This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Worst Penalty Decision Of The Season !!!
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Y Ddraig Goch  In The Crowd 11 Dec 16 10.46am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Commentator probably looked at "Slow-Mo" from different angles whereas the referee never had the advantage of doing so.Happened very quick and I can totally understand why the referee believed it was a penalty. Quelle surprise
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
Willo  South coast - west of Brighton. 11 Dec 16 10.48am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by alaneagle1
And our Penalty claims Willo.? I felt it was a penalty when Snodgrass made contact with Zaha. As for Benteke, probably the referee felt that contact was made with the ball before he went to ground.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| rollercoaster Cornwall 11 Dec 16 10.49am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Commentator probably looked at "Slow-Mo" from different angles whereas the referee never had the advantage of doing so.Happened very quick and I can totally understand why the referee believed it was a penalty. I would give your views some consideration if you would just occasionally admit that the referee had a bad game that affected the result. Blatantly in this game the referee got some key, result-affecting, decisions wrong.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 11 Dec 16 10.50am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch
Quelle surprise
Even Pardew refused to apportion any blame to the referee and understood why it was given.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 11 Dec 16 10.52am |
|
|---|---|
|
It was right in front of us and after seeing it once you could tell it was a blatant dive and that cheating c*** then picked him self up and scored before gobbing off, what a cnut.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 11 Dec 16 10.55am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by rollercoaster
I would give your views some consideration if you would just occasionally admit that the referee had a bad game that affected the result. Blatantly in this game the referee got some key, result-affecting, decisions wrong. To be totally honest I don't really give a jot if you give any consideration to my views. At the end of the day I make an honest assessment of refereeing decisions and try to understand them from his perspective, recognising all the time that he does not have the luxury of "Slow-Mos" from different angles.It is only natural that at times referees will err from time to time whereas commentators and pundits availing of technology will always be right - surprise,surprise.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Sportyteacher London 11 Dec 16 11.01am |
|
|---|---|
|
Can't understand why refereeing for top flight football doesn't follow the lead of cricket and how teams are each allowed two appeals with the benefit of TV replay? Far too many important decisions are not being followed up that can undoubtedly cost teams important points.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Icepick Tony Chester 11 Dec 16 11.08am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Even Pardew refused to apportion any blame to the referee and understood why it was given. Because if he'd have said the ref got it wrong and was awful he'd be writing a cheque out to the FA. Gives a dive 1st half and waves away a trip on Benteke 2nd half. Inconsistent, poor refereeing which, in this age of technology should never be happening. The quicker football catches up with times the better.
"They got his own song 'He's just too good for you', it's quite unbelievable but when you see it and he's facing up someone - I actually feel sorry for them, 'Cos he actually is" - Ian Holloway |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 11 Dec 16 11.12am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Icepick Tony
Because if he'd have said the ref got it wrong and was awful he'd be writing a cheque out to the FA. Gives a dive 1st half and waves away a trip on Benteke 2nd half. Inconsistent, poor refereeing which, in this age of technology should never be happening. The quicker football catches up with times the better. Not necessarily.Managers can say that a referee made a mistake - it is only when they make allegations about honesty,integrity, fitness etc etc that they get into trouble.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
chateauferret  11 Dec 16 11.14am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Even Pardew refused to apportion any blame to the referee and understood why it was given. Oh look, here's Willo to tell us all that even this most outrageous of decisions was actually reasonable. Three times in one match is not "from time to time". Pardew said what he said because he gets fined if he calls it as it is, as you know perfectly well. "It's hard for the ref" is what coaches have to say when they mean "the ref f***ed that right up". How you're not boiling with rage at Jones' performance yesterday beats me. If I did my job like that I'd be sacked. Edited by chateauferret (11 Dec 2016 11.17am)
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 11 Dec 16 11.19am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chateauferret
Oh look, here's Willo to tell us all that even this most outrageous of decisions was actually reasonable. Pardew said what he said because he gets fined if he calls it as it is, as you know perfectly well. "It's hard for the ref" is what coaches have to say when they mean "the ref f***ed that right up". How you're not boiling with rage at Jones' performance yesterday beats me. If I did my job like that One be sacked. People might deem it "Outrageous" after they have seen it on "Slow-Mo" from a number of occasions.How many of these would have thought it was a blatant penalty if they saw it on the TV in real-time without the aid of any replay ? I happen to believe that without the aid of technology one can totally understand why a penalty was awarded.I believe this is what Pardew was saying. Edited by Willo (11 Dec 2016 11.20am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| rollercoaster Cornwall 11 Dec 16 11.19am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
To be totally honest I don't really give a jot if you give any consideration to my views. At the end of the day I make an honest assessment of refereeing decisions and try to understand them from his perspective, recognising all the time that he does not have the luxury of "Slow-Mos" from different angles.It is only natural that at times referees will err from time to time whereas commentators and pundits availing of technology will always be right - surprise,surprise. If you really don't care if anybody considers what you have to say then I do not understand why you post so often. I have never criticised one of your posts before I was just trying to explain that there must be occasions when you think the referee hasn't done as well as he might and if you were to document these occasionally your support for referees might get a better response. So do you think yesterdays referee had a good game? Equally, pundits have the same advantages over the players too and criticise them as much or perhaps more often than referees. Would you rather there weren't pundits?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.