Starbucks sacked that white manager who called the Police when two black men refused to buy anything but wouldn't leave Starbucks who were then arrested.

She has successfully sued them for 25 million dollars.

Mark Dice has a video on it and the growing racism against white people, which can also affect south east Asians.

[Link]

Edited by Stirlingsays (18 Jun 2023 7.51pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

It was his campaign that had the primary open connections. In particular General Michael Flynn. The Mueller investigation resulted in the indictment of Flynn, Paul Manafort and others. Several of the US intelligence agencies concluded that Russia was behind the leaking of Clinton's emails.

Trump wasn't found guilty because he was never charged! Barr ruled a sitting President couldn't be. Mueller was very specific with his language when making his report and inferred that not indicting him didn't mean he was innocent. This is why his papers are all now in New York, out of the reach of Federal authority.

How "active" the investigation is I don't know. I am not sure what else needs to be done. It's probably more a question of timing than detailed leg work. If Trump is jailed for a long time and fails to win the nomination it might prove unnecessary.

Claiming it was all a waste of public money is exactly what Trump wants you to think. I don't. I'm not fooled by him.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I will pick those apart one by one.

Those people were charged as a direct result of the investigation by Mueller into the alleged connections between the Trump campaign and Russia. People who were effectively bribed by Trump to keep their mouths shut. They were pardoned as was Roger Stone. Flynn pleaded guilty to lying about conversations he had with the Russian ambassador. Collusion wasn't proved. Neither was it disproved.

The intelligence services will apply just as much attention to perceived intelligence threats as is necessary. Credible information from their own sources that a major political campaign was colluding with a hostile foreign state would be taken very seriously, whoever it was.

Barr ruled a sitting President could not be indicted. Without any interpretations of his own on the circumstances. He effectively stymied the Mueller report before its publication.

The Durham report showed no such thing. It did not even comment on the outcome of the investigation. All it did was comment on some procedural issues which the FBI has accepted as recommendations for improvement. It acknowledged that the FBI needed to investigate but suggested they went for a full investigation, rather than a preliminary one he thought was required. Big deal! One man's opinion which was not shared by the original investigation by Horrowitz. It was a 4-year waste of time and money, established solely by Trump to try to whitewash Trump.

I have not read the Durham report itself. Only a variety of reports on the report. None of them suggest it says "that it was baseless and not credible" to investigate Trump. Perhaps you can reference where it does? I haven't read it, so let's see if you have, or if it's the bs I suspect it is.

[Link]

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

He might just like the new woke ‘equaliser’

Five year investigation? That tells you all you need to know. 'Here's five years to clean up your other affairs'. And then a slap on the wrist for being caught red handed several times.

Red and Blue Army!

I do yes. Others can make their own minds up. I suspect when it's relatives of powerful people, it often does. Prime Minister's sons, President's sons, billionaires etc. It happens all the time.

Red and Blue Army!