This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Matov 22 Jul 20 2.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Okay but that is just your opinion based on what? Corbyn supporters will say that so maybe that is where the noise is coming from.
Thats a valid question. The only answer I can give you is that by the response from the parties involved, it 'stinks'. Only way to describe it. If you are sad enough to follow this stuff closely you get a feel for it. Bloody daft when I write it down like this and feel free to mock but this goes beyond the usual games. From various accounts I follow and the like, this is not the usual BS. This f***ed up. It really is. I openly admit to a real paranoia about Starmer. I see him as far more sinister that Corbyn ever was, absolutely convinced he was a leading party in deliberately engineering Labours defeat in December. And now throwing in the towel on a court case the party he is leading stood a very good chance of winning, going by what is being said? If Starmer is Labours solution then so far he has cost them an election and now gives in on court cases they can win. Something ain't right.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 22 Jul 20 4.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
Thats a valid question. The only answer I can give you is that by the response from the parties involved, it 'stinks'. Only way to describe it. If you are sad enough to follow this stuff closely you get a feel for it. Bloody daft when I write it down like this and feel free to mock but this goes beyond the usual games. From various accounts I follow and the like, this is not the usual BS. This f***ed up. It really is. I openly admit to a real paranoia about Starmer. I see him as far more sinister that Corbyn ever was, absolutely convinced he was a leading party in deliberately engineering Labours defeat in December. And now throwing in the towel on a court case the party he is leading stood a very good chance of winning, going by what is being said? If Starmer is Labours solution then so far he has cost them an election and now gives in on court cases they can win. Something ain't right. I think you have a point about Starmer wanting Corbyn to fail he wasn't the only one. But with regards to the court case some pretty nasty things were said about the whistleblowers which was completely unprofessional. Labour may have won it's case but it would have been a Anyway we shall see no doubt more stuff will leak out.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eagleman13 On The Road To Hell & Alicante 22 Jul 20 4.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I think you have a point about Starmer wanting Corbyn to fail he wasn't the only one. But with regards to the court case some pretty nasty things were said about the whistleblowers which was completely unprofessional. Labour may have won it's case but it would have been a Anyway we shall see no doubt more stuff will leak out. Not with the Biased Bullshyte Co you wont, they will suppress it, hide it, accidently fail to report it. They will continue their rhetoric & demand 'everyone' pays for their huge obscene wages so they can *ahem* entertain, inform & educate the population to their wants.
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 22 Jul 20 4.52pm | |
---|---|
Hopefully this will not be the end of matters with labour MPs without an anti-semitic bone in their bodies careers and reputations damaged. Starmer is a nasty piece of work.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 22 Jul 20 4.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by eagleman13
Not with the Biased Bullshyte Co you wont, they will suppress it, hide it, accidently fail to report it. They will continue their rhetoric & demand 'everyone' pays for their huge obscene wages so they can *ahem* entertain, inform & educate the population to their wants. When you earn £190,000 pa of course it's good value for money.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 22 Jul 20 8.45pm | |
---|---|
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 22 Jul 20 9.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
Great choice we have, the Prince Regent or Uriah Heap.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 22 Jul 20 10.34pm | |
---|---|
And whilst I don't mean this as a personal slur, how many of the Left cheered Starmer on when he pushed for this second referendum? It was utter insanity on any kind of reasoned or rational understanding of British electoral politics. A complete no-go given how England and Wales were staunchly behind voting Leave. An absolute guaranteed way of ensuring that Labour lost and lost badly. Yet many of you cheered it on. Wanted nothing more than the biggest electoral exercise in British history cast aside and were willing to blindly follow behind despite the glaring evidence of just how stupid the position was. Now I can accept that I voted for that utter moron Johnson solely on the Brexit issue but for the life of me, I cannot truly fathom why so many people fell for Starmers second referendum BS, especially when the evidence of it being utterly without hope of ever coming to fruition was in plain sight. Leaving us with this. They say we get the politicians we deserve and never has that been so true.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 23 Jul 20 9.12am | |
---|---|
Response from the BBC journalist to the idea that Labour had a good case and it was a political decision by Starmer to surrender. Corbyn supporters will disagree of course but it goes to my argument that this case was about how people within the Labour party libelled these 7 individuals rather than is the Labour party anti-Semitic.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 23 Jul 20 9.37am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Response from the BBC journalist to the idea that Labour had a good case and it was a political decision by Starmer to surrender. Corbyn supporters will disagree of course but it goes to my argument that this case was about how people within the Labour party libelled these 7 individuals rather than is the Labour party anti-Semitic. The BBC is in play now. Defunding it could well be a major manfiesto pledge in 2024 from the Tory side. Starmer is its only real hope of maintaining the status quo. Hence why it will now go to bat fully on Starmers side. Labour could have won that case. That is the point. It utterly capitulated because it wanted to lose. It wants the guilt by way of tainting the left. I am no Corbyn supporter. His brand, and support, from the left are the very anthisis of what I believe and stand for but Starmer represents a much wider and deeper threat. Corbyn, for all his many faults, is a man I believe genuinely values democracy. Believes in the notion of one man, one vote. Where as Starmer patently does not. Only in power. And was willing to sacrfice is own party to achieve that. A man who cannot be trusted, who has not principles and no wider loyaltys other than to himself. A
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 23 Jul 20 9.46am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
The BBC is in play now. Defunding it could well be a major manfiesto pledge in 2024 from the Tory side. Starmer is its only real hope of maintaining the status quo. Hence why it will now go to bat fully on Starmers side. Labour could have won that case. That is the point. It utterly capitulated because it wanted to lose. It wants the guilt by way of tainting the left. I am no Corbyn supporter. His brand, and support, from the left are the very anthisis of what I believe and stand for but Starmer represents a much wider and deeper threat. Corbyn, for all his many faults, is a man I believe genuinely values democracy. Believes in the notion of one man, one vote. Where as Starmer patently does not. Only in power. And was willing to sacrfice is own party to achieve that. A man who cannot be trusted, who has not principles and no wider loyaltys other than to himself. A I enjoy your posts Matov. I hadn't thought about the BBC angle it wouldn't surprise me the BBC needs all the allies it can get.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 23 Jul 20 1.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
...the BBC needs all the allies it can get. It is s*** or bust time for it. Its funding model is simply no longer justifiable and as for the salaries it pays people, then beyond belief really. There is probably a role for it still at the upper end of the market but that could be funded by subscriptions, adverts and some limited Government funding for some of its news and current affairs output. But in terms of competing with the major commerical channels for mass audiences, then its time has come and gone. When people had limited options in terms of what they could watch it could be justified and even when it at least adhered to the basic principles of fairness, then fine but now? After Brexit and its disgraceful coverage of it all? No. Dead in the water. And a manifesto goal for the Tories. Has to be. Will force Labour into a kind of Brexit quandry again. Membership will be vehmently in support of keeping the licence fee, the votes it needs to challenge the Tories amongst people who would happily see the back of the liceence fee for ever.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.