You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > New Attorney General "Suella" Braverman
November 22 2024 1.21am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

New Attorney General "Suella" Braverman

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 5 of 11 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

  

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 15 Feb 20 8.56pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by cpfc_chap

The compromise was out there and the mps didn't vote for Mays soft Brexit! You can't please everyone and remain mps didn't obviously want to compromise it as was to stop Brexit that was your remain mps stance.

This was a text from one of my few remainer friends

I hope you’re right & all the fears I have about leaving the EU won’t come to fruition. I’m a remainer not a remoaner so as a right minded & realistic human being I have to accept Brexit is here to stay & accept it graciously. I’m all for a well rounded argument or debate but the wallies on BOTH sides that insist on just being ignorant, blind sided & unpleasant about other people’s views can go swivel! &#128513; I’m British & proud! &#127468;&#127463; (still not sure it’s the right decision though &#128514

Shame people like yourself can't accept the will of the people...

Edited by cpfc_chap (15 Feb 2020 3.48pm)

What are you banging on about Brexit for again?

My comments have nothing directly to do with Brexit. Brexit was a symptom of the problem I described and not the cause of it.

Brexit has happened. That battle was lost but the war continues. Now we move onto a new phase. The troops have been withdrawn for some R & R and the generals conferring on strategy. For the time being other issues demand attention.

What you Brexiteers need to accept is that those who believe in the EU, and the UK's need to belong to it, are just as entitled to their views as you are to yours. As I am quite sure that Farage and his minions would not just have laid down and surrendered if the referendum result had been ever so slightly different why on earth do you expect anything different from people like me?

Once we show each other due respect we can start to heal these divisions. Treating the 2016 48% (which apparently grew to well over 50% by 2019) as people whose views can just be disregarded is a prime example of what is wrong.

So your remainer friend talked some sense. Pity you don't.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 15 Feb 20 9.06pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

What are you banging on about Brexit for again?

My comments have nothing directly to do with Brexit. Brexit was a symptom of the problem I described and not the cause of it.

Brexit has happened. That battle was lost but the war continues. Now we move onto a new phase. The troops have been withdrawn for some R & R and the generals conferring on strategy. For the time being other issues demand attention.

What you Brexiteers need to accept is that those who believe in the EU, and the UK's need to belong to it, are just as entitled to their views as you are to yours. As I am quite sure that Farage and his minions would not just have laid down and surrendered if the referendum result had been ever so slightly different why on earth do you expect anything different from people like me?

Once we show each other due respect we can start to heal these divisions. Treating the 2016 48% (which apparently grew to well over 50% by 2019) as people whose views can just be disregarded is a prime example of what is wrong.

So your remainer friend talked some sense. Pity you don't.

The 48 did and do get respect.
The 52 dont and havent from the likes of you.
Rattling on about how grave the situation is and how revolution will get us back in.
You do talk some b o l l o x

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 15 Feb 20 9.14pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

The 48 did and do get respect.
The 52 dont and havent from the likes of you.
Rattling on about how grave the situation is and how revolution will get us back in.
You do talk some b o l l o x

That's nothing but "bollox"!!

There won't be, and I am not advocating, a revolution. Whatever happens will be achieved democratically and in the fullness of time.

In what way have the wishes of the 48% (which seemingly grew to be a majority) been respected? Attempting to push through a hard Brexit is all you need to know that no respect whatsoever has been shown. None.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 15 Feb 20 9.29pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That's nothing but "bollox"!!

There won't be, and I am not advocating, a revolution. Whatever happens will be achieved democratically and in the fullness of time.

In what way have the wishes of the 48% (which seemingly grew to be a majority) been respected? Attempting to push through a hard Brexit is all you need to know that no respect whatsoever has been shown. None.

But what’s happened was achieved democratically.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cpfc_chap Flag koh samui 15 Feb 20 11.16pm Send a Private Message to cpfc_chap Add cpfc_chap as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

What are you banging on about Brexit for again?

My comments have nothing directly to do with Brexit. Brexit was a symptom of the problem I described and not the cause of it.

Brexit has happened. That battle was lost but the war continues. Now we move onto a new phase. The troops have been withdrawn for some R & R and the generals conferring on strategy. For the time being other issues demand attention.

What you Brexiteers need to accept is that those who believe in the EU, and the UK's need to belong to it, are just as entitled to their views as you are to yours. As I am quite sure that Farage and his minions would not just have laid down and surrendered if the referendum result had been ever so slightly different why on earth do you expect anything different from people like me?

Once we show each other due respect we can start to heal these divisions. Treating the 2016 48% (which apparently grew to well over 50% by 2019) as people whose views can just be disregarded is a prime example of what is wrong.

So your remainer friend talked some sense. Pity you don't.

That's why the leave vote won the election for the Tory party! Pity you can't move on...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 15 Feb 20 11.18pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

But what’s happened was achieved democratically.

Do we have a democracy? I used to think so but now I am not so sure. When even an 80 seat majority can be achieved by an only 43.6% vote share something seems very wrong to me. People need to know their vote matters and their opinions taken into account.

Referendum's in the UK are not part of our system. Only Parliament deciding to respect the result gave it any legitimacy. What happened subsequently was a failure of our democracy because Parliament failed to act as it should when it had the chance to outvote the Tory minority government. A government which acted unlawfully and was then forced by the Supreme Court to hand the initiative back to Parliament.

Brexit was Corbyn's failure and not Johnson's success. As he was never an enthusiast for the EU I cannot help but wonder if he was scheming all along but I don't think he is that clever.

I have reached the conclusion that although Brexit happened via our system it was done via a series of flawed events that all conspired together to deliver a result that is not just, in my opinion, not in our interests but also, very probably, not actually wanted by a majority of the people in the months prior to it happening. That people voted for a government prepared to end the battle was much more to do with war weariness, and a strong dislike of Corbyn, than any reasoned opinion on the merits of the EU.

I have long argued that we wouldn't have a properly functioning democracy until we adopted proportional representation. The events of the last few years have confirmed that. If we had used PR then Brexit would not be happening and democracy would truly have produced the result.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 15 Feb 20 11.19pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by cpfc_chap

That's why the leave vote won the election for the Tory party! Pity you can't move on...

Read my reply to "Teddy". That answers you too.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cpfc_chap Flag koh samui 15 Feb 20 11.44pm Send a Private Message to cpfc_chap Add cpfc_chap as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle



Do we have a democracy? I used to think so but now I am not so sure. When even an 80 seat majority can be achieved by an only 43.6% vote share something seems very wrong to me. People need to know their vote matters and their opinions taken into account.

Referendum's in the UK are not part of our system. Only Parliament deciding to respect the result gave it any legitimacy. What happened subsequently was a failure of our democracy because Parliament failed to act as it should when it had the chance to outvote the Tory minority government. A government which acted unlawfully and was then forced by the Supreme Court to hand the initiative back to Parliament.

Brexit was Corbyn's failure and not Johnson's success. As he was never an enthusiast for the EU I cannot help but wonder if he was scheming all along but I don't think he is that clever.

I have reached the conclusion that although Brexit happened via our system it was done via a series of flawed events that all conspired together to deliver a result that is not just, in my opinion, not in our interests but also, very probably, not actually wanted by a majority of the people in the months prior to it happening. That people voted for a government prepared to end the battle was much more to do with war weariness, and a strong dislike of Corbyn, than any reasoned opinion on the merits of the EU.

I have long argued that we wouldn't have a properly functioning democracy until we adopted proportional representation. The events of the last few years have confirmed that. If we had used PR then Brexit would not be happening and democracy would truly have produced the result.

It's been working this way for many a year or would you prefer a 2 party system where the first to 50.1% wins?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 15 Feb 20 11.58pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Do we have a democracy? I used to think so but now I am not so sure. When even an 80 seat majority can be achieved by an only 43.6% vote share something seems very wrong to me. People need to know their vote matters and their opinions taken into account.

Referendum's in the UK are not part of our system. Only Parliament deciding to respect the result gave it any legitimacy. What happened subsequently was a failure of our democracy because Parliament failed to act as it should when it had the chance to outvote the Tory minority government. A government which acted unlawfully and was then forced by the Supreme Court to hand the initiative back to Parliament.

Brexit was Corbyn's failure and not Johnson's success. As he was never an enthusiast for the EU I cannot help but wonder if he was scheming all along but I don't think he is that clever.

I have reached the conclusion that although Brexit happened via our system it was done via a series of flawed events that all conspired together to deliver a result that is not just, in my opinion, not in our interests but also, very probably, not actually wanted by a majority of the people in the months prior to it happening. That people voted for a government prepared to end the battle was much more to do with war weariness, and a strong dislike of Corbyn, than any reasoned opinion on the merits of the EU.

I have long argued that we wouldn't have a properly functioning democracy until we adopted proportional representation. The events of the last few years have confirmed that. If we had used PR then Brexit would not be happening and democracy would truly have produced the result.

Since 1973 the UK has averaged one referendum every four and a half years so it could be argued they are part of the system.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 16 Feb 20 6.24am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That's nothing but "bollox"!!

There won't be, and I am not advocating, a revolution. Whatever happens will be achieved democratically and in the fullness of time.

In what way have the wishes of the 48% (which seemingly grew to be a majority) been respected? Attempting to push through a hard Brexit is all you need to know that no respect whatsoever has been shown. None.

Theresa may offered the 48 a sensible deal.
Which would not have gone well with hard bits of the 52 but your democratically elected representatives (mainly labour) knocked it back.
Now moaning about a 'hard' brexit is a bit ironic.
Did you back May's deal?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 16 Feb 20 9.49am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Since 1973 the UK has averaged one referendum every four and a half years so it could be argued they are part of the system.

Mostly on the devolution of responsibility away from Westminster and none binding. Any efforts to involve the people, and hold consultations on regional issues, are not unreasonable but Parliament is where decisions must be made.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 16 Feb 20 9.51am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by cpfc_chap

It's been working this way for many a year or would you prefer a 2 party system where the first to 50.1% wins?

No. I would prefer a multi party system in which many strands of opinion can have their voices recognised and their views taken into account in due proportion to the numbers holding them.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 5 of 11 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > New Attorney General "Suella" Braverman