This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 Mar 24 10.26am | |
---|---|
No-one is hounding Laxley-Lennon. He is his own worst enemy and knows exactly what he is doing. He invites being arrested in order to secure the publicity and the sympathy of those on the right who defend him. Anyone who believes otherwise is either extremely gullible or as guilty as he is of spreading misinformation. [Tweet Link]
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 11 Mar 24 10.39am | |
---|---|
The 'one-nation conservative' who posts far left 'Hope Not Hate' messages about Tommy Robinson. What I posted was accurate....they on the other hand supported and thus helped create a political situation where tens of thousands of vulnerable girls have been raped over decades. This particular poster defending the Police's initial responses to those rapes all while claiming he had heard about what was going on twenty years ago. I'll also add that Robinson being banned from London is ridiculous in a city where protests against ethnicities and knifing happens daily. It is exactly the double standard that loses respect for the authorities there. I'm no particular Robinson fan but the time and focus upon this one particular individual reveals the prosecution reserved for the white working class who object. Edited by Stirlingsays (11 Mar 2024 10.44am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 11 Mar 24 10.53am | |
---|---|
An English guy banned from London. But we can't ban foreign extremists from the country. Makes a lot of sense.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 Mar 24 11.02am | |
---|---|
What I heard was more like 35 years ago and came from my own daughters. Exactly what was said then is somewhat hazy but appeared then to be an isolated local problem (this was in the Home Counties, not the north) which the Police were involved in. From memory they were adopting a softly softly approach as the best way to get inside of, and then on top of, a problem that wasn’t then fully understood. Any sympathy I have expressed for the Police has been because of the demands we make of them whilst failing to provide them with the resources needed to accomplish them. Not specifically for their approach on any particular issue, but more generally. I don’t think they can win. Throw heavy resources at something and in short order someone will be complaining that another vital issue is being ignored. Yaxley-Lennon has been banned from entering London as a consequence of past offences. If he does so then he must expect to be arrested. There is no defence for that because there is no justification for it. You can campaign to have the law changed and for no-one to be banned in any circumstances but whilst the law is as it is then it applies to Y-L as to everyone else. So what was posted is not accurate at all. Y-L broke an order. It matters not a jot whether he is right/left or anything else.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 11 Mar 24 11.12am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
An English guy banned from London. But we can't ban foreign extremists from the country. Makes a lot of sense. Of course. The British will be prevented from defending their own country against a real invasion. Any resistance is crushed at an early stage. The Russians should just land inflatables at Dungeness or apply for a place at one of our greedy universities. Who needs tanks and guns when the British government invites you in and then lets you dictate policy.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 11 Mar 24 11.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Of course. The British will be prevented from defending their own country against a real invasion. Any resistance is crushed at an early stage. The Russians should just land inflatables at Dungeness or apply for a place at one of our greedy universities. Who needs tanks and guns when the British government invites you in and then lets you dictate policy.
Any person on the right who joins the Police or the military at this point is just asleep at the wheel. These institutions are against them.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 Mar 24 11.37am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
An English guy banned from London. But we can't ban foreign extremists from the country. Makes a lot of sense. Yaxley-Lennon could easily have avoided being excluded by just staying within the law. Just as everyone else is expected to. Of course we can, and do, refuse entry to anyone suspected of being an extremist who requires to obtain a visa to enter. Dealing with illegal entry is clearly a different issue.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 11 Mar 24 11.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
you ever heard the spiteful violent intolerance being preached at Speakers Corner ? oh, and by the way, did the cops ever catch the islamist who stabbed the Christian lady there ?
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 11 Mar 24 11.52am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Yaxley-Lennon could easily have avoided being excluded by just staying within the law. Just as everyone else is expected to. Of course we can, and do, refuse entry to anyone suspected of being an extremist who requires to obtain a visa to enter. Dealing with illegal entry is clearly a different issue. Why is there a constant requirement to call him by his 'real" name? It doesn't apply to thousands of people from Nelson Mandela to Stan Laurel from Wilf Zaha to John Le Carre.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 11 Mar 24 12.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
What I heard was more like 35 years ago and came from my own daughters. Exactly what was said then is somewhat hazy but appeared then to be an isolated local problem (this was in the Home Counties, not the north) which the Police were involved in. From memory they were adopting a softly softly approach as the best way to get inside of, and then on top of, a problem that wasn’t then fully understood. Any sympathy I have expressed for the Police has been because of the demands we make of them whilst failing to provide them with the resources needed to accomplish them. Not specifically for their approach on any particular issue, but more generally. I don’t think they can win. Throw heavy resources at something and in short order someone will be complaining that another vital issue is being ignored. Yaxley-Lennon has been banned from entering London as a consequence of past offences. If he does so then he must expect to be arrested. There is no defence for that because there is no justification for it. You can campaign to have the law changed and for no-one to be banned in any circumstances but whilst the law is as it is then it applies to Y-L as to everyone else. So what was posted is not accurate at all. Y-L broke an order. It matters not a jot whether he is right/left or anything else. Do you consider the arrest of this individual, whatever you want to call him, to be of more importance than the very issue which has bought him to notoriety?
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 11 Mar 24 12.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
Do you consider the arrest of this individual, whatever you want to call him, to be of more importance than the very issue which has bought him to notoriety? Maybe if they keep arresting Tommy Robinson, then Muslims will stop the grooming and the terror attacks?
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 Mar 24 12.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Why is there a constant requirement to call him by his 'real" name? It doesn't apply to thousands of people from Nelson Mandela to Stan Laurel from Wilf Zaha to John Le Carre. Because of whose name he chose and the desire to be called that rather than by his rather posh sounding name. It’s a totally different name. People who use stage names do so for good, often legal, reasons. Nelson Mandela had a middle name. So do I, but I don’t usually use it. He also had a tribal respect name. That’s cultural. Wilf chose to use only his second name. So did my brother, to avoid confusion with our Dad. Maybe that’s his reason too.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.