This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
nead1 06 Dec 23 10.04am | |
---|---|
The fundamental issue, quite aside from the flack constantly thrown towards WE, is whether his analysis is correct - "Biden's strengths are in building and then quietly leading an effective team". In this context, I think he is 100% right and Biden has demonstrated that ability time and again throughout his long career. His judgement is steady, he acts in the best interests of the US and wider world and, as WE points, "even in a care home he would be a better President than Trump could ever be" Where I slightly depart from WE is his view that Trump is a master orator. Nor for me - he simply peddles a lot of ill informed nonsense usually delivered in a child like/simplistic manner. There is no real or serious analysis of anything as he simply doesn't have the intellectual capability to do that. Equally, I think Biden will be the Democratic candidate (not a stalking horse for someone else) and he will win in 24.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 06 Dec 23 10.18am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nead1
The fundamental issue, quite aside from the flack constantly thrown towards WE, is whether his analysis is correct - "Biden's strengths are in building and then quietly leading an effective team". In this context, I think he is 100% right and Biden has demonstrated that ability time and again throughout his long career. His judgement is steady, he acts in the best interests of the US and wider world and, as WE points, "even in a care home he would be a better President than Trump could ever be" Where I slightly depart from WE is his view that Trump is a master orator. Nor for me - he simply peddles a lot of ill informed nonsense usually delivered in a child like/simplistic manner. There is no real or serious analysis of anything as he simply doesn't have the intellectual capability to do that. Equally, I think Biden will be the Democratic candidate (not a stalking horse for someone else) and he will win in 24. For me the fundamental issue, regardless of whatever strengths or weaknesses they each may have, is that they're both too old.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 06 Dec 23 10.18am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nead1
The fundamental issue, quite aside from the flack constantly thrown towards WE, is whether his analysis is correct - "Biden's strengths are in building and then quietly leading an effective team". In this context, I think he is 100% right and Biden has demonstrated that ability time and again throughout his long career. His judgement is steady, he acts in the best interests of the US and wider world and, as WE points, "even in a care home he would be a better President than Trump could ever be" Where I slightly depart from WE is his view that Trump is a master orator. Nor for me - he simply peddles a lot of ill informed nonsense usually delivered in a child like/simplistic manner. There is no real or serious analysis of anything as he simply doesn't have the intellectual capability to do that. Equally, I think Biden will be the Democratic candidate (not a stalking horse for someone else) and he will win in 24. I can't help but feel that you are going to be somewhat disappointed. Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Dec 2023 10.19am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 06 Dec 23 3.02pm | |
---|---|
We regularly hear from a particular poster that Biden will drop out and be replaced by a more electable option....whatever you think of that. I suppose it's possible but I doubt it personally, for several different reasons. However, here is Biden himself stating that he's running and not dropping out.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 06 Dec 23 3.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nead1
The fundamental issue, quite aside from the flack constantly thrown towards WE, is whether his analysis is correct - "Biden's strengths are in building and then quietly leading an effective team". In this context, I think he is 100% right and Biden has demonstrated that ability time and again throughout his long career. His judgement is steady, he acts in the best interests of the US and wider world and, as WE points, "even in a care home he would be a better President than Trump could ever be" Where I slightly depart from WE is his view that Trump is a master orator. Nor for me - he simply peddles a lot of ill informed nonsense usually delivered in a child like/simplistic manner. There is no real or serious analysis of anything as he simply doesn't have the intellectual capability to do that. Equally, I think Biden will be the Democratic candidate (not a stalking horse for someone else) and he will win in 24. Thanks for the support. It’s much appreciated. I also think Trump peddles nonsense but that he does it in a very effective way to the audience it is aimed at. A master is probably going too far but to my mind it’s his only strength. Time will tell if Biden will drop out but I think he will do whatever is required to avoid another Trump Presidency. It has to be every right thing American’s priority.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 06 Dec 23 3.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
For me the fundamental issue, regardless of whatever strengths or weaknesses they each may have, is that they're both too old. There are but there is, thank goodness, only one Trump and it’s his shadow which hangs over all of this. Biden said yesterday that it’s unlikely he would be running if Trump wasn’t. I think his hat is in the ring to draw the fire from the right wing media but there is a plan for next year which sees him withdraw. It all depends on Trump and what happens to him and the ratings after the cases are decided.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 06 Dec 23 3.23pm | |
---|---|
Don't be surprised if there is an attempt on Trump's life. I put nothing past these people....they would love it and rejoice.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 06 Dec 23 7.13pm | |
---|---|
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sues U.S. State Department for conspiring to censor American media companies: [Tweet Link]
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 07 Dec 23 7.13am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don’t read social media platforms for news let alone for gossip! The reason being it is full of this kind of garbage. I have more productive things to do and more reliable sources to use. Like reading gas regulation guides?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 07 Dec 23 9.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Don't be surprised if there is an attempt on Trump's life. I put nothing past these people....they would love it and rejoice. I have been expecting that for a long time. Of course, they have done the lone gunman thing too many times already so an 'accident' would be more likely, or even more probable, a 'heart attack'.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 07 Dec 23 9.28am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I have been expecting that for a long time. Of course, they have done the lone gunman thing too many times already so an 'accident' would be more likely, or even more probable, a 'heart attack'. Unlikely in the short term as it would be hoped that his past will overtake his future before it might be thought necessary. If however he did win a second term I can well imagine there might be some who thought it was then. Whether that would translate into action is another matter. It might depend on who was VP. They could be as bad.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 07 Dec 23 10.12am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Unlikely in the short term as it would be hoped that his past will overtake his future before it might be thought necessary. If however he did win a second term I can well imagine there might be some who thought it was then. Whether that would translate into action is another matter. It might depend on who was VP. They could be as bad. I'm sure you'll be celebrating if it happens.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.