This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
HeathMan Purley 10 Aug 17 1.05pm | |
---|---|
What is British though? I am thinking about experiencing a common understanding when speaking with another - who lives in the UK - at perhaps a motorway service area over fifty miles from home as one example.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rubin 10 Aug 17 4.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
What is British though? What it's certainly not is FGM, death for apostasy, honour killings, death for/criminalising homosexuality, segregation of genders etc.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 10 Aug 17 4.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Oh no...not this again. I think its a valid question, when we talking about people only being British if they fit within non-legally defined criteria. To me, anyone who is a British Citizen is British.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 10 Aug 17 4.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Sigh! It's the major homogeneous centre within the margins of society. Yeah but how do you actually define that centre and surely you can contribute to British Culture and society from the fringes of society - isn't that where most of our cultural history originates - such as art, music etc. I'm not being awkward here or pretentious, I thinking how can someone actually be defined as being British or not British in an manner that can be quantified.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 10 Aug 17 4.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I think its a valid question, when we talking about people only being British if they fit within non-legally defined criteria. To me, anyone who is a British Citizen is British. Well for a deep thinking and intelligent person like you that is a very reductive view. Why do those on the left start hiding behind definitions when we all know what we are talking about. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (10 Aug 2017 4.46pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 10 Aug 17 4.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Yeah but how do you actually define that centre and surely you can contribute to British Culture and society from the fringes of society - isn't that where most of our cultural history originates - such as art, music etc. I'm not being awkward here or pretentious, I thinking how can someone actually be defined as being British or not British in an manner that can be quantified. The problem here is the definition. 'British' is now meaningless in any real sense. With mass multi culture we are now divided into groups of immigrant communities with those of us who came here hundreds or thousands of years ago still being the majority. The edges may overlap but there are still clearly defined cultures.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ray in Houston Houston 10 Aug 17 4.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
As I suggested. Nationality is becoming less significant in the modern world and certainly in Britain because many migrants are more loyal to their religion and or country of origin than where they have chosen to live. Why does an immigrant have the embrace the "culture of the majority"? If they all did that, you'd have nothing to eat except fish 'n' chip and nothing to listen to except Chas 'n' Dave.
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 10 Aug 17 4.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
Why does an immigrant have the embrace the "culture of the majority"? If they all did that, you'd have nothing to eat except fish 'n' chip and nothing to listen to except Chas 'n' Dave. They don't. But if they want to be recognised as 'one of us' then they need to take steps to fit in.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Direwolf Lincoln 10 Aug 17 5.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
They don't. But if they want to be recognised as 'one of us' then they need to take steps to fit in. But isn't the problem with such an argument that there isn't 'a one of us'? We are riven with cultural, moral, political, ideological, class and economic divisions.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
richard shaw (og)65 my minds eye 10 Aug 17 5.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I get your point, but I don't know how else it can be usefully defined. Interestingly David Gower was born in India. It's one of the few semi interesting facts I know. terry butcher was born in singapore and he literally spilt blood for his country
interviewer " iggy , do you think you influenced anybody?" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 10 Aug 17 5.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Well for a deep thinking and intelligent person like you that is a very reductive view. Why do those on the left start hiding behind definitions when we all know what we are talking about. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (10 Aug 2017 4.46pm) Its more because I've been around this a few times and can't come to a fairer definition. So how do we ascertain who the majority are? And why assume that by default any minority is not British, because they hold different views, opinions and attitudes - doesn't that inform the cultural development of what is British. And how do you ascertain what the majority perceives, thinks or feels - What if in some areas, you're aligned with the majority view, and others your not. Most people probably think they're in the majority (I don't, by experience I think I'm a minority on a lot of things). But of course having a minority view or perception, doesn't mean that your wrong either - This history of British Law is full of incidents in which the rational argument, despite being unpopular, wins out, and becomes the British Norm. Wouldn't they be English and working class, which seems a bit unfair to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, as well as the overseas British citizens such as the Falkland Islanders - as they're immediately outside the majority, in their own nation. What I'm saying, is that the term British in terms of values and culture, gets used a lot, but cannot be reasonably quantified - without accepting irrational values.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 10 Aug 17 5.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by richard shaw (og)65
terry butcher was born in singapore and he literally spilt blood for his country Ha but he didn't metaphorically spill blood for his country, he only played football for England national. Plenty of people in the Commonwealth fought for the UK in the second world war and weren't British.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.