Violence eh, a chink in the armour of morality beginning to show. Might be the reality of a trump win coming to pass.

The recording artist Moby unwittingly reveals that the intelligence service colluded with him to spread the Steele dossier accusation that Trump was a Russian agent....something that the inquiry proved they knew all along was misinformation.

This goes on all the time and is of course completely out of order that intelligence/security services worked against a sitting president. Even worse when there was no proof.

[Tweet Link]

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Indeed, lying and deception is as common to them as breathing.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Oh goodie a man who uses social media to amplify hateful lies and pour misery onto bereaved parents (and endanger them in the process due to morons believing his rants and targeting them) has been let back onto Twitter.

Just days before the anniversary of Sandy Hook no less. Great work, Elon!

If you bothered to watch his trial you'd have seen him row back and forth as to whether or not he believed Sandy Hook was a conspiracy. And perhaps one would argue that if he felt any legitimate remorse he'd have turned up to the final judgement and show contrition rather than broadcast live online from miles away mocking the whole process.

Therefore no, I can't accept his apology. Also reference he only offered a meek apology when he knew he was going to be sued for defamation. What a stand up guy, eh?

As to your word soup about me personally using social media for hate - nope, can't say I do. My expectation is that social media platforms take a view on disallowing those who make up/repudiate vile lies and target individuals as it can lead to incredibly negative outcomes.

People mistake using an internet website as their right to total free speech no matter what they say. Many, including this one, have rules stating the contrary. And I can't say the Hol has ever infringed my freedom of speech!

Just because someone says the CIA asked him to do something doesn’t mean they did! Indeed it seems incredibly unlikely they would officially. They would arrange things under the radar.

Does this guy really have friends in the intelligence community, or is he just fantasising?

What would be the point? It would not influence the enquiry which effectively produced a “not proven” verdict because Trump was a sitting President at the time. At the time the Steele report was commissioned he wasn’t. He was a candidate.

The CIA has a duty to the USA. That’s where its loyalty is founded. Not in who happens to be, or wants to be, the President. Should there be any suspicion that anyone, President or not, is being disloyal then they have a duty to investigate. If there is nothing to see then nothing will be seen.

Something was seen. It was though hidden from view by Bill Barr so we haven’t yet seen it. It still exists though, so maybe we will, if it becomes necessary. Don’t bet on Trump.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.