This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Dec 17 4.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
You missed out the step between being warned about moving his hands and then being told to crawl before getting shot. He was doing his best to comply with contradictory and, frankly, weird, instructions from the cops. Why didn't one of them go over and cuff him when he was face down with his hands behind his back? Why make him crawl to you when you can walk to him? This was just crazy. But then, just look at the guy who did the shooting... Entirely this. How poor is the training of the officers that they can't arrest a single, unarmed man, prone and begging for his life, who clearly isn't armed. Its almost as if they were constructing an excuse to shoot him. The whole exercise seemed more about humiliating and dominating the guy than arresting him. Instead of rightly castigating the police, and holding them accountable, for completely f**king up and killing a guy; the system has served to stoop to a new low. What happens now, if you're pulled over by a cop, should you shoot first, and claim you were 'in fear for your life' having seen incidents where innocent people are killed by cops like this?
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ray in Houston Houston 11 Dec 17 4.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
That's absurd; because as you state, and untrained person wouldn't be in a position to respond to police summons. Its worth noting, that had that happened in Afghanistan or Iraq, they'd have been tried and likely convicted.
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ray in Houston Houston 11 Dec 17 4.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Entirely this. How poor is the training of the officers that they can't arrest a single, unarmed man, prone and begging for his life, who clearly isn't armed. Its almost as if they were constructing an excuse to shoot him. The whole exercise seemed more about humiliating and dominating the guy than arresting him. Instead of rightly castigating the police, and holding them accountable, for completely f**king up and killing a guy; the system has served to stoop to a new low. What happens now, if you're pulled over by a cop, should you shoot first, and claim you were 'in fear for your life' having seen incidents where innocent people are killed by cops like this?
I have been in the same circumstance in which Philando Castile was shot. Worse, actually, as I was doing over 50mph in a 35mph zone (by mistake, thinking I was on a freeway on ramp but I'd actually missed that turn). I did everything the same as Castile, except that I didn't have a gun (and am white). Castile got four bullets, I got let off with a warning. I would've given me a ticket.
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnfirewall 11 Dec 17 6.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
Meanwhile, All Lives Matter is deafeningly silent. [Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
7mins In the bush 11 Dec 17 7.12pm | |
---|---|
You think it was a premeditated act?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
7mins In the bush 11 Dec 17 7.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
Now, a black man getting arrested and in complete compliance can still get shot by cops (Philando Castile being one). But you are correct that a heavily armed citizenry means that cops - who are supposed to "serve and protect" are on such an edge that they will shoot first before even thinking about asking questions. Philando was told not to move after saying he was carrying a gun. Even his fiancée admits he then moved (to get his liciense). So I'm confused where this "complete compliance" comes from.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ray in Houston Houston 11 Dec 17 7.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by 7mins
Philando was told not to move after saying he was carrying a gun. Even his fiancée admits he then moved (to get his liciense). So I'm confused where this "complete compliance" comes from. Which deserves four bullets from point blank range? Where was the threat?
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
7mins In the bush 11 Dec 17 7.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Don't try to defend the Shaver shooting, the cop in question was out of order and control. That guy posed no threat at all and its a f**king power trip of a guy in uniform with an assault rifle. At no point was that cops life even remotely in danger or threat, either before he fired or during the time he fired. I've merely given the facts, do you deny he was told if he moves his hands he will be shot? Is any of the above not true? This awful incident is a symptom of a deeper problem. America has a gun culture.... Cops are nervous... These things will continue to happen.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
7mins In the bush 11 Dec 17 7.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
Which deserves four bullets from point blank range? Where was the threat? I've never said there was... I'm pointing out that he didn't offer "complete compliance" Hindsight tells us he was reaching for his license. Do you know what BLM put on twitter after he was shot? They said "another PoC shot by a trigger happy white cop" Do you know the ethnicity of the cop was? Asian.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
7mins In the bush 11 Dec 17 7.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
Which deserves four bullets from point blank range? Where was the threat? Its easier to discuss this if we stick to the facts... Complete compliance is not true. Like the "hands up, don't shoot" in the Michael Brown case. Facts pls... Not made up stuff to support a agenda
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 11 Dec 17 8.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by 7mins
You think it was a premeditated act? Murder doesn't have to be premeditated does it?
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ray in Houston Houston 11 Dec 17 8.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by 7mins
I've never said there was... I'm pointing out that he didn't offer "complete compliance" Hindsight tells us he was reaching for his license.
The question I asked is still unanswered: at what point was Castile a threat to the officer? He testified that he never saw the gun...
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.