7 Labour MPs Quit

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

7 Labour MPs Quit

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 5 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

Penge Eagle Beckenham 19 Feb 19 2.57pm
Originally posted by johnno42000 The majority of those eligible to vote didn't vote to leave as around 27% didn't vote, add that to those who voted remain means that a majority of the total electorate did not vote to leave. (I'm not saying how the 27% would have voted just that they didn't vote leave). So you are counting children among those who didn't vote to leave. Oh my days.
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

Penge Eagle

Beckenham 19 Feb 19 2.57pm

Originally posted by johnno42000

The majority of those eligible to vote didn't vote to leave as around 27% didn't vote, add that to those who voted remain means that a majority of the total electorate did not vote to leave. (I'm not saying how the 27% would have voted just that they didn't vote leave).

So you are counting children among those who didn't vote to leave. Oh my days.

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

johnno42000 19 Feb 19 3.04pm
Originally posted by Penge Eagle So you are counting children among those who didn't vote to leave. Oh my days. Please read I said those eligible to vote. Oh your days. Edited by johnno42000 (19 Feb 2019 3.05pm) 'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'
Alert a moderator to this post

johnno42000

19 Feb 19 3.04pm

Originally posted by Penge Eagle

So you are counting children among those who didn't vote to leave. Oh my days.

Please read I said those eligible to vote. Oh your days.

Edited by johnno42000 (19 Feb 2019 3.05pm)

'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'

Alert a moderator to this post

johnno42000 19 Feb 19 3.06pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays So what? The reverse is also true. Most of the laws of this land..... most of what constitutes how your life runs....you didn't vote for or get a say on. At least there was an opportunity with this. Please read. I also said the reverse was true. 'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'
Alert a moderator to this post

johnno42000

19 Feb 19 3.06pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

So what? The reverse is also true.

Most of the laws of this land..... most of what constitutes how your life runs....you didn't vote for or get a say on.

At least there was an opportunity with this.

Please read. I also said the reverse was true.

'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 19 Feb 19 3.14pm
Originally posted by johnno42000 Please read. I also said the reverse was true. Yeah, you included that in an edit to your post that you made while I was typing the response. The upshot is it makes no difference. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

19 Feb 19 3.14pm

Originally posted by johnno42000

Please read. I also said the reverse was true.

Yeah, you included that in an edit to your post that you made while I was typing the response.

The upshot is it makes no difference.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 19 Feb 19 3.20pm
Originally posted by steeleye20 Johhno is correct though when you consider that whole-hearted consent was required in the first referendum to remain in the common market, and to be consistent this test should have applied in the 2016 vote. As it was not done, it has led to a nation divided. Perhaps Wilson realised that, an extremely capable politician. Led to a nation divided? How would a different decision have been any different? Wilson was a disaster. I'll also add that the common market is a very different animal to what we have now......It was not a fledgling political superstate. I support the idea of a common market and so do most on the right. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

19 Feb 19 3.20pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

Johhno is correct though when you consider that whole-hearted consent was required in the first referendum to remain in the common market, and to be consistent this test should have applied in the 2016 vote.

As it was not done, it has led to a nation divided.

Perhaps Wilson realised that, an extremely capable politician.

Led to a nation divided? How would a different decision have been any different?

Wilson was a disaster.

I'll also add that the common market is a very different animal to what we have now......It was not a fledgling political superstate.

I support the idea of a common market and so do most on the right.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

topcat Holmesdale / Surbiton 19 Feb 19 3.23pm
I'm all for more independent MPs, the more the merrier. However, people didn't vote for an independent candidate, therefore there should be a by-election. They should change the rules so this becomes the law. It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Alert a moderator to this post

topcat

Holmesdale / Surbiton 19 Feb 19 3.23pm

I'm all for more independent MPs, the more the merrier. However, people didn't vote for an independent candidate, therefore there should be a by-election.

They should change the rules so this becomes the law.

It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.

Alert a moderator to this post

ChrisGC Wantage 19 Feb 19 4.50pm
Originally posted by topcat I'm all for more independent MPs, the more the merrier. However, people didn't vote for an independent candidate, therefore there should be a by-election. They should change the rules so this becomes the law. Agree. The irony of these f***ers demanding a second referendum but ruling out a by election. One even said: "the last thing anyone wants is another election".
Alert a moderator to this post

ChrisGC

Wantage 19 Feb 19 4.50pm

Originally posted by topcat

I'm all for more independent MPs, the more the merrier. However, people didn't vote for an independent candidate, therefore there should be a by-election.

They should change the rules so this becomes the law.

Agree. The irony of these f***ers demanding a second referendum but ruling out a by election.

One even said: "the last thing anyone wants is another election".

Alert a moderator to this post

ChrisGC Wantage 19 Feb 19 4.55pm
Originally posted by johnno42000 The majority of those eligible to vote didn't vote to leave as around 27% didn't vote, add that to those who voted remain means that a majority of the total electorate did not vote to leave. (I'm not saying how the 27% would have voted just that they didn't vote leave). Zzzzzzzzzz not this clutch again. It was one of the highest ever turn outs so the extrapolation of the figure can be trusted to be an accurate representation across the whole voter demographic. Even to these completely irrelevant percentages, it works out as a split of 38% leave, 33% remain (or something like that, it's a mute point so the figure doesn't stick in my mind)
Alert a moderator to this post

ChrisGC

Wantage 19 Feb 19 4.55pm

Originally posted by johnno42000

Zzzzzzzzzz not this clutch again.

It was one of the highest ever turn outs so the extrapolation of the figure can be trusted to be an accurate representation across the whole voter demographic.

Even to these completely irrelevant percentages, it works out as a split of 38% leave, 33% remain (or something like that, it's a mute point so the figure doesn't stick in my mind)

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 19 Feb 19 5.18pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays So what? The reverse is also true. Most of the laws of this land..... most of what constitutes how your life runs....you didn't vote for or get a say on. At least there was an opportunity with this. We do vote for laws by voting someone within a political party into power to make and impliment them for us. There is an opportunity to vote your one in.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 19 Feb 19 5.18pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

So what? The reverse is also true.

Most of the laws of this land..... most of what constitutes how your life runs....you didn't vote for or get a say on.

At least there was an opportunity with this.

We do vote for laws by voting someone within a political party into power to make and impliment them for us.
There is an opportunity to vote your one in.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 19 Feb 19 5.51pm
Originally posted by cryrst We do vote for laws by voting someone within a political party into power to make and impliment them for us. There is an opportunity to vote your one in. That's nothing like the same thing. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

19 Feb 19 5.51pm

Originally posted by cryrst

We do vote for laws by voting someone within a political party into power to make and impliment them for us.
There is an opportunity to vote your one in.

That's nothing like the same thing.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

johnno42000 19 Feb 19 6.17pm
Originally posted by ChrisGC Zzzzzzzzzz not this clutch again. It was one of the highest ever turn outs so the extrapolation of the figure can be trusted to be an accurate representation across the whole voter demographic. Even to these completely irrelevant percentages, it works out as a split of 38% leave, 33% remain (or something like that, it's a mute point so the figure doesn't stick in my mind) Neither leave or remain had a majority of the eligible vote. It isn't rocket science. I voted remain but I accept that the way the vote went that we should now leave. 'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'
Alert a moderator to this post

johnno42000

19 Feb 19 6.17pm

Originally posted by ChrisGC

Zzzzzzzzzz not this clutch again.

It was one of the highest ever turn outs so the extrapolation of the figure can be trusted to be an accurate representation across the whole voter demographic.

Even to these completely irrelevant percentages, it works out as a split of 38% leave, 33% remain (or something like that, it's a mute point so the figure doesn't stick in my mind)

Neither leave or remain had a majority of the eligible vote. It isn't rocket science.

I voted remain but I accept that the way the vote went that we should now leave.

'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 19 Feb 19 6.23pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays That's nothing like the same thing. But we as the public cant expect a referendum on every law change.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 19 Feb 19 6.23pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

That's nothing like the same thing.

But we as the public cant expect a referendum on every law change.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 5 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

7 Labour MPs Quit

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors