This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
soulboy Lewisham 28 Feb 14 1.16pm | |
---|---|
Quote Johnny D at 27 Feb 2014 10.23pm
Quote Breamy11 at 27 Feb 2014 9.56pm
Can someone fill me in on how to say acab please? A.C.A.B OR EY-cab or a-cab
JD, you're beginning to sound like the official police spokesperson on HOL!! Yes, there are some jokers on here who think it clever to use the ACAB acronym, however there are also a number of valid posts that provide informed and personal insight into police treatment of football fans, suggesting the police approach is at times heavy handed, disproportionate and yes, corrupt. These views alone seriously challenge your position which appears to be 'you have nothing to fear from the police at football matches because even if you are arrested it won't go anywhere, because they (police) need evidence'. However, the clear message from some of us is that it is often the police alone who produce the necessary evidence for the Crown Prosecution Service, by providing witness statements corroborating one another! This policy is in the usual course of events fine but at football matches where police (according to testimonies here) are arguably biased and disproportionate in their actions, the ramifications for the 'ordinary fan' can be devastating!!
"Deviance is a freedom enjoyed in a city of lightly engaged strangers" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 28 Feb 14 1.50pm | |
---|---|
Quote Mapletree at 27 Feb 2014 12.50pm
Quote Mapletree at 27 Feb 2014 12.47pm
The one thing I will say again is that those FEW idiots who throw stuff, fight up town, run on the pitch, smash up seats, interfere with stewards, light bangers or whatever, even that odd person with the knife etc etc, they don't exactly do the rest of us any favours do they!? Unfortunately unless these things stop, however minor some people may regard them, I don't think things are going to change much. As for the HF, well I generally feel a bit sorry for them. They do a good job, but again a few idiots (members, non members, tag alongs, people in the same block, whatever you want to call them), keep letting them and the club down with their stupid behaviour. ------------------------------------- The answer given here, with which I totally agree, is that is because they are an easy target that those in authority have been able to demonize. And if we do nothing about that it is likely to get worse not better until we are all sitting throughout every match, probably with seat belts and crash helmets on. Look at how long it's taking to get safe standing ffs. You can stand at a concert, you can stand in some theatres but you can't stand at football which is where you really want to. Just make sure tickets apply to specific sections and control access, job done. But of course, fans can't be trusted.... Edited by Mapletree (27 Feb 2014 12.47pm)
Edited by EverybodyDannsNow (28 Feb 2014 1.50pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
adrian b Landrindod, Wales 28 Feb 14 3.36pm | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Johnny D Beckenham 28 Feb 14 7.06pm | |
---|---|
Quote soulboy at 28 Feb 2014 1.16pm
Quote Johnny D at 27 Feb 2014 10.23pm
Quote Breamy11 at 27 Feb 2014 9.56pm
Can someone fill me in on how to say acab please? A.C.A.B OR EY-cab or a-cab
JD, you're beginning to sound like the official police spokesperson on HOL!! Yes, there are some jokers on here who think it clever to use the ACAB acronym, however there are also a number of valid posts that provide informed and personal insight into police treatment of football fans, suggesting the police approach is at times heavy handed, disproportionate and yes, corrupt. These views alone seriously challenge your position which appears to be 'you have nothing to fear from the police at football matches because even if you are arrested it won't go anywhere, because they (police) need evidence'. However, the clear message from some of us is that it is often the police alone who produce the necessary evidence for the Crown Prosecution Service, by providing witness statements corroborating one another! This policy is in the usual course of events fine but at football matches where police (according to testimonies here) are arguably biased and disproportionate in their actions, the ramifications for the 'ordinary fan' can be devastating!! A spokesperson wouldn't give any form of opinion at all! But that's all I'm doing here. That last post was only in response to the one before. Only a joke he may feel, or perhaps he is actually ignorant or just naive enough to actually believe that. But like that other guy said, it's kind of ironic to use it when he's very likely to be one of the ones who feels 'football fans are treated harshly and all labelled as the same troublemakers by the police'. Knowing a few Old Bill, I think the majority would much rather be doing what they signed up for, directly helping people by catching the bad guys (probably in a fast car!), those ones burgling your houses and mugging your grans - Not standing outside a football ground in the cold and rain on a Saturday afternoon when it's supposed to be their day off! But like I said before, football definitely isn't rugby or cricket where all the fans sit together and generally get along is it, so they have a need to be there. Anyway, my responses to you, 'mapletree' and 'lyons550' yesterday were more relevant to what we've been going on about, if you haven't seen them. From the last thing you've said today, i can only add that I don't think that being at football would be regarded by an officer as a differentiating factor (in terms of when you've mentioned writing their statements about what happened and how the person behaved etc). By that I mean, if a person acted the very same way outside a nightclub or a shop, they'd be writing almost exactly the same thing about it all. Now whether that person eventually pleaded/got found guilty and then got treated differently by the courts, just because it happened to be at a football match or was 'football related', perhaps they would. Is that fair? Perhaps not. Perhaps it depends in the factors, such as a pre-organised football fight could be seen as worse than a completely sporadic one in a Town Centre, even if they ended up as the same type of fight (because of the planning involved and prior intent to be violent in public). Just a random example of how they could see things differently to another, I'm not saying I necessarily agree it should matter. You seem knowledgable, but I think a lot of people forget that the police are separate to the justice system. They don't make the rules and of course aren't the ones who decide who's guilty or what punishment they get. I'm sure they, just like most law abiding citizens and decent people, would rather see the real criminals getting much longer sentences than what they do. Like this week, the guy who was already a known criminal out on a 'suspended sentence' who punched and killed that completely innocent guy and only got 4 1/2 years - in the words of the victims' family, "An absolutely joke!" I did hear it's being looked into for a review of the sentence though. So I was saying yesterday that we're going around in circles a bit here. It's a huge subject and I understand the points you've made and do sympathise with those who genuinely have been treated unfairly before. I just have a different opinion on a lot of it than you, mainly that I blame those who cause trouble at football in the first place for a lot of the consequences for others that follow. It's a Friday night and it may not sound like it the way I ramble on, but again I'm just going to have to suggest agreeing to disagree on a lot of this now. If a haven't bored to death, feel free to keep it going or have the last word though mate!......
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 28 Feb 14 7.24pm | |
---|---|
Quote Johnny D at 28 Feb 2014 7.06pm
Quote soulboy at 28 Feb 2014 1.16pm
Quote Johnny D at 27 Feb 2014 10.23pm
Quote Breamy11 at 27 Feb 2014 9.56pm
Can someone fill me in on how to say acab please? A.C.A.B OR EY-cab or a-cab
JD, you're beginning to sound like the official police spokesperson on HOL!! Yes, there are some jokers on here who think it clever to use the ACAB acronym, however there are also a number of valid posts that provide informed and personal insight into police treatment of football fans, suggesting the police approach is at times heavy handed, disproportionate and yes, corrupt. These views alone seriously challenge your position which appears to be 'you have nothing to fear from the police at football matches because even if you are arrested it won't go anywhere, because they (police) need evidence'. However, the clear message from some of us is that it is often the police alone who produce the necessary evidence for the Crown Prosecution Service, by providing witness statements corroborating one another! This policy is in the usual course of events fine but at football matches where police (according to testimonies here) are arguably biased and disproportionate in their actions, the ramifications for the 'ordinary fan' can be devastating!! A spokesperson wouldn't give any form of opinion at all! But that's all I'm doing here. That last post was only in response to the one before. Only a joke he may feel, or perhaps he is actually ignorant or just naive enough to actually believe that. But like that other guy said, it's kind of ironic to use it when he's very likely to be one of the ones who feels 'football fans are treated harshly and all labelled as the same troublemakers by the police'. Knowing a few Old Bill, I think the majority would much rather be doing what they signed up for, directly helping people by catching the bad guys (probably in a fast car!), those ones burgling your houses and mugging your grans - Not standing outside a football ground in the cold and rain on a Saturday afternoon when it's supposed to be their day off! But like I said before, football definitely isn't rugby or cricket where all the fans sit together and generally get along is it, so they have a need to be there. Anyway, my responses to you, 'mapletree' and 'lyons550' yesterday were more relevant to what we've been going on about, if you haven't seen them. From the last thing you've said today, i can only add that I don't think that being at football would be regarded by an officer as a differentiating factor (in terms of when you've mentioned writing their statements about what happened and how the person behaved etc). By that I mean, if a person acted the very same way outside a nightclub or a shop, they'd be writing almost exactly the same thing about it all. Now whether that person eventually pleaded/got found guilty and then got treated differently by the courts, just because it happened to be at a football match or was 'football related', perhaps they would. Is that fair? Perhaps not. Perhaps it depends in the factors, such as a pre-organised football fight could be seen as worse than a completely sporadic one in a Town Centre, even if they ended up as the same type of fight (because of the planning involved and prior intent to be violent in public). Just a random example of how they could see things differently to another, I'm not saying I necessarily agree it should matter. You seem knowledgable, but I think a lot of people forget that the police are separate to the justice system. They don't make the rules and of course aren't the ones who decide who's guilty or what punishment they get. I'm sure they, just like most law abiding citizens and decent people, would rather see the real criminals getting much longer sentences than what they do. Like this week, the guy who was already a known criminal out on a 'suspended sentence' who punched and killed that completely innocent guy and only got 4 1/2 years - in the words of the victims' family, "An absolutely joke!" I did hear it's being looked into for a review of the sentence though. So I was saying yesterday that we're going around in circles a bit here. It's a huge subject and I understand the points you've made and do sympathise with those who genuinely have been treated unfairly before. I just have a different opinion on a lot of it than you, mainly that I blame those who cause trouble at football in the first place for a lot of the consequences for others that follow. It's a Friday night and it may not sound like it the way I ramble on, but again I'm just going to have to suggest agreeing to disagree on a lot of this now. If a haven't bored to death, feel free to keep it going or have the last word though mate!......
Yes, going round in circles. I have worked for two Constabularies. Generally the top brass were sharp as hell, the rest less so. I think the concern of many of us is that, in plenty of circumstances, the Police also act as judge and jury. Sometimes it's best to take a Police caution than take a risk on going to Magistrates Court and let's face it many Magistrates aren't that great either. The Police certainly do back each other up so that justice is not always served. Maybe not in Crown Court but who ends up there? What really crawls up my nose and dies is the tin hitlers, as it appears the two that are involved with the HF and Portmanor issues must be. All I have seen suggests there is absolutely no reason for the pressure being put on the Portmanor except it's the HF pub, largely the HF has done little wrong but it's a worry because it's hard to control. So these guardians of our souls take it upon themselves to bear down unreasonably on a group. We should all support that group, they are important to us. And if there are one or two idiots surely we can forgive them that as long as they aren't too wild.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
kevpofcpfc 28 Feb 14 7.40pm | |
---|---|
My girlfrinds a Copper.... But she insists she's strawberry blonde... Ginger innit
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PsychoPaul 01 Mar 14 1.59am | |
---|---|
Quote kevpofcpfc at 28 Feb 2014 7.40pm
My girlfrinds a Copper.... But she insists she's strawberry blonde... Ginger innit
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PsychoPaul 05 Mar 14 7.46pm | |
---|---|
According to some of the previous posters they must have deserved it and guilty of something else the police would have left them alone.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PsychoPaul 05 Mar 14 7.47pm | |
---|---|
I guess I have to be careful by assuming a Daily Mail story is true thou eh!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 05 Mar 14 8.33pm | |
---|---|
Quote PsychoPaul at 05 Mar 2014 7.47pm
I guess I have to be careful by assuming a Daily Mail story is true thou eh!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
turbohorsebox Coulsdon 06 Mar 14 1.17pm | |
---|---|
Quote adrian b at 28 Feb 2014 3.36pm
A very good analogy. If you haven't been drinking theres nothing to worry about and you're on your way in a couple of minutes. If you have you deserve a ban. And yes, I like to drink way too much, but I know not to drive afterwards. Same with knowing how to behave at football.
All good. Nothing bad. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PsychoPaul 06 Mar 14 10.37pm | |
---|---|
Quote Mapletree at 05 Mar 2014 8.33pm
Quote PsychoPaul at 05 Mar 2014 7.47pm
I guess I have to be careful by assuming a Daily Mail story is true thou eh!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.