This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Cham's pen
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Mapletree  Croydon 10 Feb 14 1.16pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 10 Feb 2014 1.04pm
Quote Joeberto at 09 Feb 2014 3.05pm
Quote Plane at 09 Feb 2014 2.58pm
Quote StainesPalace at 09 Feb 2014 9.01am
Keeper clearly won the ball was never a penalty. Great finish tho. I think we'll end up playing Chamakh and Murray up front.
Yep, Foster did get a touch but if he hadn't slid through and brought Cham down he would have strode on and knocked it into an empty net! Pen all the way. From the referees angle I don't think he'd have seen it. Its took me a few replays to see that it might not have been a penalty. Managers have the benefit of bias and replays to make their decision, but the referee has to call it. The manager complaining that if it was a penalty the keeper should have been sent off is absurd. The Referee I think made a good call. Penalty and no card.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| madcap_v2 SE25 / Ibiza 10 Feb 14 1.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Definitely wasn't a penalty IMO but regardless, the ref gave it and it was stuck away very well by Chammers
La la la your mum |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Plane Bromley 10 Feb 14 1.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote madcap_v2 at 10 Feb 2014 1.29pm
Definitely wasn't a penalty IMO but regardless, the ref gave it and it was stuck away very well by Chammers
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| paperhat croydon 10 Feb 14 1.37pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I'd naively assumed that if you follow through and tak eout a player, it doesnt matter if you touch the ball or not first, its still a foul? What I don't get is what happened with this on sat. If Chamakh dive, he should have been given a yellow, if Foster took him out then he should have had a yellow or red. Either way , there should have been a card given?
Clinton is Clinton. I have known him for a long time, I know his mother... Simon Jordan |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Plane Bromley 10 Feb 14 1.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote paperhat at 10 Feb 2014 1.37pm
I'd naively assumed that if you follow through and tak eout a player, it doesnt matter if you touch the ball or not first, its still a foul? What I don't get is what happened with this on sat. If Chamakh dive, he should have been given a yellow, if Foster took him out then he should have had a yellow or red. Either way , there should have been a card given? Of course you're correct. I agree, it should have been a yellow for the keeper.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| palace99 New Mills 10 Feb 14 2.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Plane at 10 Feb 2014 1.40pm
Quote paperhat at 10 Feb 2014 1.37pm
I'd naively assumed that if you follow through and tak eout a player, it doesnt matter if you touch the ball or not first, its still a foul? What I don't get is what happened with this on sat. If Chamakh dive, he should have been given a yellow, if Foster took him out then he should have had a yellow or red. Either way , there should have been a card given? Of course you're correct. I agree, it should have been a yellow for the keeper.
A foul for me is if you don't take the ball first and/or you go in in a dangerous way. I don't think Foster was particularly dangerous and he definitely touched the ball first, hence it was a fortunate penalty imho. Would you have been happy if Jules had conceded one in the same circumstances??
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Arthur Blackpudding  10 Feb 14 3.57pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Seeing it from the Holmesdale I said straight away I didn't think it was a penalty. However when you see it from different angles on MOTD I can see why it was awarded. To me if you get the ball first, it's a good tackle. I'd have been very pissed off if we conceded a penalty like that.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hoof Hearted 10 Feb 14 4.34pm | |
|---|---|
|
The keeper did touch the ball, but by up ending Chamakh prevented him from collecting the ball afterwards, which he would have done easily. Penalty all day long.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Plane Bromley 10 Feb 14 6.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 10 Feb 2014 4.34pm
The keeper did touch the ball, but by up ending Chamakh prevented him from collecting the ball afterwards, which he would have done easily. Penalty all day long.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
bodge  10 Feb 14 6.44pm |
|
|---|---|
|
It was a pen he did not get the ball clear of Chamakh so it was a foul.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 10 Feb 14 7.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 10 Feb 2014 4.34pm
The keeper did touch the ball, but by up ending Chamakh prevented him from collecting the ball afterwards, which he would have done easily. Penalty all day long.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Ljb Sutton 10 Feb 14 7.37pm |
|
|---|---|
|
When I saw it in the game I couldn't believe the ref had given it as it looked like he clearly got the ball first. Still think it was a bit of a soft penalty, but not going to complain and can see why it was given
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.