In many ways it’s healthy because some of our people also spend time overseas and gain very valuable experience as a result.

Conventions need to be agreed internationally and ratified individually.

Can you see the kind of changes you seem to want being successfully adopted?

The days are long gone when we could just impose our ideas on others.

It might be obsolete for you, but it’s what we have, so we had better find more practical solutions than expecting the rules to be changed just to suit us.

Going full on isolation would stop the flow, but not improve anything at home. It would also reduce trade dramatically and affect us so much that it would soon be reversed.

Our enemies don’t all arrive with guns. Although do seem to acquire them once they are here !

They have a doctrine which doesn’t need a weapon. Just loads of silly westerners thinking it’s ok to live by the ramblings of a soapy book.

Don’t think it makes any difference. pakistan is listed without any special notes and in a document like this there would probably be. You would need to be a specialist in this area to be certain.

pakistan was not a Commonwealth country on 1/1/73 therefore pakistanis were not Commonwealth Citizens. There is a possibility that many of the offenders were not in the UK then, unless born here. Without any knowledge of individual cases I would surmise many came over as dependants or spouses after 1/1/73. In HO case working, pakistan nationals were not treated as Comminwealth Citizens, indeed they had there own case working section, as I assume the powers that be, thought they would rejoin at anytime ( I spent a lovely 2 years in that section)