It's got nothing to do with Trump's objective; he's just a reality game show host who's accidentally got to be President and is running with it. He never believed he'd win!

The Simpsons predicted President Trump.

I was waiting for Adam West to become major....guess that's impossible now.

You are correct that they do not produce video content for every story they cover. But the video content they do produce portrays no negativity for the Democrats. That is false reporting, whether it's on the YouTube page, the website, their radio shows etc. It's the BBC and it's supposed to be impartial.

I am specifically referring to the BBC's YouTube channel which has 1.6 million subscribers around the world.

The story was buried, and you know for certain if it involved Trump, then it would have been the top story.

And the BBC pumps out fake news like this: Mike Pence ignores Nasa 'do not touch' sign [Link] I mean really??

Edited by Penge Eagle (27 Oct 2017 8.00pm)

"If you only use a selective source, or number of them, you'll get selective reporting." That is rubbish! If you select random stories, you select them even handedly.

I do use the BBC website and that too has anti-Trump and anti-Bexit bias. It's harder to argue on some days whether the order of importance of their stories on the homepage are justified. Certainly anti-Democrat stuff gets buried and anti-Trump stuff is pushed higher up the pecking order and it happens more often. But it's harder to monitor as the home page changes regularly throughout the day, unlike the YouTube page where it's obvious.

Living in the UK, I always felt that Obama was this fantastic president because we never really got any negative stories on him by MSM. Speaking to people in the US and doing my own research, I can see that it's a very different story. Again, how many negative storied on him can you find? MSM certainly has an agenda.

I like consuming video content and use YouTube every day for a variety of different subjects, music, news, entertainment. I find it easy to navigate and see short clips on what's happening and subscribe to many media outlets. If the BBC wants to promote its content through social media channels, then it must still adopt fair reporting. Forget the bias story selections, even its reporting on Trump is bad. Another reason why I mention its YouTube channel is because it's very easy to view the story choice at a glance and stories can't be hidden. I don't need to spend hours a week trawling their various TV and radio channels making notes on bias – its all their to see.

OK, let's agree on selective reporting here then. It's not their job to do that. They are supposed to have no political bias. I look forward to seeing your tally of anti-Dem stories!

And the Mike Pence story is simply a non story. It has been written in order to make Pence look stupid or ignorant and another example of MSM trying to undermine the Trump administration.

"If you only use a selective source, or number of them, you'll get selective reporting." That is rubbish! If you select random stories, you select them even handedly.

I do use the BBC website and that too has anti-Trump and anti-Bexit bias. It's harder to argue on some days whether the order of importance of their stories on the homepage are justified. Certainly anti-Democrat stuff gets buried and anti-Trump stuff is pushed higher up the pecking order and it happens more often. But it's harder to monitor as the home page changes regularly throughout the day, unlike the YouTube page where it's obvious.

Living in the UK, I always felt that Obama was this fantastic president because we never really got any negative stories on him by MSM. Speaking to people in the US and doing my own research, I can see that it's a very different story. Again, how many negative storied on him can you find? MSM certainly has an agenda.

I like consuming video content and use YouTube every day for a variety of different subjects, music, news, entertainment. I find it easy to navigate and see short clips on what's happening and subscribe to many media outlets. If the BBC wants to promote its content through social media channels, then it must still adopt fair reporting. Forget the bias story selections, even its reporting on Trump is bad. Another reason why I mention its YouTube channel is because it's very easy to view the story choice at a glance and stories can't be hidden. I don't need to spend hours a week trawling their various TV and radio channels making notes on bias – its all their to see.

OK, let's agree on selective reporting here then. It's not their job to do that. They are supposed to have no political bias. I look forward to seeing your tally of anti-Dem stories!

And the Mike Pence story is simply a non story. It has been written in order to make Pence look stupid or ignorant and another example of MSM trying to undermine the Trump administration.

I like to see opinions based on evidence. It's a sensible way of debating. You should try it!

Edited by Penge Eagle (30 Oct 2017 6.54pm)