Can we all take a minute please to......

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Can we all take a minute please to......

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 5 of 5 << First < 1 2 3 4 5

Mapletree Croydon 11 Sep 19 5.36pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger I bet you have that problem a lot because most of your life is made up. Thanks for the input Sonia
Alert a moderator to this post

Mapletree

Croydon 11 Sep 19 5.36pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

I bet you have that problem a lot because most of your life is made up.

Thanks for the input Sonia

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 11 Sep 19 5.41pm
Originally posted by Mapletree Thanks for the input Sonia Your Walter Mitty tales are getting boring.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

11 Sep 19 5.41pm

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Originally posted by Mapletree

Thanks for the input Sonia

Your Walter Mitty tales are getting boring.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 Sep 19 8.25pm
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle Do you have the same opinion of anyone in the business world taking unilateral decisions which affect their employers finances? Not a reasonable analogy. Bercow expressed a strong opinion, which he believed was also the view of the House of Commons, which caused Mrs May not to request him to invite Trump to address Parliament. If she had decided to ignore his advice and make the request I guess he would have done so. So he wasn't taking a decision. He was giving advice. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 11 Sep 19 8.25pm

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Do you have the same opinion of anyone in the business world taking unilateral decisions which affect their employers finances?

Not a reasonable analogy.

Bercow expressed a strong opinion, which he believed was also the view of the House of Commons, which caused Mrs May not to request him to invite Trump to address Parliament. If she had decided to ignore his advice and make the request I guess he would have done so. So he wasn't taking a decision. He was giving advice.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 Sep 19 8.39pm
Originally posted by the silurian err dont most people accused of something deny it? Murderers, rapists, bank robbers etc It just seems that you will always take the opposite view to most others on here, you would say black was white just to be contrary, so on that basis Im done with trying to argue with your myopic views That someone denies something has to be tested and the truth determined. Even the guilty deserve a fair trial. That's ALL I am arguing. Until his actions have been either confirmed or not we ought to reserve judgement. Have you never been falsely accused? I know I have. I have a situation right now in which someone with whom I had a very minor car accident (our wing mirrors touched), genuinely caused entirely by him, is trying to claim compensation for a non existent injury and is accusing me of driving into him when we stopped to exchange details. It's completely false but there were no witnesses and as a consequence my insurance might be impacted. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 11 Sep 19 8.39pm

Originally posted by the silurian

err dont most people accused of something deny it? Murderers, rapists, bank robbers etc
It just seems that you will always take the opposite view to most others on here, you would say black was white just to be contrary, so on that basis Im done with trying to argue with your myopic views

That someone denies something has to be tested and the truth determined. Even the guilty deserve a fair trial.

That's ALL I am arguing. Until his actions have been either confirmed or not we ought to reserve judgement. Have you never been falsely accused? I know I have. I have a situation right now in which someone with whom I had a very minor car accident (our wing mirrors touched), genuinely caused entirely by him, is trying to claim compensation for a non existent injury and is accusing me of driving into him when we stopped to exchange details. It's completely false but there were no witnesses and as a consequence my insurance might be impacted.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

elgrande bedford 11 Sep 19 8.40pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Unless and until what he has been accused of has been fully investigated we should give him, as everyone, the benefit of the doubt. Mud slinging exists in Parliament just as much as elsewhere. He has not been "peddling his own agenda". He has been doing his job of ensuring that Parliament is sovereign. His own current agenda is unknown, but in the past he was staunchly on the right wing of the Tory party. He was but for the last few years he has become very left win. He is a horrible little man who the term "short man syndrome " was invented. always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.
Alert a moderator to this post

elgrande

bedford 11 Sep 19 8.40pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Unless and until what he has been accused of has been fully investigated we should give him, as everyone, the benefit of the doubt. Mud slinging exists in Parliament just as much as elsewhere.

He has not been "peddling his own agenda". He has been doing his job of ensuring that Parliament is sovereign. His own current agenda is unknown, but in the past he was staunchly on the right wing of the Tory party.

He was but for the last few years he has become very left win.
He is a horrible little man who the term "short man syndrome " was invented.

always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert a moderator to this post

elgrande bedford 11 Sep 19 8.43pm
You know,I would have bet my house on certain posters sticking up for him. So f***ing predictable. always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.
Alert a moderator to this post

elgrande

bedford 11 Sep 19 8.43pm

You know,I would have bet my house on certain posters sticking up for him.

So f***ing predictable.

always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle 11 Sep 19 8.43pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Not a reasonable analogy. Bercow expressed a strong opinion, which he believed was also the view of the House of Commons, which caused Mrs May not to request him to invite Trump to address Parliament. If she had decided to ignore his advice and make the request I guess he would have done so. So he wasn't taking a decision. He was giving advice. So when Bercow said, “I was speaking my own view. I had a sense that I was speaking for a majority of the House” and “it is not a government prerogative; that is a matter for the speakers of the two houses” he was talking about giving his advice? Even though he apologised to Norman Fowler for not including him in the decision making.
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

11 Sep 19 8.43pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Not a reasonable analogy.

So when Bercow said, “I was speaking my own view. I had a sense that I was speaking for a majority of the House” and “it is not a government prerogative; that is a matter for the speakers of the two houses” he was talking about giving his advice? Even though he apologised to Norman Fowler for not including him in the decision making.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 Sep 19 8.45pm
Originally posted by Spiderman Over the years I have read some b**cks on here but this takes the biscuit. The role of the speaker should be an unbiased position, as have all those previously shown. He will go down in history as the most hated speaker, given a standing ovation by the SNP and Lib Dims tells everything really. By the way look how many Tories were left in the chamber, as they presumably couldn't bear listening to the Scottish p*. What do you think of the childish behaviour by Labour MPs, behaviour that seemed to be condoned by the Speaker. Wonder what he would have done if it had been Brexiteers His bias is entirely towards the rights of Parliament as a whole and against the executive over stretching itself. He has been very even handed with all. Only the hard line Brexiteers "hate" him. So your post says much more about your own bias than it does about Bercow's. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 11 Sep 19 8.45pm

Originally posted by Spiderman

Over the years I have read some b****cks on here but this takes the biscuit.
The role of the speaker should be an unbiased position, as have all those previously shown. He will go down in history as the most hated speaker, given a standing ovation by the SNP and Lib Dims tells everything really. By the way look how many Tories were left in the chamber, as they presumably couldn't bear listening to the Scottish p***.
What do you think of the childish behaviour by Labour MPs, behaviour that seemed to be condoned by the Speaker. Wonder what he would have done if it had been Brexiteers

His bias is entirely towards the rights of Parliament as a whole and against the executive over stretching itself. He has been very even handed with all.

Only the hard line Brexiteers "hate" him. So your post says much more about your own bias than it does about Bercow's.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 11 Sep 19 8.51pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle That someone denies something has to be tested and the truth determined. Even the guilty deserve a fair trial. That's ALL I am arguing. Until his actions have been either confirmed or not we ought to reserve judgement. Have you never been falsely accused? I know I have. I have a situation right now in which someone with whom I had a very minor car accident (our wing mirrors touched), genuinely caused entirely by him, is trying to claim compensation for a non existent injury and is accusing me of driving into him when we stopped to exchange details. It's completely false but there were no witnesses and as a consequence my insurance might be impacted. At your age in your type of car they only do 6mph. I have visions of family guys herbert and the german fighting in slow mo. Is the accuser old and stubborn.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 11 Sep 19 8.51pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That someone denies something has to be tested and the truth determined. Even the guilty deserve a fair trial.

At your age in your type of car they only do 6mph.
I have visions of family guys herbert and the german fighting in slow mo.
Is the accuser old and stubborn.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 Sep 19 9.07pm
Originally posted by cryrst At your age in your type of car they only do 6mph. I have visions of family guys herbert and the german fighting in slow mo. Is the accuser old and stubborn. I drive a 3 year old Golf. It will be a few years yet before I get a motorised pram! The other driver is, from his accent and name, originally from Eastern Europe, in his 30s about 6.6 tall. 110 Kgs min, athletic and menacing. He threatened me and I was pretty intimidated as I am, believe it or not, very calm and reasonable in these circumstances. It's a blatant attempt to defraud the insurer. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 11 Sep 19 9.07pm

Originally posted by cryrst

At your age in your type of car they only do 6mph.
I have visions of family guys herbert and the german fighting in slow mo.
Is the accuser old and stubborn.

I drive a 3 year old Golf. It will be a few years yet before I get a motorised pram!

The other driver is, from his accent and name, originally from Eastern Europe, in his 30s about 6.6 tall. 110 Kgs min, athletic and menacing. He threatened me and I was pretty intimidated as I am, believe it or not, very calm and reasonable in these circumstances. It's a blatant attempt to defraud the insurer.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle 11 Sep 19 9.12pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle I drive a 3 year old Golf. It will be a few years yet before I get a motorised pram! The other driver is, from his accent and name, originally from Eastern Europe, in his 30s about 6.6 tall. 110 Kgs min, athletic and menacing. He threatened me and I was pretty intimidated as I am, believe it or not, very calm and reasonable in these circumstances. It's a blatant attempt to defraud the insurer. Good luck with this. Hope you weren’t too shaken up by the incident.
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

11 Sep 19 9.12pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I drive a 3 year old Golf. It will be a few years yet before I get a motorised pram!

Good luck with this. Hope you weren’t too shaken up by the incident.

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 11 Sep 19 9.16pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle I drive a 3 year old Golf. It will be a few years yet before I get a motorised pram! The other driver is, from his accent and name, originally from Eastern Europe, in his 30s about 6.6 tall. 110 Kgs min, athletic and menacing. He threatened me and I was pretty intimidated as I am, believe it or not, very calm and reasonable in these circumstances. It's a blatant attempt to defraud the insurer. Bloody immigrants!
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 11 Sep 19 9.16pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I drive a 3 year old Golf. It will be a few years yet before I get a motorised pram!

Bloody immigrants!

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 5 of 5 << First < 1 2 3 4 5

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Can we all take a minute please to......

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors