I wasn't being specific enough about the point I was really getting at.
Starmer in the past week was mumbling something about Covid restrictions being lifted too early and that things like mass-gatherings (football matches, tennis) should not be allowed
It'll be mildly interesting to see if the TV cameras pick him up in the stands of packed celebrities

I disengage, I turn the page.

After recent by election,claimed Liebour were back,having narrowly scraped home by a few hundred votes.A huge liebour majority wiped out,given that vote took place days after wa#ker Hancock's indiscretions.
Sir Quiere is a dead man walking and he is the only one who cannot see the hopelessness of his laughable leadership.

While Corbyn never held back and was essentially always in activist mode (which was itself a problem) I feel like Starmer goes too far in the other direction for the most part, and too circumspect and a pretty much a political non entity. He may well be a decent guy, but that doesn't really cut it in modern politics. That said I'm not entirely sure who they could replace him. Andy Burnham perhaps at least does appear to have wider appeal.

Ernie Bevin would do a better job even though he has been dead for 70 years.

If boris can do it, ANYONE can!

Sir Keir is just playing a waiting game.

Waiting for anything that resembles a policy.