BBC (again)

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 417 of 435 < 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 >

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Jun 24 9.13am
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger That makes it all the worse. If they were aware of his opinions, they knowingly employed that idiot. If they didn't know, they do now. Sack him. If every HR department asked the Daily Mail to do their kind of due diligence on candidates no one would ever get hired. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 16 Jun 24 9.13am

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

That makes it all the worse. If they were aware of his opinions, they knowingly employed that idiot.

If they didn't know, they do now. Sack him.

If every HR department asked the Daily Mail to do their kind of due diligence on candidates no one would ever get hired.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 16 Jun 24 5.21pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle If every HR department asked the Daily Mail to do their kind of due diligence on candidates no one would ever get hired. The BBC hired him, not the Daily Mail. They are responsible for employing a buffoon.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

16 Jun 24 5.21pm

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

If every HR department asked the Daily Mail to do their kind of due diligence on candidates no one would ever get hired.

The BBC hired him, not the Daily Mail. They are responsible for employing a buffoon.

Alert a moderator to this post

Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 16 Jun 24 5.31pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger The BBC hired him, not the Daily Mail. They are responsible for employing a buffoon. It makes you wonder who the buffoons really are. The simpletons raking it in, doing poor work for the BBC. Or those paying their TV licence fee without question. I disengage, I turn the page.
Alert a moderator to this post

Forest Hillbilly

in a hidey-hole 16 Jun 24 5.31pm

Send a Private Message to Forest Hillbilly

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

The BBC hired him, not the Daily Mail. They are responsible for employing a buffoon.

It makes you wonder who the buffoons really are. The simpletons raking it in, doing poor work for the BBC.
Or those paying their TV licence fee without question.

I disengage, I turn the page.

Alert a moderator to this post

eagleman13 On The Road To Hell & Alicante 16 Jun 24 5.46pm
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly It makes you wonder who the buffoons really are. The simpletons raking it in, doing poor work for the BBC. Or those paying their TV licence fee without question. I Cornwall by chance? Asking for, well proper people however you pigeonhole them. Hope all is well mate Edited by eagleman13 (16 Jun 2024 5.47pm) This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.
Alert a moderator to this post

eagleman13

On The Road To Hell & Alicante 16 Jun 24 5.46pm

Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly

It makes you wonder who the buffoons really are. The simpletons raking it in, doing poor work for the BBC.
Or those paying their TV licence fee without question.

I Cornwall by chance? Asking for, well proper people however you pigeonhole them. Hope all is well mate

Edited by eagleman13 (16 Jun 2024 5.47pm)

This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Jun 24 8.58pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger The BBC hired him, not the Daily Mail. They are responsible for employing a buffoon. It was the Daily Mail who wrote the story that others thought unimportant. Similar stories for other employers would receive no attention at all. This is 100% part of the Mail’s campaign to undermine confidence in the BBC. Why might they want to do that? For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 16 Jun 24 8.58pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

The BBC hired him, not the Daily Mail. They are responsible for employing a buffoon.

It was the Daily Mail who wrote the story that others thought unimportant. Similar stories for other employers would receive no attention at all.

This is 100% part of the Mail’s campaign to undermine confidence in the BBC. Why might they want to do that?

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

eagleman13 On The Road To Hell & Alicante 16 Jun 24 9.04pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle It was the Daily Mail who wrote the story that others thought unimportant. Similar stories for other employers would receive no attention at all. This is 100% part of the Mail’s campaign to undermine confidence in the BBC. Why might they want to do that? To represent the people who had had enough of the woke biased bbc. Is that OK for an honest answer? This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.
Alert a moderator to this post

eagleman13

On The Road To Hell & Alicante 16 Jun 24 9.04pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

It was the Daily Mail who wrote the story that others thought unimportant. Similar stories for other employers would receive no attention at all.

This is 100% part of the Mail’s campaign to undermine confidence in the BBC. Why might they want to do that?

To represent the people who had had enough of the woke biased bbc. Is that OK for an honest answer?

This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 16 Jun 24 9.13pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle It was the Daily Mail who wrote the story that others thought unimportant. Similar stories for other employers would receive no attention at all. This is 100% part of the Mail’s campaign to undermine confidence in the BBC. Why might they want to do that? So the Mail is the problem, not the complete idiot that they exposed? You need to stop. You have become obsessed with defending the indefensible.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

16 Jun 24 9.13pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

It was the Daily Mail who wrote the story that others thought unimportant. Similar stories for other employers would receive no attention at all.

This is 100% part of the Mail’s campaign to undermine confidence in the BBC. Why might they want to do that?

So the Mail is the problem, not the complete idiot that they exposed?

You need to stop. You have become obsessed with defending the indefensible.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Jun 24 10.14pm
Originally posted by eagleman13 To represent the people who had had enough of the woke biased bbc. Is that OK for an honest answer? No. Because it suits both the financial and political ambitions of its owners, along with appealing to the biases of its readers, who seem to think that there is something called “woke”! When we all know that is just an excuse to reject anything remotely progressive. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 16 Jun 24 10.14pm

Originally posted by eagleman13

To represent the people who had had enough of the woke biased bbc. Is that OK for an honest answer?

No. Because it suits both the financial and political ambitions of its owners, along with appealing to the biases of its readers, who seem to think that there is something called “woke”! When we all know that is just an excuse to reject anything remotely progressive.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Jun 24 10.18pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger So the Mail is the problem, not the complete idiot that they exposed? You need to stop. You have become obsessed with defending the indefensible. Yup, the Mail is a huge problem and has been for years. It’s a rag. A cess pit of misinformation dressed up as a newspaper. That it targets the middle classes doesn’t change that. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 16 Jun 24 10.18pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

So the Mail is the problem, not the complete idiot that they exposed?

You need to stop. You have become obsessed with defending the indefensible.

Yup, the Mail is a huge problem and has been for years.

It’s a rag. A cess pit of misinformation dressed up as a newspaper.

That it targets the middle classes doesn’t change that.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle 16 Jun 24 10.27pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Yup, the Mail is a huge problem and has been for years. It’s a rag. A cess pit of misinformation dressed up as a newspaper. That it targets the middle classes doesn’t change that. Exactly how many see the BBC then. One difference being that the Daily Mail can't charge £3 a week whether you read it or not.
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

16 Jun 24 10.27pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Yup, the Mail is a huge problem and has been for years.

It’s a rag. A cess pit of misinformation dressed up as a newspaper.

That it targets the middle classes doesn’t change that.

Exactly how many see the BBC then. One difference being that the Daily Mail can't charge £3 a week whether you read it or not.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 16 Jun 24 11.11pm
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle Exactly how many see the BBC then. One difference being that the Daily Mail can't charge £3 a week whether you read it or not. This post needs a like button. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

16 Jun 24 11.11pm

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Exactly how many see the BBC then. One difference being that the Daily Mail can't charge £3 a week whether you read it or not.

This post needs a like button.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 17 Jun 24 6.06am
,...and yet, when this happens [Link] "Reform UK’s parliamentary candidate in Kemi Badenoch’s constituency has resigned after it emerged he previously urged people to vote for the BNP. A spokesman for Reform UK said “Mr StClair-Armstrong has tendered his resignation” after “the revelation of unacceptable historic social media comments”. So is this proper investigative journalism ? or a selective political digging for dirt , by a discredited media corps.? (first reported in The Times) You pays your money,... I disengage, I turn the page.
Alert a moderator to this post

Forest Hillbilly

in a hidey-hole 17 Jun 24 6.06am

,...and yet, when this happens
[Link]
"Reform UK’s parliamentary candidate in Kemi Badenoch’s constituency has resigned after it emerged he previously urged people to vote for the BNP.
A spokesman for Reform UK said “Mr StClair-Armstrong has tendered his resignation” after “the revelation of unacceptable historic social media comments”.

So is this proper investigative journalism ? or a selective political digging for dirt , by a discredited media corps.? (first reported in The Times)

You pays your money,...

I disengage, I turn the page.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 417 of 435 < 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

BBC (again)

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors