs ambition and our playing style has sacrificed as a result. Even more so during a pandemic. Also.....we seem to be missing the progress under Roy despite the biggest negative spend in the prem in his four year spell. - minus 11m net spend in Roy’s reign Anyone would think the clubs going backward!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ketteridge Brighton 14 Mar 21 8.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ali_Campbell
Agree - I think there is a bigger picture behind the scenes with; - Stabilise the club financially and reduce the wage structure of the club All this is only possible if we are in the Premier League. This is the clubs ambition and our playing style has sacrificed as a result. Even more so during a pandemic. Also.....we seem to be missing the progress under Roy despite the biggest negative spend in the prem in his four year spell. - minus 11m net spend in Roy’s reign Anyone would think the clubs going backward! Good post , I know this is a negative way of looking it but everyone bar the big 6 and Everton will at some point be relegated , the point being clubs like West Ham and Newcastle are more likely to come back quickly then the likes of Palace, Brighton, Wolves , Watford, Bournemouth etc. So how do we get to that point , if we had gone down a few years back we would have pretty much had a slightly enlarged fan based and some good memoires . If we go down now we have the academy, given the amount of quality players that come from South London that is pretty important, I’ve being getting text from a gooner mate this afternoon about Smith-Rowe being the Croydon-De Bruyne so if the next generation Smith-Rowe or Loftus-cheeks are playing for Palace not a bad thing.
One supporter of hacking argued that without it "you will do away with the courage and pluck of the game, and I will be bound to bring over a lot of Frenchmen who would beat you with a week's practice -Blackheath secretary at first meeting of the F.A |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pete53 Hassocks 15 Mar 21 9.49am | |
---|---|
Yes it looks as if safety is only a point or two away, and may already have been achieved. Similar to last season when I seem to remember the win against Brighton gave us a points total that would eventually not be superceded by any of the bottom three.Then there were still 10 or so games to play just as there are now. I have to say I am glad there is a three week gap until the next game.I am finding it very hard watching us at the moment. Perhaps our players will come back refreshed and, with safety close to being assured, play with a little more freedom and adventure. And, hopefully, there will be no repeat of the tail end of last season. Edited by Pete53 (15 Mar 2021 9.51am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 15 Mar 21 5.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Elphers40
I concur 7 points is not to be sniffed at. But watching us play this year has Ben bloody hard going. we are Palace. Bloody hard going for as long as i can remember.
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jeeagles 16 Mar 21 12.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by doombear
That was achieved last year (39 pts) NOT this. Exactly. It's a terrible argument. From 29 games onwards last year we picked up 4 points. Similar noises were being made about our points tally with so many games left, but no one kept an eye on who we had to play. In the reverse fixtures against the sides we have got left to play I think we picked up 8 points. To get 40 points. I still use the rule you have to draw against the 10 bottom half teams away and beat them all at home. Those are your critical games, everything else is a bonus. On that objective criteria, we are looking at getting 5 more points (Sheffield Utd 1, Southampton 1, Arsenal 3 as things stand). Brace yourself for a frustrating run in. My forecast is cynical, but has a sound basis to it. However, its looking like we'll get between 41 and 45 points. In a season with no cup run or real signs that we are building anything for the future it is another disappointing season where we have regressed again.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
midlandspalace kidderminster 16 Mar 21 1.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jeeagles
And here is the nub of the disagreement. Many of us, including me, would be more than happy to achieve between 41 and 45 points in the top division every season. We may not be going forward, but we are not regressing either. There are worse places to be than in the middle of the top division for what will soon be nine successive seasons, with a cup final thrown in too. Any sustainable improvement from here would require hundreds of millions of investment to compete. It is not going to happen.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jeeagles 16 Mar 21 1.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by midlandspalace
And here is the nub of the disagreement. Many of us, including me, would be more than happy to achieve between 41 and 45 points in the top division every season. We may not be going forward, but we are not regressing either. There are worse places to be than in the middle of the top division for what will soon be nine successive seasons, with a cup final thrown in too. Any sustainable improvement from here would require hundreds of millions of investment to compete. It is not going to happen. The issue is, the cup final was now 5 years ago. That's when we peaked. Many sides have a rocky season after they get to a cup final like we did, getting to the cup final and staying up can be regarded as a decent achievement. Finishing 11th in Roy's first season was a good finish too. Those years were when we hit the top of the curve. Many think we are still there and that complacency has allowed the regression to kick in unnoticed. I'm not really asking for much more than 45 points, and with the squad we have 11th to 14th place finish of around 50 points should be reasonable to achievable. That's not even a mid table finish. If we consistently finish around there we should get some memorable games, a cup run, and perhaps break the top ten once every few years if we are lucky, which would be fantastic. Probably nit picking, but I cant see what's sustainable about spending hundreds of millions.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
esox lucius Deal 16 Mar 21 3.44pm | |
---|---|
I feel that unless the club has the extremely good fortune to be taken over by some wealthy billionaire (very unlikely) then we have reached our peak with with a top half finish tantalisingly just out of reach. 45ish points is our max.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 16 Mar 21 3.57pm | |
---|---|
In terms of revenue the Premier has higher income than any other league - and we're mid-table and safe. On most metrics that's pretty good surely?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eaglecoops CR3 16 Mar 21 3.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by esox lucius
I feel that unless the club has the extremely good fortune to be taken over by some wealthy billionaire (very unlikely) then we have reached our peak with with a top half finish tantalisingly just out of reach. 45ish points is our max. As some have explained in detail it is irrelevant having wealthy owners. It is to do with your ability to earn income as to whether you can spend money on players. Wealthy owners can buy you a new ground but you are looking at 5-10 years before that is done and the size of the club reaches the critical mass where you can start competing for top players in the transfer window. We are, along with at least another 10-12 teams in the PL just treading water and nothing really will change. The big teams bias created by FFP has sown up the league in terms of a realistic chance of competing at the top level by making it impossible to do another Chelsea or Man City. Leicester is the only exception to the rule and they have semi broken into the big time and credit to them for doing so. If the big teams truly get their way they will not even have to qualify for the CL and their guaranteed £100m for getting there will of course cement their ability to buy the top players. In short, unless the FFP rules are changed we are never going to become a top team.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Palace Old Geezer Midhurst 16 Mar 21 4.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by esox lucius
I feel that unless the club has the extremely good fortune to be taken over by some wealthy billionaire (very unlikely) then we have reached our peak with with a top half finish tantalisingly just out of reach. 45ish points is our max. Not just any old wealthy billionaire though. Should at least show some interest in the game generally, if not Palace in particular. Too many just want to make a quick buck and move on with little or no regard to the problems left behind.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.