This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Invalid user 2019 06 Nov 19 2.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
I want to know if it turns out that someone had about 15 plugs from one socket and the fire was caused by a short - will it still be everyone else's fault? Particularly if it was then delayed in being reported? Possibly the above.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 06 Nov 19 9.55am | |
---|---|
How or why that fire started in the flat is not the issue. Fires happen. Faulty wiring happens. Just a fact of life. The only issue is why that building was clad in that material. That is why all those poor people died. And what is being pushed to one side. Brushed under the carpet. All this froth around the fire-brigade and the prosecutions of the people trying to scrounge in the aftermath is pure BS. Classic political distraction techniques and I suspect one that our entire political class is embracing. Playing up to ALL of our collective worse sensibilities. We need to acknowledge that. Our venal, self-aggrandizing political elite at its very worst. No cladding, no deaths. It is as simple as that. The fire-brigade response was perfectly in line with the known 'facts' prior to the incident getting underway. Certainly worthy of retrospection but still a matter of internal LFB consideration. Not a public enquiry and certainly not before the main question with regards to how that cladding came to be in place to start with. Cladding. Cladding. Cladding. That is it. That is why that tower block was turned into a torch. Why was it up there? Who passed it as being safe? What were the process? The policy? I am firmly of the Right. Make no bones about that. But my political antennae are twitching away like anything because this stinks and goes well beyond the usual slings and arrows of the 'game'. With politicians from all sides of the divide playing their part in ensuring that the cladding question is not being given the absolute prominence it deserves. That is the rot in all of this. Forget everything else. All merely window dressing. The key lays in the process as to why that cladding went up on that building.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 06 Nov 19 11.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
How or why that fire started in the flat is not the issue. Fires happen. Faulty wiring happens. Just a fact of life. The only issue is why that building was clad in that material. That is why all those poor people died. And what is being pushed to one side. Brushed under the carpet. All this froth around the fire-brigade and the prosecutions of the people trying to scrounge in the aftermath is pure BS. Classic political distraction techniques and I suspect one that our entire political class is embracing. Playing up to ALL of our collective worse sensibilities. We need to acknowledge that. Our venal, self-aggrandizing political elite at its very worst. No cladding, no deaths. It is as simple as that. The fire-brigade response was perfectly in line with the known 'facts' prior to the incident getting underway. Certainly worthy of retrospection but still a matter of internal LFB consideration. Not a public enquiry and certainly not before the main question with regards to how that cladding came to be in place to start with. Cladding. Cladding. Cladding. That is it. That is why that tower block was turned into a torch. Why was it up there? Who passed it as being safe? What were the process? The policy? I am firmly of the Right. Make no bones about that. But my political antennae are twitching away like anything because this stinks and goes well beyond the usual slings and arrows of the 'game'. With politicians from all sides of the divide playing their part in ensuring that the cladding question is not being given the absolute prominence it deserves. That is the rot in all of this. Forget everything else. All merely window dressing. The key lays in the process as to why that cladding went up on that building. The enquiry is going to get to the building side of it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 06 Nov 19 2.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ex hibitionist
it was a tragic accident that happened because of the cladding, you are bringing race into it, isn't the issue the rich crapping on the poor ... 'evil white men?!' … what has the racial (and sexual) demographic of the culprits or victims got to do with this? there is a clear undertone to your comment which betrays some fantasy idea that the complaint is based in the inability of a coloured underclass who can't afford a better place to live - maybe they should be grateful they had any cladding at all, maybe if there's a similar fire that kills a load of plumbers from Essex you'll be able to see more clearly. Doreen Lawrence brought race into it along with many other talking heads from various "communities"......and the media ran with it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ex hibitionist Hastings 06 Nov 19 7.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
The enquiry is going to get to the building side of it. … and that process involves smearing the LFB first before a possible two year delay until the decision makers are scrutinised - and well done Matov - abs spot on.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 06 Nov 19 7.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ex hibitionist
… and that process involves smearing the LFB first before a possible two year delay until the decision makers are scrutinised - and well done Matov - abs spot on. The LFB made mistakes.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sickboy Deal or Croydon 06 Nov 19 8.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
The LFB made mistakes. Do tower blocks without cladding have to have the stay put advice rescinded?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 06 Nov 19 8.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by sickboy
Do tower blocks without cladding have to have the stay put advice rescinded? No they didnt clad the building or set it on fire.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sickboy Deal or Croydon 06 Nov 19 8.21pm | |
---|---|
All emergency services do their best in situations most of the public would s*** themselves in.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sickboy Deal or Croydon 06 Nov 19 8.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
No they didnt clad the building or set it on fire. Easy to say they made mistakes on the night.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 06 Nov 19 8.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by sickboy
All emergency services do their best in situations most of the public would s*** themselves in. I've got nothing but respect and admiration for all of these people.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 06 Nov 19 8.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by sickboy
Easy to say they made mistakes on the night. Yep all spot on. Look, uncomfortable truth is that when you are in a situation like that you need to use your common sense. What Mogg said was accurate but obviously the disingenuous are suggesting that this is him criticising victims when it isn't. It's recognising that when the sh1t hits the fan that it's you....the sh1t and the fan and you need to make the decisions....It's not fair, it's horrible but it's reality. Often people don't want to hear it. Never forget that for many different reasons 'experts' are often wrong.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.