This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
I'm hearing that, as I had feared on these very pages, that Gonzalo Lira has been confirmed dead in Ukraine according to his father. Looks like I was right to raise those concerns and now he's dead. If this is true this needs answers. This case was specifically raised with the Biden administration who fobbed off concerns.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
The crook has just fleeced the UK of 2.5 billion quid. Everyone's taxes going into his back pocket.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
The crook has just fleeced the UK of 2.5 billion quid. Everyone's taxes going into his back pocket. I know, it's beyond a joke. Highly taxed, borrowing high, huge debts and you can't drive down the road for potholes in this country or get a GP appointment but we have billions to throw away for Ukraine for a war they can't win. This country just loves to spend money....low quality elites.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
The crook has just fleeced the UK of 2.5 billion quid. Everyone's taxes going into his back pocket. Apart from he didn't... 1. £2.5 billion is the amount projected for the next financial year, its not a lump sum. I doubt most of it is even allocated as of yet. 2. If you think we are packing up money and putting in a van then there is little helping you. Most of this money actually stays in the UK where it helps creates jobs. For example £200 million on drone manufacturing.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
I suspect the result of the Iowa caucus has just sealed the fate of Ukraine. Trump has talked about a meeting with Putin early into his tenure. There, no doubt, he will extract an undertaking that Russia can take Ukraine and retain effective control of Belarus through vassal status but will proceed no further. Trump will then return to the US where he will triumphantly hold up a piece of paper and declare peace in our time. Putin will wait till Trump's (no doubt) turbulent tenure is finally over, consolidate his power over those 4 years, and then advance into the Balkans, Moldova etc. But of utmost importance, there will be considerable fiscal savings, fuel supply will resume, world inflation will drop, house prices will rise and Israel will continue to be generously funded.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
I suspect the result of the Iowa caucus has just sealed the fate of Ukraine. Trump has talked about a meeting with Putin early into his tenure. There, no doubt, he will extract an undertaking that Russia can take Ukraine and retain effective control of Belarus through vassal status but will proceed no further. Trump will then return to the US where he will triumphantly hold up a piece of paper and declare peace in our time. Putin will wait till Trump's (no doubt) turbulent tenure is finally over, consolidate his power over those 4 years, and then advance into the Balkans, Moldova etc. But of utmost importance, there will be considerable fiscal savings, fuel supply will resume, world inflation will drop, house prices will rise and Israel will continue to be generously funded. I'm pretty sure that won't happen.....and the main reason for that is Poland, which just wouldn't accept Russia on its border and the security agreements Ukraine has with us and soon France and others. While Trump will draw back from Nato he won't abandon it for several reasons. Here is what I think happens.....the eventual agreement (whether Trump wins or not) sees Russia take its four regions and maybe Odessa. Enabling this in Ukraine will probably be done via the election of a candidate who promises peace with Russia. I very much suspect that this is what happens....there might even be a level of internal conflict in Ukraine similar to how the Irish had their own internal war before settling with the British in 1917. If Russia has other territory, other than the areas it identified it'll negotiate it away for a neutral Ukraine that isn't allowed to join Nato and hence not to be militarised against it. How much of that they get remains to be seen. As for the further expansion by Russia into eastern European states that have sided against it. This isn't knowable and no doubt Europe can flood these countries with weapons like they did Ukraine. Personally I don't see Russia staying within regions that don't have Russian friendly populations already there. The idea that Putin will be Stalin and take back the old empire goes directly against what he has said since the nineties. He has criticised the Soviet empire many times. However, states that are willing to be 'Ukraines' aren't being particularly sensible. I said at the start that this course of action was insane and I have no pleasure in these outcomes. Hundreds of thousands dead in the most avoidable war I've ever seen. The decisions to essentially jump to neo con policy in the US state department has been a terrible decision by Europe. I predict my opinion will slowly become recognised across Europe.....mainly because defence budgets will rise and welfare will have to be cut for that to happen. The policy of not supporting the confrontational agenda of the US is prominent in several rising parties in Europe. Farage supported it and so do the Afd in Germany, who are leading the polls. The policy put Russia into China's arms, led to a global split in the world with a new cold war with now several flash points for WW3.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Mike Benz (who it shouldn't be forgotten was in the state department) on US and EU policy and attitudes towards Ukraine in this west v east policy. [Tweet Link]
Edited by Stirlingsays (17 Jan 2024 10.38am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
What is and has been anathema to Russia throughout its history is an opposing force on its border. It has endured a long, bitter history to forge this position. The post WWII Eastern Bloc states surrounding the Soviet Union and providing a buffer zone against further invasion (whether perceived or real), is just the latest iteration of how Russia and USSR have sought to achieve that. The hybrid you envisage may be accepted by Putin as a stage 1, but he will not rest until Mother Russia is secure with vassal states or open seas on every border. What Poland accepts or does not accept is neither here not there. Russia will not be interested in its view. Trump will pretend to listen but ultimately sell them down the river in favour of diverting resources to US domestic policy, especially homeland security at the Rio Grande. US allies in Europe will be placated so long as they agree to pay their way in NATO. Since they won't, they will ultimately be left to wring their hands in impotence. You may be correct in terms of Russia's further ambitions. And that Putin is not Stalin. Uncle Joe had reached the Elbe and apparently addressed his generals. We have 400 divisions in the field (c4million men at arms) why should we not continue to the Azores? The Bomb apparently persuaded him not to or at least to put that ambition on ice. Putin harks back not to that world domination by the proletariat, but to Tsarist Russia and the need to protect the Motherland through border expansion. Finland may be considered a safe border but there have been centuries of conflict. However, the Baltic states continue to have a lot of Russian speakers and have morphed into and out of Russian control over history. They are under genuine threat. But they are also NATO members with US airbases. For this reason, I think this risk is hyperbole used by the West to drum up support for supporting Ukraine. Putin has seen how effective his army is against his undernourished neighbour with relatively limited Western support. He will know it will end very badly if he attacks a NATO member and sees the dogs of war fully unleashed... I suspect he will settle for a pet Ukraine and some medium term stability will be restored.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
What is and has been anathema to Russia throughout its history is an opposing force on its border. It has endured a long, bitter history to forge this position. The post WWII Eastern Bloc states surrounding the Soviet Union and providing a buffer zone against further invasion (whether perceived or real), is just the latest iteration of how Russia and USSR have sought to achieve that. The hybrid you envisage may be accepted by Putin as a stage 1, but he will not rest until Mother Russia is secure with vassal states or open seas on every border. What Poland accepts or does not accept is neither here not there. Russia will not be interested in its view. Trump will pretend to listen but ultimately sell them down the river in favour of diverting resources to US domestic policy, especially homeland security at the Rio Grande. US allies in Europe will be placated so long as they agree to pay their way in NATO. Since they won't, they will ultimately be left to wring their hands in impotence. You may be correct in terms of Russia's further ambitions. And that Putin is not Stalin. Uncle Joe had reached the Elbe and apparently addressed his generals. We have 400 divisions in the field (c4million men at arms) why should we not continue to the Azores? The Bomb apparently persuaded him not to or at least to put that ambition on ice. Putin harks back not to that world domination by the proletariat, but to Tsarist Russia and the need to protect the Motherland through border expansion. Finland may be considered a safe border but there have been centuries of conflict. However, the Baltic states continue to have a lot of Russian speakers and have morphed into and out of Russian control over history. They are under genuine threat. But they are also NATO members with US airbases. For this reason, I think this risk is hyperbole used by the West to drum up support for supporting Ukraine. Putin has seen how effective his army is against his undernourished neighbour with relatively limited Western support. He will know it will end very badly if he attacks a NATO member and sees the dogs of war fully unleashed... I suspect he will settle for a pet Ukraine and some medium term stability will be restored. Interesting and intelligent analysis. How much comes to past I suppose we all will get to see. I find it all quite depressing and saddening. I think Russia's and Europe's attitude towards each other is quite similar. I have more sympathy for the fear of eastern block countries if I'm honest rather than us due to the soviet history....However, these aren't socially liberal countries either and these countries...much as Ukraine was, become internally discordant over their futures. Personally I hope for a meeting of the practical and pragmatic over what currently holds court.....otherwise it's all going to get rather more expensive.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
The post script I omitted is that we may be seen to be right to support Ukraine, even though the outcome seems likely to end with what Putin wants. Simply put, while Putin shares Stalin's disregard for the lives of his own troops, he has seen that it is politically and financially too costly to prosecute an offensive campaign on his western borders. Edited by silvertop (17 Jan 2024 1.01pm)
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
The post script I omitted is that we may be seen to be right to support Ukraine, even though the outcome seems likely to end with what Putin wants. Simply put, while Putin shares Stalin's disregard for the lives of his own troops, he has seen that it is politically and financially too costly to prosecute an offensive campaign on his western borders. Edited by silvertop (17 Jan 2024 1.01pm) Policy that led up to 2014 is why we are in this situation in the first place. In terms of supporting Ukraine, we would probably disagree on the nature of that support as being good for either Ukraine or our future. I'm far more in agreement with Orban's analysis on that point and I'm also of the mind that this viewpoint will ultimately prevail due to necessity if nothing else. The stomach for the high spending necessary to maintain a military confrontation stance with Russia will end with the weakening of social liberalism in Europe due to economic decline.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
The post script I omitted is that we may be seen to be right to support Ukraine, even though the outcome seems likely to end with what Putin wants. Simply put, while Putin shares Stalin's disregard for the lives of his own troops, he has seen that it is politically and financially too costly to prosecute an offensive campaign on his western borders. Edited by silvertop (17 Jan 2024 1.01pm) Surely that was the point of NATO providing the support it has, and applying the sanctions? If he had been able to walk all over Ukraine with little resistance and his army largely intact who knows where the line would then be drawn or what the future would hold. Especially with the threat of a second Trump presidency lurking in people’s minds?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.