You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > acab...!
November 26 2024 11.28am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

acab...!

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 5 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

  

soulboy Flag Lewisham 28 Feb 14 1.16pm Send a Private Message to soulboy Add soulboy as a friend

Quote Johnny D at 27 Feb 2014 10.23pm

Quote Breamy11 at 27 Feb 2014 9.56pm

Can someone fill me in on how to say acab please? A.C.A.B OR EY-cab or a-cab


Not sure if you're serious there, but if so, maybe you should ask the families of those two poor girls who got murdered in Manchester when they were tricked into thinking they were responding to a burglar? Just saying, you know. 99.9% of them are regular people just trying to do a good job, with a few who shouldn't be there, just like 99.9% of Palace fans are decent people, with just a few idiots who we could all do without. You always get a few, but it is only ever just a few.

JD, you're beginning to sound like the official police spokesperson on HOL!! Yes, there are some jokers on here who think it clever to use the ACAB acronym, however there are also a number of valid posts that provide informed and personal insight into police treatment of football fans, suggesting the police approach is at times heavy handed, disproportionate and yes, corrupt. These views alone seriously challenge your position which appears to be 'you have nothing to fear from the police at football matches because even if you are arrested it won't go anywhere, because they (police) need evidence'. However, the clear message from some of us is that it is often the police alone who produce the necessary evidence for the Crown Prosecution Service, by providing witness statements corroborating one another! This policy is in the usual course of events fine but at football matches where police (according to testimonies here) are arguably biased and disproportionate in their actions, the ramifications for the 'ordinary fan' can be devastating!!

 


"Deviance is a freedom enjoyed in a city of lightly engaged strangers"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 28 Feb 14 1.50pm Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Quote Mapletree at 27 Feb 2014 12.50pm

Quote Mapletree at 27 Feb 2014 12.47pm

The one thing I will say again is that those FEW idiots who throw stuff, fight up town, run on the pitch, smash up seats, interfere with stewards, light bangers or whatever, even that odd person with the knife etc etc, they don't exactly do the rest of us any favours do they!? Unfortunately unless these things stop, however minor some people may regard them, I don't think things are going to change much.

As for the HF, well I generally feel a bit sorry for them. They do a good job, but again a few idiots (members, non members, tag alongs, people in the same block, whatever you want to call them), keep letting them and the club down with their stupid behaviour.

-------------------------------------
Can't argue with that Johnny, people in glass houses. But I would also say that bung 25k people off the streets together anywhere and you will have a proportion who are d*cks. And in fact it seems to me that football supporters are generally reasonably self-regulating, they don't appear worse to me that any other group. So that brings us back to the question - why are they picked on?

The answer given here, with which I totally agree, is that is because they are an easy target that those in authority have been able to demonize. And if we do nothing about that it is likely to get worse not better until we are all sitting throughout every match, probably with seat belts and crash helmets on. Look at how long it's taking to get safe standing ffs. You can stand at a concert, you can stand in some theatres but you can't stand at football which is where you really want to. Just make sure tickets apply to specific sections and control access, job done. But of course, fans can't be trusted....

Edited by Mapletree (27 Feb 2014 12.47pm)


The same applies to the police surely?

Edited by EverybodyDannsNow (28 Feb 2014 1.50pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
adrian b Flag Landrindod, Wales 28 Feb 14 3.36pm Send a Private Message to adrian b Add adrian b as a friend


A really good and open thread this. Anyone who has been stopped and breatherlysed for driving out of a pub car park for no other reason than where they have come from, can see the point being made here. You would hope that the boys in blue might use their training, experience and common sense in these circunstances, but more often than not their action is based on steriotyping drivers and pub goers. The same very much goes for football fans, as far as ol' bill is concerned.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Johnny D Flag Beckenham 28 Feb 14 7.06pm Send a Private Message to Johnny D Add Johnny D as a friend

Quote soulboy at 28 Feb 2014 1.16pm

Quote Johnny D at 27 Feb 2014 10.23pm

Quote Breamy11 at 27 Feb 2014 9.56pm

Can someone fill me in on how to say acab please? A.C.A.B OR EY-cab or a-cab


Not sure if you're serious there, but if so, maybe you should ask the families of those two poor girls who got murdered in Manchester when they were tricked into thinking they were responding to a burglar? Just saying, you know. 99.9% of them are regular people just trying to do a good job, with a few who shouldn't be there, just like 99.9% of Palace fans are decent people, with just a few idiots who we could all do without. You always get a few, but it is only ever just a few.

JD, you're beginning to sound like the official police spokesperson on HOL!! Yes, there are some jokers on here who think it clever to use the ACAB acronym, however there are also a number of valid posts that provide informed and personal insight into police treatment of football fans, suggesting the police approach is at times heavy handed, disproportionate and yes, corrupt. These views alone seriously challenge your position which appears to be 'you have nothing to fear from the police at football matches because even if you are arrested it won't go anywhere, because they (police) need evidence'. However, the clear message from some of us is that it is often the police alone who produce the necessary evidence for the Crown Prosecution Service, by providing witness statements corroborating one another! This policy is in the usual course of events fine but at football matches where police (according to testimonies here) are arguably biased and disproportionate in their actions, the ramifications for the 'ordinary fan' can be devastating!!

A spokesperson wouldn't give any form of opinion at all! But that's all I'm doing here. That last post was only in response to the one before. Only a joke he may feel, or perhaps he is actually ignorant or just naive enough to actually believe that. But like that other guy said, it's kind of ironic to use it when he's very likely to be one of the ones who feels 'football fans are treated harshly and all labelled as the same troublemakers by the police'.

Knowing a few Old Bill, I think the majority would much rather be doing what they signed up for, directly helping people by catching the bad guys (probably in a fast car!), those ones burgling your houses and mugging your grans - Not standing outside a football ground in the cold and rain on a Saturday afternoon when it's supposed to be their day off! But like I said before, football definitely isn't rugby or cricket where all the fans sit together and generally get along is it, so they have a need to be there.

Anyway, my responses to you, 'mapletree' and 'lyons550' yesterday were more relevant to what we've been going on about, if you haven't seen them. From the last thing you've said today, i can only add that I don't think that being at football would be regarded by an officer as a differentiating factor (in terms of when you've mentioned writing their statements about what happened and how the person behaved etc). By that I mean, if a person acted the very same way outside a nightclub or a shop, they'd be writing almost exactly the same thing about it all.

Now whether that person eventually pleaded/got found guilty and then got treated differently by the courts, just because it happened to be at a football match or was 'football related', perhaps they would. Is that fair? Perhaps not. Perhaps it depends in the factors, such as a pre-organised football fight could be seen as worse than a completely sporadic one in a Town Centre, even if they ended up as the same type of fight (because of the planning involved and prior intent to be violent in public). Just a random example of how they could see things differently to another, I'm not saying I necessarily agree it should matter.

You seem knowledgable, but I think a lot of people forget that the police are separate to the justice system. They don't make the rules and of course aren't the ones who decide who's guilty or what punishment they get. I'm sure they, just like most law abiding citizens and decent people, would rather see the real criminals getting much longer sentences than what they do. Like this week, the guy who was already a known criminal out on a 'suspended sentence' who punched and killed that completely innocent guy and only got 4 1/2 years - in the words of the victims' family, "An absolutely joke!" I did hear it's being looked into for a review of the sentence though.

So I was saying yesterday that we're going around in circles a bit here. It's a huge subject and I understand the points you've made and do sympathise with those who genuinely have been treated unfairly before. I just have a different opinion on a lot of it than you, mainly that I blame those who cause trouble at football in the first place for a lot of the consequences for others that follow. It's a Friday night and it may not sound like it the way I ramble on, but again I'm just going to have to suggest agreeing to disagree on a lot of this now. If a haven't bored to death, feel free to keep it going or have the last word though mate!......

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Mapletree Flag Croydon 28 Feb 14 7.24pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Quote Johnny D at 28 Feb 2014 7.06pm

Quote soulboy at 28 Feb 2014 1.16pm

Quote Johnny D at 27 Feb 2014 10.23pm

Quote Breamy11 at 27 Feb 2014 9.56pm

Can someone fill me in on how to say acab please? A.C.A.B OR EY-cab or a-cab


Not sure if you're serious there, but if so, maybe you should ask the families of those two poor girls who got murdered in Manchester when they were tricked into thinking they were responding to a burglar? Just saying, you know. 99.9% of them are regular people just trying to do a good job, with a few who shouldn't be there, just like 99.9% of Palace fans are decent people, with just a few idiots who we could all do without. You always get a few, but it is only ever just a few.

JD, you're beginning to sound like the official police spokesperson on HOL!! Yes, there are some jokers on here who think it clever to use the ACAB acronym, however there are also a number of valid posts that provide informed and personal insight into police treatment of football fans, suggesting the police approach is at times heavy handed, disproportionate and yes, corrupt. These views alone seriously challenge your position which appears to be 'you have nothing to fear from the police at football matches because even if you are arrested it won't go anywhere, because they (police) need evidence'. However, the clear message from some of us is that it is often the police alone who produce the necessary evidence for the Crown Prosecution Service, by providing witness statements corroborating one another! This policy is in the usual course of events fine but at football matches where police (according to testimonies here) are arguably biased and disproportionate in their actions, the ramifications for the 'ordinary fan' can be devastating!!

A spokesperson wouldn't give any form of opinion at all! But that's all I'm doing here. That last post was only in response to the one before. Only a joke he may feel, or perhaps he is actually ignorant or just naive enough to actually believe that. But like that other guy said, it's kind of ironic to use it when he's very likely to be one of the ones who feels 'football fans are treated harshly and all labelled as the same troublemakers by the police'.

Knowing a few Old Bill, I think the majority would much rather be doing what they signed up for, directly helping people by catching the bad guys (probably in a fast car!), those ones burgling your houses and mugging your grans - Not standing outside a football ground in the cold and rain on a Saturday afternoon when it's supposed to be their day off! But like I said before, football definitely isn't rugby or cricket where all the fans sit together and generally get along is it, so they have a need to be there.

Anyway, my responses to you, 'mapletree' and 'lyons550' yesterday were more relevant to what we've been going on about, if you haven't seen them. From the last thing you've said today, i can only add that I don't think that being at football would be regarded by an officer as a differentiating factor (in terms of when you've mentioned writing their statements about what happened and how the person behaved etc). By that I mean, if a person acted the very same way outside a nightclub or a shop, they'd be writing almost exactly the same thing about it all.

Now whether that person eventually pleaded/got found guilty and then got treated differently by the courts, just because it happened to be at a football match or was 'football related', perhaps they would. Is that fair? Perhaps not. Perhaps it depends in the factors, such as a pre-organised football fight could be seen as worse than a completely sporadic one in a Town Centre, even if they ended up as the same type of fight (because of the planning involved and prior intent to be violent in public). Just a random example of how they could see things differently to another, I'm not saying I necessarily agree it should matter.

You seem knowledgable, but I think a lot of people forget that the police are separate to the justice system. They don't make the rules and of course aren't the ones who decide who's guilty or what punishment they get. I'm sure they, just like most law abiding citizens and decent people, would rather see the real criminals getting much longer sentences than what they do. Like this week, the guy who was already a known criminal out on a 'suspended sentence' who punched and killed that completely innocent guy and only got 4 1/2 years - in the words of the victims' family, "An absolutely joke!" I did hear it's being looked into for a review of the sentence though.

So I was saying yesterday that we're going around in circles a bit here. It's a huge subject and I understand the points you've made and do sympathise with those who genuinely have been treated unfairly before. I just have a different opinion on a lot of it than you, mainly that I blame those who cause trouble at football in the first place for a lot of the consequences for others that follow. It's a Friday night and it may not sound like it the way I ramble on, but again I'm just going to have to suggest agreeing to disagree on a lot of this now. If a haven't bored to death, feel free to keep it going or have the last word though mate!......


I didn't actually understand Breany's point, it didn't seem nasty to me but I guess it was a whoosh as far as I am concerned

Yes, going round in circles. I have worked for two Constabularies. Generally the top brass were sharp as hell, the rest less so.

I think the concern of many of us is that, in plenty of circumstances, the Police also act as judge and jury. Sometimes it's best to take a Police caution than take a risk on going to Magistrates Court and let's face it many Magistrates aren't that great either. The Police certainly do back each other up so that justice is not always served. Maybe not in Crown Court but who ends up there?

What really crawls up my nose and dies is the tin hitlers, as it appears the two that are involved with the HF and Portmanor issues must be. All I have seen suggests there is absolutely no reason for the pressure being put on the Portmanor except it's the HF pub, largely the HF has done little wrong but it's a worry because it's hard to control. So these guardians of our souls take it upon themselves to bear down unreasonably on a group.

We should all support that group, they are important to us. And if there are one or two idiots surely we can forgive them that as long as they aren't too wild.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
kevpofcpfc Flag 28 Feb 14 7.40pm Send a Private Message to kevpofcpfc Add kevpofcpfc as a friend

My girlfrinds a Copper....

But she insists she's strawberry blonde...

Ginger innit

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
PsychoPaul Flag 01 Mar 14 1.59am Send a Private Message to PsychoPaul Add PsychoPaul as a friend

Quote kevpofcpfc at 28 Feb 2014 7.40pm

My girlfrinds a Copper....

But she insists she's strawberry blonde...

Ginger innit


No offence to everyone else but this is the best response to my thread :-)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
PsychoPaul Flag 05 Mar 14 7.46pm Send a Private Message to PsychoPaul Add PsychoPaul as a friend

[Link]


A coach full of troublemakers, including disabled and kids.

According to some of the previous posters they must have deserved it and guilty of something else the police would have left them alone.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
PsychoPaul Flag 05 Mar 14 7.47pm Send a Private Message to PsychoPaul Add PsychoPaul as a friend

I guess I have to be careful by assuming a Daily Mail story is true thou eh!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Mapletree Flag Croydon 05 Mar 14 8.33pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Quote PsychoPaul at 05 Mar 2014 7.47pm

I guess I have to be careful by assuming a Daily Mail story is true thou eh!


Hey PsychoPaul, why aren't you on the BBC3 thread showing your support to Cartoon Head?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
turbohorsebox Flag Coulsdon 06 Mar 14 1.17pm Send a Private Message to turbohorsebox Add turbohorsebox as a friend

Quote adrian b at 28 Feb 2014 3.36pm


A really good and open thread this. Anyone who has been stopped and breatherlysed for driving out of a pub car park for no other reason than where they have come from, can see the point being made here. You would hope that the boys in blue might use their training, experience and common sense in these circunstances, but more often than not their action is based on steriotyping drivers and pub goers. The same very much goes for football fans, as far as ol' bill is concerned.

A very good analogy. If you haven't been drinking theres nothing to worry about and you're on your way in a couple of minutes. If you have you deserve a ban.

And yes, I like to drink way too much, but I know not to drive afterwards. Same with knowing how to behave at football.

 


All good. Nothing bad.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
PsychoPaul Flag 06 Mar 14 10.37pm Send a Private Message to PsychoPaul Add PsychoPaul as a friend

Quote Mapletree at 05 Mar 2014 8.33pm

Quote PsychoPaul at 05 Mar 2014 7.47pm

I guess I have to be careful by assuming a Daily Mail story is true thou eh!


Hey PsychoPaul, why aren't you on the BBC3 thread showing your support to Cartoon Head?


Had to google that! I don't watch much telly, looks good thou. The psycho bit is due to psychobilly music and my psycho tendencies ;-)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 5 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > acab...!