This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
BlueJay UK 19 Jan 21 9.01pm | |
---|---|
Trump promoted N.M. official’s comment that ‘the only good Democrat is a dead Democrat.’ Now the man is arrested in the Capitol riot - https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/18/trump-promoted-his-comment-that-only-good-democrat-is-dead-democrat-now-he-is-arrested-storming-capitol/
Now a man with a personal connection to Trump — and whose violent rhetoric Trump promoted to the world — has been arrested in the riot. Otero County, N.M., Commissioner Couy Griffin was arrested Sunday for illegally entering the Capitol on Jan. 6. Griffin, the head of a group called Cowboys for Trump, claims he got caught up with the crowd and didn’t actually enter the building, but the affidavit says video on his personal Facebook page showed him in restricted areas. Griffin also pledged to return to Washington with guns for President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration Wednesday, and he alluded to the prospect of violence and another incursion into the offices of lawmakers. According to the affidavit, he said in a video posted after the Jan. 6 riot: … We could have a 2nd Amendment rally on those same steps that we had that rally yesterday. You know, and if we do, then it’s gonna be a sad day, because there’s gonna be blood running out of that building. But at the end of the day, you mark my word, we will plant our flag on the desk of Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and Donald J. Trump if it boils down to it. It’s not the first time Griffin has employed such violent rhetoric. He did so in May as well. And at the time, his message was promoted by Trump on Twitter. In the video, Griffin said, “The only good Democrat is a dead Democrat.” He qualified in the video that he was only speaking metaphorically about politics. Trump promoted the video by saying, “Thank you Cowboys. See you in New Mexico!” Anyone unable to appreciate Trump's role in this exists on a narrow scale between delusional and disingenuous. Cue whataboutisms.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 19 Jan 21 9.07pm | |
---|---|
'Traitors Get Shot': Capitol Rioter Accused of Threatening Children if They Turned Him In - [Link] "A member of a right-wing militia group who is accused of taking part in the attack on the Capitol allegedly threatened to shoot his children if they turned him in to authorities. Guy Reffitt, of Wylie, Texas, is accused of obstruction of justice and unlawful entry in connection with the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6. According to an affidavit signed by FBI special agent Thomas Ryan, Reffitt was seen at the Capitol building in Washington, D.C. washing eyes out with water after allegedly being hit with pepper spray while in the restricted area during the riot.
According to the affidavit, the son told authorities that Reffitt admitted to being in Washington on January 6 having "stormed the Capitol." On January 11, Reffitt told the family that he had to delete his Go Pro footage that he filmed on the day of the attack as the FBI were now watching him. The son said that Reffitt told him that if he went to the police that his father would have no option but to "do what he had to do" for the country. When the son asked if this was a threat, Reffitt replied, "Don't put words in my mouth." The son told the FBI he took Reffitt's comments to be a threat to his life. Reffitt is alleged to have told his minor daughter that if she used her phone to tell her friends that he was at the Capitol he would "put a bullet" through it. Reffitt's wife also told authorities that on January 11, her two children said Reffitt threatened them with words to the effect of: "If you turn me in, you're a traitor and you know what happens to traitors...traitors get shot." The wife said Reffitt told her he was "trying to protect the family, and if someone was a traitor then that's what's going to happen." Edited by BlueJay (19 Jan 2021 9.08pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 19 Jan 21 10.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
So if someone is "white" and in their early 20s it follows that they must be a middle class "rent a mob" type? I don't doubt that many were activists who passionately care about issues but if any either looted or caused damage then they weren't. They were criminals using genuine protests as cover. Decent law-abiding citizens, who believe in democracy, will protest about injustice when it was as awful as that which happened to Floyd. They aren't though criminals. Law-abiding citizens don't break the law. The fact that you don't see much support on the street in NY ought not be a surprise. It seems he isn't very popular there. I wonder why?
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
AuntyAnne70 Tunbridge WElls 19 Jan 21 10.29pm | |
---|---|
But not quite as corrupt as Trump or half the MP's though.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 19 Jan 21 10.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I suppose your interpretation of what "infiltration" means in these circumstances isn't mine. For me it implies a deliberate attempt by an opposing viewpoint to insert an activist. Not human failure. I just think it’s interesting that you’re willing to ascribe some people’s failings to “infiltration” whilst regarding other’s as human error.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Jan 21 10.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
As stated before, all this is time measurable. We will see what happens in the GOP and what it looks like in two years time. Is that a promise? You will wait for a full two years before posting any more illogical claims? That would be a very welcome, if unlikely, development. I won't be holding my breath but miracles do sometimes happen.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matthau South Croydon 19 Jan 21 10.54pm | |
---|---|
No flag on the whitehouse tonight. Attachment: F3D5A298-9767-4979-905A-45F5B30A9CF1.png (2,207.88Kb)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matthau South Croydon 19 Jan 21 10.55pm | |
---|---|
. Attachment: 65025240-17AE-4CAE-A8BA-2756967FA460.png (2,569.26Kb)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Jan 21 11.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Ok wimp. Ok sophomaniac.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Jan 21 11.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Democracy has a habit of working like that! Compared to Trump, Khan is a paragon.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 Jan 21 11.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
I just think it’s interesting that you’re willing to ascribe some people’s failings to “infiltration” whilst regarding other’s as human error. As I don't it isn't interesting at all. Where on earth do you get that idea from? The people who might have infiltrated protests wouldn't have done so as a consequence of failure. If it happened it would have been a deliberate act. Any Judge failing to meet the high standards required of them is very unlikely to have infiltrated. They have to work their way up the profession over many years and if they repeatedly fail then they will likely be thrown out.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 19 Jan 21 11.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
As I don't it isn't interesting at all. Where on earth do you get that idea from? The people who might have infiltrated protests wouldn't have done so as a consequence of failure. If it happened it would have been a deliberate act. Any Judge failing to meet the high standards required of them is very unlikely to have infiltrated. They have to work their way up the profession over many years and if they repeatedly fail then they will likely be thrown out. The point is that you make statements of absolute fact based on your understanding of unimpeachable sources whilst everyone else believes conspiracy theories also my original point about judges was an attempt to highlight how many things can be attributed to infiltration not an allegation but by all means carry on bloviating.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.