You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Spurs to make £40M bid for Zaha
November 24 2024 9.21am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Spurs to make £40M bid for Zaha

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 5 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

  

FairweatherEagle Flag London 21 Mar 18 12.33pm Send a Private Message to FairweatherEagle Add FairweatherEagle as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Are you suggesting that we bought him at gunpoint and not of our own free will?

It's about as daft as saying that we owe Everton big time for stitching them up with a winger that was out for a season with an ACL injury


I get the impression that it was clear as day that Zeki was a wrong 'un to all and sundry before we bought him but went ahead anyway, I guess RH8 is saying Levi mislead us in an unethical way? Whereas when we sold Bolasie, we wanted to keep him desperately. We had no idea he was on the verge of an ACL tear whereas levy knew full well fryers was gash but mislead us otherwise.


Edited by FairweatherEagle (21 Mar 2018 12.34pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Midlands Eagle Flag 21 Mar 18 12.38pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by FairweatherEagle

I get the impression that it was clear as day that Zeki was a wrong 'un to all and sundry before we bought him but went ahead anyway, I guess RH8 is saying Levi mislead us in an unethical way? Whereas when we sold Bolasie, we wanted to keep him desperately. We had no idea he was on the verge of an ACL tear whereas levy knew full well fryers was gash but mislead us otherwise.

That's not my recollection of what happened as I seem to remember that none of us really knew anything about him apart from what was in the public domain and if you're trying to suggest that we bought him on the recommendation of the selling Chairman then you are suggesting that our chairman and manager are incredibly stupid

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Sportyteacher Flag London 21 Mar 18 1.11pm Send a Private Message to Sportyteacher Add Sportyteacher as a friend

Hands off Zaha who is kingmaker of play for Palace and needs to stay.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
phillanth Flag London 21 Mar 18 1.45pm

Originally posted by tonymikejoe

[bigger]We've sold Murray and suffered terribly at centre-forward, yet at the time idiots were on here salivating at the £4m from Bournemouth.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing. 1. Glenn wanted to leave as he did not expect to be first choice once we signed Wickham. 2. £4 million seemed a great deal for a player of his age at the time. 3. He certainly did not pull up any trees at Bournemouth. 4. Who was to know that Wickham would be almost permanently injured?

Obviously like everybody else on here, I wish we had kept him now but please do not rewrite history.[/bigger]


Edited by phillanth (21 Mar 2018 1.45pm)

Edited by phillanth (21 Mar 2018 1.46pm)

Edited by phillanth (21 Mar 2018 1.47pm)

Edited by phillanth (21 Mar 2018 1.47pm)

Edited by phillanth (21 Mar 2018 1.48pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Palace in the Blood Flag 21 Mar 18 4.56pm Send a Private Message to Palace in the Blood Add Palace in the Blood as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

That's not my recollection of what happened as I seem to remember that none of us really knew anything about him apart from what was in the public domain and if you're trying to suggest that we bought him on the recommendation of the selling Chairman then you are suggesting that our chairman and manager are incredibly stupid

Fryers was considered a star in the making at Man U. Fergie was unhappy when he left to go to Begium and then Spurs. For some reason he lost his way but so did Wilf on opposite journey. The difference is Wilf returned and the rest is history. Maybe both were too young for that move? maybe both were homesick? Who knows. In retrospect Fryers was a bad buy but at the time he looked a rough diamond we could polish

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Goldfiinger Flag Just down the road 21 Mar 18 6.22pm Send a Private Message to Goldfiinger Add Goldfiinger as a friend

Moral of the story...

Bad buy = Chairman is clueless
Good buy = Manager is genius

Zero middle ground and don't anyone forget it!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Sansbup Flag Norfolk 21 Mar 18 6.50pm Send a Private Message to Sansbup Add Sansbup as a friend

Ok, so Spurs value Kane at "around £173m" but Wilf at £40m. Right.

Both the Daily Mail and Spurs can FRO.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
FairweatherEagle Flag London 21 Mar 18 8.02pm Send a Private Message to FairweatherEagle Add FairweatherEagle as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

That's not my recollection of what happened as I seem to remember that none of us really knew anything about him apart from what was in the public domain and if you're trying to suggest that we bought him on the recommendation of the selling Chairman then you are suggesting that our chairman and manager are incredibly stupid

That's not what the word "mislead" necessarily implies. You're choosing to take it as a slight on the chairman and/or manager.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
tonymikejoe Flag UK 21 Mar 18 10.25pm Send a Private Message to tonymikejoe Add tonymikejoe as a friend

Originally posted by phillanth

Originally posted by tonymikejoe

[bigger]We've sold Murray and suffered terribly at centre-forward, yet at the time idiots were on here salivating at the £4m from Bournemouth.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing. 1. Glenn wanted to leave as he did not expect to be first choice once we signed Wickham. 2. £4 million seemed a great deal for a player of his age at the time. 3. He certainly did not pull up any trees at Bournemouth. 4. Who was to know that Wickham would be almost permanently injured?

Obviously like everybody else on here, I wish we had kept him now but please do not rewrite history.[/bigger]


Edited by phillanth (21 Mar 2018 1.45pm)

Edited by phillanth (21 Mar 2018 1.46pm)

Edited by phillanth (21 Mar 2018 1.47pm)

Edited by phillanth (21 Mar 2018 1.47pm)

Edited by phillanth (21 Mar 2018 1.48pm)

Hey Phillanth, I don't think you realise how annnoying such replies are.

Criticising the Murray sale is Not In Hindsight.

Myself and others (a minority) were screaming it at the time.

Yes, he was not first choice, agreed. That's is what is so aggravating, that Pardew was such a terrible judge of a player.

I don't give a monkeys about his Bournemouth record. He was good for us. That's all I care about.

I am not rewriting history, so stop saying it.

This was all said at the time and there is no need to get the hump just because you were on the wrong side of it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pssguy Flag 22 Mar 18 6.09am Send a Private Message to pssguy Add pssguy as a friend

Originally posted by tonymikejoe

No way will we replace Wilf with anyone as good, more likely a load of old dross.

Remember the garbage Spurs bought when they sold Bale?........ditto Palace.

Well Eriksen was quite the buy, they made money on Chadli and Paulinho is a regular for Barcelona and Brazil so obviously has some talent
They are also finishing in top 4 now

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
tonymikejoe Flag UK 22 Mar 18 8.38am Send a Private Message to tonymikejoe Add tonymikejoe as a friend

Great stuff.

Yep, I'm sure Spurs fans are thrilled by Paulinho's exploits for another club and enjoying updates on Chadli from the WBA treatment room.

I notice you did not include £26m Roberto Soldado; £8.6m Etienne Capoue or £8.5m Vlad Chiriches.

How did those buys work out?

The current Spurs team was not built on Bale money, this is the next generation of signings.

The first was a complete flop, save Eriksen, but I don't think it was worth effectively swapping Bale for him do you?

Or are you now going to bang on about £30m Erik Lamela?


Originally posted by pssguy

Well Eriksen was quite the buy, they made money on Chadli and Paulinho is a regular for Barcelona and Brazil so obviously has some talent
They are also finishing in top 4 now

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
taylors lovechild Flag 22 Mar 18 9.52am Send a Private Message to taylors lovechild Add taylors lovechild as a friend

Originally posted by tonymikejoe

Hey Phillanth, I don't think you realise how annnoying such replies are.

Criticising the Murray sale is Not In Hindsight.

Myself and others (a minority) were screaming it at the time.

Yes, he was not first choice, agreed. That's is what is so aggravating, that Pardew was such a terrible judge of a player.

I don't give a monkeys about his Bournemouth record. He was good for us. That's all I care about.

I am not rewriting history, so stop saying it.

This was all said at the time and there is no need to get the hump just because you were on the wrong side of it.

I'm pleased for Murray, but he is 34, has scored only 7 goals from open play in 36 appearances in the PL this season, is slow and has no assists. He's not been tearing up trees, just performing better than expected. It would have been good to have him around, but Bentenke would have started ahead of him last season, and rightly so. This season the Belgian has been poor, but an ageing Murray was never going to be happy playing second fiddle. And he wasn't, and he left, the end. When he left I thought he was looking slow and off the pace and I have never changed my view on that.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 5 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Spurs to make £40M bid for Zaha