This is all theoretical but I don't get the difference between someone wanting to change their gender which appears to be OK and someone who wants to change their sexual orientation which has certain people howling with rage.

Now of course their is no such thing as a treatment for sexual preference change but one day their might be.

Back in the real world the LBGTQzzzzzz community would have a fit and would try and block any research into this. But it does occur to me that there could be legitimate uses for it so Widdecombe has a point it should not be dismissed out of hand.

If you could some how change a person's sexual preference could this not lead to a "cure" for paedophiles and rapists? Now I know that people will say hang em or lock em up for life but it could be a practical solution.

And if a gay person really wanted to prefer people of the opposite sex well why not? Shouldn't we "celebrate" that as well?

Sorry i went a bit off topic here.

Edited by Badger11 (04 Jun 2019 11.04pm)

One more point

In your dreams he is.

Sargon has over two and a half thousand patrons who donate to him every month.

The non PC brigade now have alternative payment systems that don't response to the bullying tactics of 'offended' activists.

As for the censorship tactics of companies in silicon valley. The partizan decisions to bow to far left activists and the 'offended' crowd will see them eventually deemed to be publishers which will effectively destroy them.

Only companies that don't take sides on political content and don't act unless the law has been broken will get to operate.

Because Trump won and the supreme court balance went to conservatives when these cases come up the left's view is toast.

Enjoy your brief time abusing free speech rights: It won't last.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Boy are you paranoid. Big corporations are anything but left wing. If you think they are, take a look at their tax returns. And free speech is not being abused. Freedom of speech is purely a government thing which means that the government can't arrest you. It does not protect you from the consequences of your idiotic "opinions" on a privately owned platform such as YouTube, Patreon etc. which is why people like Sargon are getting kicked off them. Drop the victim act and take off the tin foil hat.

Maybe try taking up a course on political theory too.

Edited by inflikted (06 Jun 2019 3.33am)

Milkshakes Against Fascism

Sargon uses subscribestar for patrons.

'What do the non pc brigade stand for?' You just answered your own question.

Race relations?, it depends upon the individual you are talking about I suppose. These are individuals, not a collective. What do you mean by 'race relations'?

In terms of Sargon I know he doesn't believe in 'group rights'.....so he's against identity politics....others like 'On the offensive' aren't.

Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Jun 2019 5.30am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

?

Well it's 2883 to be exact. His income is probably around that of an MP from that and he has other direct to him income.

He isn't sucking corporate gonads like you.

Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Jun 2019 1.07pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)