This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 15 Feb 20 8.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cpfc_chap
The compromise was out there and the mps didn't vote for Mays soft Brexit! You can't please everyone and remain mps didn't obviously want to compromise it as was to stop Brexit that was your remain mps stance. This was a text from one of my few remainer friends I hope you’re right & all the fears I have about leaving the EU won’t come to fruition. I’m a remainer not a remoaner so as a right minded & realistic human being I have to accept Brexit is here to stay & accept it graciously. I’m all for a well rounded argument or debate but the wallies on BOTH sides that insist on just being ignorant, blind sided & unpleasant about other people’s views can go swivel! 😁 I’m British & proud! 🇬🇧 (still not sure it’s the right decision though 😂 Shame people like yourself can't accept the will of the people... Edited by cpfc_chap (15 Feb 2020 3.48pm) What are you banging on about Brexit for again? My comments have nothing directly to do with Brexit. Brexit was a symptom of the problem I described and not the cause of it. Brexit has happened. That battle was lost but the war continues. Now we move onto a new phase. The troops have been withdrawn for some R & R and the generals conferring on strategy. For the time being other issues demand attention. What you Brexiteers need to accept is that those who believe in the EU, and the UK's need to belong to it, are just as entitled to their views as you are to yours. As I am quite sure that Farage and his minions would not just have laid down and surrendered if the referendum result had been ever so slightly different why on earth do you expect anything different from people like me? Once we show each other due respect we can start to heal these divisions. Treating the 2016 48% (which apparently grew to well over 50% by 2019) as people whose views can just be disregarded is a prime example of what is wrong. So your remainer friend talked some sense. Pity you don't.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 15 Feb 20 9.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
What are you banging on about Brexit for again? My comments have nothing directly to do with Brexit. Brexit was a symptom of the problem I described and not the cause of it. Brexit has happened. That battle was lost but the war continues. Now we move onto a new phase. The troops have been withdrawn for some R & R and the generals conferring on strategy. For the time being other issues demand attention. What you Brexiteers need to accept is that those who believe in the EU, and the UK's need to belong to it, are just as entitled to their views as you are to yours. As I am quite sure that Farage and his minions would not just have laid down and surrendered if the referendum result had been ever so slightly different why on earth do you expect anything different from people like me? Once we show each other due respect we can start to heal these divisions. Treating the 2016 48% (which apparently grew to well over 50% by 2019) as people whose views can just be disregarded is a prime example of what is wrong. So your remainer friend talked some sense. Pity you don't. The 48 did and do get respect.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 15 Feb 20 9.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
The 48 did and do get respect. That's nothing but "bollox"!! There won't be, and I am not advocating, a revolution. Whatever happens will be achieved democratically and in the fullness of time. In what way have the wishes of the 48% (which seemingly grew to be a majority) been respected? Attempting to push through a hard Brexit is all you need to know that no respect whatsoever has been shown. None.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 15 Feb 20 9.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
That's nothing but "bollox"!! There won't be, and I am not advocating, a revolution. Whatever happens will be achieved democratically and in the fullness of time. In what way have the wishes of the 48% (which seemingly grew to be a majority) been respected? Attempting to push through a hard Brexit is all you need to know that no respect whatsoever has been shown. None. But what’s happened was achieved democratically.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cpfc_chap koh samui 15 Feb 20 11.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
What are you banging on about Brexit for again? My comments have nothing directly to do with Brexit. Brexit was a symptom of the problem I described and not the cause of it. Brexit has happened. That battle was lost but the war continues. Now we move onto a new phase. The troops have been withdrawn for some R & R and the generals conferring on strategy. For the time being other issues demand attention. What you Brexiteers need to accept is that those who believe in the EU, and the UK's need to belong to it, are just as entitled to their views as you are to yours. As I am quite sure that Farage and his minions would not just have laid down and surrendered if the referendum result had been ever so slightly different why on earth do you expect anything different from people like me? Once we show each other due respect we can start to heal these divisions. Treating the 2016 48% (which apparently grew to well over 50% by 2019) as people whose views can just be disregarded is a prime example of what is wrong. So your remainer friend talked some sense. Pity you don't. That's why the leave vote won the election for the Tory party! Pity you can't move on...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 15 Feb 20 11.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
But what’s happened was achieved democratically. Do we have a democracy? I used to think so but now I am not so sure. When even an 80 seat majority can be achieved by an only 43.6% vote share something seems very wrong to me. People need to know their vote matters and their opinions taken into account. Referendum's in the UK are not part of our system. Only Parliament deciding to respect the result gave it any legitimacy. What happened subsequently was a failure of our democracy because Parliament failed to act as it should when it had the chance to outvote the Tory minority government. A government which acted unlawfully and was then forced by the Supreme Court to hand the initiative back to Parliament. Brexit was Corbyn's failure and not Johnson's success. As he was never an enthusiast for the EU I cannot help but wonder if he was scheming all along but I don't think he is that clever. I have reached the conclusion that although Brexit happened via our system it was done via a series of flawed events that all conspired together to deliver a result that is not just, in my opinion, not in our interests but also, very probably, not actually wanted by a majority of the people in the months prior to it happening. That people voted for a government prepared to end the battle was much more to do with war weariness, and a strong dislike of Corbyn, than any reasoned opinion on the merits of the EU. I have long argued that we wouldn't have a properly functioning democracy until we adopted proportional representation. The events of the last few years have confirmed that. If we had used PR then Brexit would not be happening and democracy would truly have produced the result.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 15 Feb 20 11.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cpfc_chap
That's why the leave vote won the election for the Tory party! Pity you can't move on... Read my reply to "Teddy". That answers you too.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cpfc_chap koh samui 15 Feb 20 11.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Referendum's in the UK are not part of our system. Only Parliament deciding to respect the result gave it any legitimacy. What happened subsequently was a failure of our democracy because Parliament failed to act as it should when it had the chance to outvote the Tory minority government. A government which acted unlawfully and was then forced by the Supreme Court to hand the initiative back to Parliament. Brexit was Corbyn's failure and not Johnson's success. As he was never an enthusiast for the EU I cannot help but wonder if he was scheming all along but I don't think he is that clever. I have reached the conclusion that although Brexit happened via our system it was done via a series of flawed events that all conspired together to deliver a result that is not just, in my opinion, not in our interests but also, very probably, not actually wanted by a majority of the people in the months prior to it happening. That people voted for a government prepared to end the battle was much more to do with war weariness, and a strong dislike of Corbyn, than any reasoned opinion on the merits of the EU. I have long argued that we wouldn't have a properly functioning democracy until we adopted proportional representation. The events of the last few years have confirmed that. If we had used PR then Brexit would not be happening and democracy would truly have produced the result. It's been working this way for many a year or would you prefer a 2 party system where the first to 50.1% wins?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 15 Feb 20 11.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Do we have a democracy? I used to think so but now I am not so sure. When even an 80 seat majority can be achieved by an only 43.6% vote share something seems very wrong to me. People need to know their vote matters and their opinions taken into account. Referendum's in the UK are not part of our system. Only Parliament deciding to respect the result gave it any legitimacy. What happened subsequently was a failure of our democracy because Parliament failed to act as it should when it had the chance to outvote the Tory minority government. A government which acted unlawfully and was then forced by the Supreme Court to hand the initiative back to Parliament. Brexit was Corbyn's failure and not Johnson's success. As he was never an enthusiast for the EU I cannot help but wonder if he was scheming all along but I don't think he is that clever. I have reached the conclusion that although Brexit happened via our system it was done via a series of flawed events that all conspired together to deliver a result that is not just, in my opinion, not in our interests but also, very probably, not actually wanted by a majority of the people in the months prior to it happening. That people voted for a government prepared to end the battle was much more to do with war weariness, and a strong dislike of Corbyn, than any reasoned opinion on the merits of the EU. I have long argued that we wouldn't have a properly functioning democracy until we adopted proportional representation. The events of the last few years have confirmed that. If we had used PR then Brexit would not be happening and democracy would truly have produced the result. Since 1973 the UK has averaged one referendum every four and a half years so it could be argued they are part of the system.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 16 Feb 20 6.24am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
That's nothing but "bollox"!! There won't be, and I am not advocating, a revolution. Whatever happens will be achieved democratically and in the fullness of time. In what way have the wishes of the 48% (which seemingly grew to be a majority) been respected? Attempting to push through a hard Brexit is all you need to know that no respect whatsoever has been shown. None. Theresa may offered the 48 a sensible deal.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Feb 20 9.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Since 1973 the UK has averaged one referendum every four and a half years so it could be argued they are part of the system. Mostly on the devolution of responsibility away from Westminster and none binding. Any efforts to involve the people, and hold consultations on regional issues, are not unreasonable but Parliament is where decisions must be made.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Feb 20 9.51am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cpfc_chap
It's been working this way for many a year or would you prefer a 2 party system where the first to 50.1% wins? No. I would prefer a multi party system in which many strands of opinion can have their voices recognised and their views taken into account in due proportion to the numbers holding them.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.