What dumbfounds and sickens me about the Joe and Hunter corruption allegations is that our beloved BBC refuses to give it any meaningful coverage. They constantly look the other way. This encapsulates why BBC news isn’t fit for purpose. Please stick to wildlife and comedy where it can be trusted.

The evidence against Joe and Hunter is quite staggering and the FBI and Department of Justice have been covering for their bribery and money laundering activities for years.

The banks have filed over 150 SARS (suspicious activity reports) against the Biden family for transfers of monies in excess of 15m to the Biden family from Ukraine, China and other jurisdictions. All these payments were made through multiple shell companies with the intention to hide them and mask an audit trail. What’s even more shocking is that there’s no underlying legitimate business rationale for the payments. Buying influence is what it’s all about.

The truth will out in due course as the net is now tightening. It will be interesting to see how the BBC finally responds and explain their silence and lack of reporting or even investigative curiosity. What they do publish is buried on page 14 etc…

It doesn’t go unnoticed how the BBC championed and obsessively covered the completely fabricated Trump/Russia probe. Headlines every day for months if not years. Their double standards are embarrassing.

Funny and very warped world we now live in.

Edited by NE14T (17 Jun 2023 10.57pm)

Edited by NE14T (17 Jun 2023 11.01pm)

Also, to add, how on earth did what I say amount to a conspiracy theory?....that's my opinion not a conspiracy theory.

I'm not conspiring to some illegal aim.

You fruitcakes get so enmeshed in your CNN speak that you don't know your arse from your elbow anymore....turning into Hol's Biden.....What next? Gonna say 'long live the Queen' and not know where the exit is?

Edited by Stirlingsays (17 Jun 2023 5.22pm)

He was picked to do a job. Which was to get rid of Trump. He did his job.

I remain convinced he won't actually be the candidate in 2024. I think he will withdraw late in the day, under some convenient cover. So who both the GOP and the Dems put up remains open and interesting.

He was picked to do a job. Which was to get rid of Trump. He did his job.

I remain convinced he won't actually be the candidate in 2024. I think he will withdraw late in the day, under some convenient cover. So who both the GOP and the Dems put up remains open and interesting.

I wonder if that's more or less than the deaths in Ukraine.

The Trump campaign's connection to Russia is an established fact. Russia's interference in the 2016 Presidential election, Brexit and other elections in the West via social media activity is also an established fact.

Mueller's investigation into Trump's connection to this didn't exonerate Trump, as he claimed. It was unable to prove it and he was stymied by Barr's ruling that a sitting President cannot be indicted.

So this is no conspiracy theory. It's an ongoing situation that has yet to reach a conclusion.

Trump wants to whitewash himself and rewrite history via the constant repetition of lies.

Those who assist him, as you regularly do, are frequently to be found in the USA. It's sad to see it here. We are better than that.