This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 13 Nov 17 4.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
So what your saying is that the 'liberal left voter' is responsible for decisions made by right wing and right of centre governments? Who exactly were the Liberal Left voting for between 1980 and 1997, and after 2010. I'd be surprised to hear they were voting Conservative I'm clearly not saying that. But they are making it easy for governments to pursue this policy by using the media to actively promote it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 13 Nov 17 5.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I'm clearly not saying that. But they are making it easy for governments to pursue this policy by using the media to actively promote it. The published media which is in the main, the newspapers, are very right-wing indeed. The Mail, The Express, The Telegraph, The Sun and others. You don't quite get it. Everything you don't like today has evolved because your side pursued it and you voted for them and it over and over without examining the consequences. Of course you would vote Tory without question. It's in your nature but all the main Euro treaties were signed by Conservative governments; globalisation and aggressive capitalism in the UK happened under their watch too. The fallout is hugely because of your team's actions. You've been had but your voting preference say's it is with your blessing. Edited by Kermit8 (13 Nov 2017 5.08pm)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 13 Nov 17 5.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
The published media which is in the main, the newspapers, are very right-wing indeed. The Mail, The Express, The Telegraph, The Sun and others. You don't quite get it. Everything you don't like today has evolved because your side pursued it and you voted for them and it over and over without examining the consequences. Of course you would vote Tory without question. It's in your nature but all the main Euro treaties were signed by Conservative governments; globalisation and aggressive capitalism in the UK happened under their watch too. The fallout is hugely because of your team's actions. You've been had but your voting preference say's it is with your blessing. Edited by Kermit8 (13 Nov 2017 5.08pm) We are all had with our voting preferences and to say that Labour governments are not equally if not more guilty is just cobblers. The media is hugely left wing. Naming a few newspapers that are not doesn't alter that. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (13 Nov 2017 5.21pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 13 Nov 17 5.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
The published media which is in the main, the newspapers, are very right-wing indeed. The Mail, The Express, The Telegraph, The Sun and others. You don't quite get it. Everything you don't like today has evolved because your side pursued it and you voted for them and it over and over without examining the consequences. Of course you would vote Tory without question. It's in your nature but all the main Euro treaties were signed by Conservative governments; globalisation and aggressive capitalism in the UK happened under their watch too. The fallout is hugely because of your team's actions. You've been had but your voting preference say's it is with your blessing. Edited by Kermit8 (13 Nov 2017 5.08pm) Guardian, Independent, Observer, The i ... And presumably you consider the 13 years of Labour government Tory then? And you voted for them over and over without examining the consequences. Of course you would vote Labour without question. It's in your nature.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 13 Nov 17 5.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I'm clearly not saying that. But they are making it easy for governments to pursue this policy by using the media to actively promote it. How exactly does that work then. If they're not the government, and they're not the majority of the people voting for the winning political party; how exactly can they be responsible for setting policy decisions. Could it be that 'the liberal left' are the majority that political parties appeal to in key swing constituencies. I'm not sure how they're making it easy for government to pursue such policy, if the government themselves aren't pushing those policies? How is this liberal left conspiracy subverting democratic process?
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 13 Nov 17 5.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Guardian, Independent, Observer, The i ... And presumably you consider the 13 years of Labour government Tory then? And you voted for them over and over without examining the consequences. Of course you would vote Labour without question. It's in your nature. Where as the Telegraphy, the Times, the Sun and The Mail have no overt influence or represent different agendas. Whilst I'm not a fan of political bias, it would be weird to assume that there isn't a) a right wing press and b) that it doesn't have a wide circulation (in fact wider than the papers you mention). Of course, Murdoch and The Sun were big supporters of Blair and New Labour (right of centre politically, and widely regarded with suspicion and distrust by the traditional left over the history of their 'reign').
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 13 Nov 17 5.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
We are all had with our voting preferences and to say that Labour governments are not equally if not more guilty is just cobblers. The media is hugely left wing. Naming a few newspapers that are not doesn't alter that. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (13 Nov 2017 5.21pm) You and your political ilk, the actual perpetraitors [sic] are a helluvalot more 'guilty' for where we find ourselves today socially and economically than those of the left who may or may not have done exactly the same things 1979-1997 had they been in power like the Right were.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 13 Nov 17 5.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
The entire body politic has moved towards the liberal-left, that's why you hear the likes of UKIP called crypto-fascists, yet they just represent traditional Tory views. We have suffered from the consequences of the liberal-left drift exhibited by all parties. Mrs May should try putting forward Tory policies rather than pander to the delusional ideas of the liberal-left. So basically, democracy - c'est la vie. I think there in lies the problem, most voters these days are kind of liberal (rather than left or right wing) and respond to identity politics over economic strategy. Problem of the world, the old guard are talking ideological industrial era politics, in a time when consumer politics really holds sway.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 13 Nov 17 5.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
How exactly does that work then. If they're not the government, and they're not the majority of the people voting for the winning political party; how exactly can they be responsible for setting policy decisions. Could it be that 'the liberal left' are the majority that political parties appeal to in key swing constituencies. I'm not sure how they're making it easy for government to pursue such policy, if the government themselves aren't pushing those policies? How is this liberal left conspiracy subverting democratic process? I never said they were. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (13 Nov 2017 5.42pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 13 Nov 17 5.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I never said it was. Thing is, I think most people's experience of daily life is that multiculturalism is kind of working. They mix with people of different ethnicities, cultures and religion on a daily basis, and have friends, schoolmates and work colleagues across those spectrums. Mixed cultural marriages and relationships seem more common place. Most people don't really seem to care about peoples race, culture, sexuality, gender, ethnicity etc in the way they used to. Problem is I think the reality is that those 'traditional views' aren't very popular anymore - and parties that hold them don't seem to do too well. UKIP once the referendum was done and dusted, immediately seemed to lose most of its support - because the issue wasn't 'multiculturalism' but EU migration (and they were right about that - the Freedom of Movement was a problem and an issue - not because of migration but because of the scale and impact on society). 'Traditional views' I think just aren't popular enough.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 13 Nov 17 5.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Where as the Telegraphy, the Times, the Sun and The Mail have no overt influence or represent different agendas. Whilst I'm not a fan of political bias, it would be weird to assume that there isn't a) a right wing press and b) that it doesn't have a wide circulation (in fact wider than the papers you mention). Of course, Murdoch and The Sun were big supporters of Blair and New Labour (right of centre politically, and widely regarded with suspicion and distrust by the traditional left over the history of their 'reign'). Of course there is a mixture of political bias in newspapers. Is there a market for more left wing newspapers? I doubt it, but if there was, someone would be busy publishing one to meet market demand.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 13 Nov 17 5.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
So basically, democracy - c'est la vie. I think there in lies the problem, most voters these days are kind of liberal (rather than left or right wing) and respond to identity politics over economic strategy. Problem of the world, the old guard are talking ideological industrial era politics, in a time when consumer politics really holds sway. I don't think they are. To use that old expression, 'the silent majority' are largely conservative with a small 'c'.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.