This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
jamiemartin721 Reading 21 Apr 17 2.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Because an economy that has a surplus from exploitation or indeed by any other means has far more money to spend on its social programmes. I would have thought that was obvious. Indeed, but the question really is why isn't it, because those who benefit from the system, find that exploitation is beneficial to them - and its easier to exploit people if they're dependent on you, and in fear of their livehoods and economic stability. The problems of morality, is that people are not moral, part of the role of state has to be to regulate and control, in order to limit the extent of exploitation, and ensure the well being of all of its people - not just those who they identify with. The problem with capitalism is the same as with socialism, you can't rely on people to make the moral decision to 'do right' over their own self benefit and interest. That has to be what the state is there for.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
davenotamonkey 21 Apr 17 2.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
What does that mean? I think you mean Labour there. Coming in for nearly a century of Labour dominance in the north, and look at the state of it. Labour need and thrive on a poverty-bound electorate - how else will they sell their fabled socialist utopia. Perhaps with promotional videos from their comrades in Venezuela?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 21 Apr 17 2.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
I think you mean Labour there. Coming in for nearly a century of Labour dominance in the north, and look at the state of it. Labour need and thrive on a poverty-bound electorate - how else will they sell their fabled socialist utopia. Perhaps with promotional videos from their comrades in Venezuela? Exactly. And now that have ethnic minorities to pander to as well. Labour have a similar problem to UKIP. Now that a definition of poor is having a TV of less than 50 inches, who is poor enough to vote for the sorry bunch of hypocrites. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (21 Apr 2017 2.53pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CambridgeEagle Sydenham 21 Apr 17 2.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
So that would be a "no" then. All doom and gloom in your little echo chamber. Can't wait to see you proven wrong. Brexit is, and will be, the best thing that has happened to this country in decades. But do carry on howling at the moon.
I was merely pointing out that the IMF stats you were trying to use had big caveats which you'd ignored. I was also pointing out that foreigners buying UK property is not inward investment.
I'd be genuinely interested to read some credible source to back up your claims.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CambridgeEagle Sydenham 21 Apr 17 2.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
I think you mean Labour there. Coming in for nearly a century of Labour dominance in the north, and look at the state of it. Labour need and thrive on a poverty-bound electorate - how else will they sell their fabled socialist utopia. Perhaps with promotional videos from their comrades in Venezuela?
It's not like in the North they had an option to avoid austerity and the Labour party in the North decided against it. I'd love to see some actual evidence to support something you say one day!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 21 Apr 17 3.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Nick knows that all to well but he has Jeremy Corbyn's likeness tattooed on his arse. That's funny cos Nigel Farage has your arse tattooed on his face.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 21 Apr 17 3.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Indeed, but the question really is why isn't it, because those who benefit from the system, find that exploitation is beneficial to them - and its easier to exploit people if they're dependent on you, and in fear of their livehoods and economic stability. The problems of morality, is that people are not moral, part of the role of state has to be to regulate and control, in order to limit the extent of exploitation, and ensure the well being of all of its people - not just those who they identify with. The problem with capitalism is the same as with socialism, you can't rely on people to make the moral decision to 'do right' over their own self benefit and interest. That has to be what the state is there for. Edited by jamiemartin721 (21 Apr 2017 2.49pm) Did the states where most power was held by the state, eg: USSR, China, Cuba, Easter Europe, North Korea, Iraq etc, 'do right' by their people? Edited by hedgehog50 (21 Apr 2017 3.07pm)
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 21 Apr 17 3.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Did the states where most power was held by the state, eg: USSR, China, Cuba, Easter Europe, North Korea 'do right' by their people? Do you seriously think Corbyn is aiming to make the U.K like any of these?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 21 Apr 17 3.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Do you seriously think Corbyn is aiming to make the U.K like any of these? I don't think he's honestly expecting to get much influence on the future of the UK at all.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
hedgehog50 Croydon 21 Apr 17 3.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Do you seriously think Corbyn is aiming to make the U.K like any of these? No, and I didn't say he was. I'm merely pointing out the tendency is that the more power a state has over its people, the more repressive it is - and socialism is all about state control.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 21 Apr 17 3.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Part Time James
I don't think he's honestly expecting to get much influence on the future of the UK at all. Touche. But seriously I've seen tweets etc that say something on the lines of Corbyn will turn us into Soviet Russia.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Part Time James 21 Apr 17 3.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Touche. But seriously I've seen tweets etc that say something on the lines of Corbyn will turn us into Soviet Russia. All I hope is that Twitter and Facebook don't reflect the intelligence levels of my fellow human beings.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.