This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
steeleye20 Croydon 05 Dec 16 12.32pm | |
---|---|
Good Day brexit fans and the Attorney General is telling their majesties the Supreme Court that 'they must not deny the will of the people.' That's outside the Court of course. So Judges X1 1 Government 0 I think but its all to play for. All the Judges are fit but Delaney not playing so could be vulnerable on the set-pieces. Costs to be met by the tax-payer. Ratings in January by Garth Crooks.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
susmik PLYMOUTH -But Made in Old Coulsdon... 05 Dec 16 3.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Good Day brexit fans and the Attorney General is telling their majesties the Supreme Court that 'they must not deny the will of the people.' That's outside the Court of course. So Judges X1 1 Government 0 I think but its all to play for. All the Judges are fit but Delaney not playing so could be vulnerable on the set-pieces. Costs to be met by the tax-payer. Ratings in January by Garth Crooks.
You really do need help old man!
Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 05 Dec 16 3.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Good Day brexit fans and the Attorney General is telling their majesties the Supreme Court that 'they must not deny the will of the people.' That's outside the Court of course. So Judges X1 1 Government 0 I think but its all to play for. All the Judges are fit but Delaney not playing so could be vulnerable on the set-pieces. Costs to be met by the tax-payer. Ratings in January by Garth Crooks.
Thanks Steeleye. Have they announced who is on the bench? I think they'll need a solid defence and someone good to cut in from the left to counter the strong right defenders. Here wig go here wig go here wig go. Edited by Mapletree (05 Dec 2016 3.35pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 05 Dec 16 3.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Thanks Steeleye. Have they announced who is on the bench? I think they'll need a solid defence and someone good to cut in from the left to counter the strong right defenders. Here wig go here wig go here wig go. Edited by Mapletree (05 Dec 2016 3.35pm) A little levity not amiss
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
tome Inner Tantalus Time. 06 Dec 16 10.22am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by matt_himself
It is different, Jamie. The Lib Dems have always had a preoccupation with democracy. They have always extolled the virtues of a change to the democratic process in the UK and campaigned for the change side when the STV referendum happened a few years ago. What they are doing now is cynically seeking to get the Remain vote by saying they will ignore democracy and vote against leaving the EU. It's hypocrisy at its highest level. It will contribute to wiping out Labour at the next election. I would normally welcome that but under these circumstances, no. Why is it different? If Farage said he'd push for another if it was a 52-48 split, why can't others? In any case, the vote was for a departure, not a destination. Why do you think it's such a bad idea to check on the terms of that exit? Because people may assume the vote was about anti-establishment action, immigration, or strange fears of Turks or being part ofa super-state doesn't hold any water because that wasn't on the ballot. Given that the campaign was run on the back of preposterous lies don't you think that subverts democracy? F*ckin' hell the left v right tribalism 'we won, you lost, ner ner ner' is bloody tiresome.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 06 Dec 16 10.44am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by tome
Why is it different? If Farage said he'd push for another if it was a 52-48 split, why can't others? In any case, the vote was for a departure, not a destination. Why do you think it's such a bad idea to check on the terms of that exit? Because people may assume the vote was about anti-establishment action, immigration, or strange fears of Turks or being part ofa super-state doesn't hold any water because that wasn't on the ballot. Given that the campaign was run on the back of preposterous lies don't you think that subverts democracy? F*ckin' hell the left v right tribalism 'we won, you lost, ner ner ner' is bloody tiresome. Basically the previous gent is ranting against the Libdems being politicians
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 06 Dec 16 11.01am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by tome
Why is it different? If Farage said he'd push for another if it was a 52-48 split, why can't others? In any case, the vote was for a departure, not a destination. Why do you think it's such a bad idea to check on the terms of that exit? Because people may assume the vote was about anti-establishment action, immigration, or strange fears of Turks or being part ofa super-state doesn't hold any water because that wasn't on the ballot. Given that the campaign was run on the back of preposterous lies don't you think that subverts democracy? F*ckin' hell the left v right tribalism 'we won, you lost, ner ner ner' is bloody tiresome. Hold on a minute.... the original referendum in 1975 which resulted in us joining what was the common market was accepted in good grace by those who lost the vote! Since then the previously innocuous common market has become the EU federal state. If anything has been achieved by "preposterous lies" then surely that is what has happened to the UK with our enforced membership of the EU. No one in 1975 envisaged 300,000+ EU citizens arriving in the UK each and every year causing such hardship to communities with ghettos, lack of housing, schools, hospitals, etc. As you said the ballot paper was self explanatory.... you voted to remain or leave. Leave won this time, so just like in 1975, the losers should suck it up and accept that democracy has determined our departure from the EU. No legal challenge, no 2nd referendum to ratify terms, no Parliamentary debate. Brexit means Brexit now is just the same as our joining the common market in 1975 followed the people's voting decision. I was disappointed in 1975, but I accepted it. Please have the courtesy and respect to accept the country's decision now.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 06 Dec 16 11.05am | |
---|---|
Nawty, Hoofy. You said a while back you had no idea which way you voted in 1975. Get back down of that moral high ground and in the gutter with the rest of us.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 06 Dec 16 11.27am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Nawty, Hoofy. You said a while back you had no idea which way you voted in 1975. Get back down of that moral high ground and in the gutter with the rest of us. I did say that I wasn't sure a while back, but having given it more thought and chatting with the family I am now convinced that I voted no because.... 1, In those days whoever I voted for got beat. I am 99.9% sure I voted no.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 06 Dec 16 11.27am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
I did say that I wasn't sure a while back, but having given it more thought and chatting with the family I am now convinced that I voted no because.... 1, In those days whoever I voted for got beat. I am 99.9% sure I voted no. Bollocks Nice try, though.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 06 Dec 16 11.28am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by tome
Why is it different? If Farage said he'd push for another if it was a 52-48 split, why can't others? In any case, the vote was for a departure, not a destination. Why do you think it's such a bad idea to check on the terms of that exit? Because people may assume the vote was about anti-establishment action, immigration, or strange fears of Turks or being part ofa super-state doesn't hold any water because that wasn't on the ballot. Given that the campaign was run on the back of preposterous lies don't you think that subverts democracy? F*ckin' hell the left v right tribalism 'we won, you lost, ner ner ner' is bloody tiresome. Because the Lib Dems, hence part of their name, have always banged on about accepting democracy. By saying they will ignore the result of the referendum because it doesn't suit them, has a big whiff of hypocrisy hanging over it.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hoof Hearted 06 Dec 16 11.34am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Bollocks Nice try, though. That's why I like debating with you - your memory is good and you're fair usually and will accept a point well made in my experience. And you add a little humour to the debate. I miss Seth.... locking horns with him was a noble fight!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.