You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
September 19 2024 5.43pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 416 of 435 < 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 >

  

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 13 Jun 24 6.31pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Every independent study from sports bodies has found that men competing in women's sports is unfair. Some have set hormone limits - effectively excluding people born as men. Others have outright banned trans athletes at women's events. Others have let people who were previously men compete but have, obviously, faced problems - usually reversing their decisions quickly enough. Even the olympic council has found this - so they don't need to be experts, they can just be casual readers. Rather than the new trans crusader in charge of sports who nobody wants or needs. He could perhaps stick to sports rather than theoretical sociology. Sounds like he knows nothing about sports whatsoever.

With due respect, I think you are making the same mistake.

No one would argue that two very experienced female athletes aren't qualified about how to handle the kind of issues you describe.

They are, and these issues, whilst thorny, are gradually being resolved.

That though is not the same as being an expert on transgenderism itself. It's an entirely different subject that no one should pontificate about unless they are a genuine expert. Which ex-athlete sports presenters are not.

Those who reduce this subject to simplistic ideas based only on anatomy have no idea at all about the issue.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 13 Jun 24 6.33pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

some people need a scientist to tell them what a man or woman is.

.

our Elites in Ireland refuse to listen to the words of scientists, nor of any other experts.

its the new Voodoo religion of Woke-ism. The Truths & dictates of which do change every five minutes.

Edited by PalazioVecchio (13 Jun 2024 6.39pm)

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 13 Jun 24 8.46pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

With due respect, I think you are making the same mistake.

No one would argue that two very experienced female athletes aren't qualified about how to handle the kind of issues you describe.

They are, and these issues, whilst thorny, are gradually being resolved.

That though is not the same as being an expert on transgenderism itself. It's an entirely different subject that no one should pontificate about unless they are a genuine expert. Which ex-athlete sports presenters are not.

Those who reduce this subject to simplistic ideas based only on anatomy have no idea at all about the issue.

It would be reductionist of me to say that people who have transition surgery or hormone treatment seem to make it about anatomy too. But I do realise that most/ many probably don't go down that route in fairness.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 13 Jun 24 9.10pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

With due respect, I think you are making the same mistake.

No one would argue that two very experienced female athletes aren't qualified about how to handle the kind of issues you describe.

They are, and these issues, whilst thorny, are gradually being resolved.

That though is not the same as being an expert on transgenderism itself. It's an entirely different subject that no one should pontificate about unless they are a genuine expert. Which ex-athlete sports presenters are not.

Those who reduce this subject to simplistic ideas based only on anatomy have no idea at all about the issue.

You are missing the key point, on purpose no doubt.

The guy compared trans athletes to Jamaican sprinters and Ethiopian long distance runners.
That is an absurd comparison and one that should get him sacked.

As has been suggested. It should come as no surprise that the BBC would employ such a nutcase.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 13 Jun 24 9.24pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

You are missing the key point, on purpose no doubt.

The guy compared trans athletes to Jamaican sprinters and Ethiopian long distance runners.
That is an absurd comparison and one that should get him sacked.

As has been suggested. It should come as no surprise that the BBC would employ such a nutcase.

That was stupid, but was a side issue. It was the transgender remark that caused the upset.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 13 Jun 24 9.26pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That was stupid, but was a side issue. It was the transgender remark that caused the upset.

Hardly. Someone who believes that is not fit to be in charge of sport.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 13 Jun 24 9.42pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Hardly. Someone who believes that is not fit to be in charge of sport.

Was he in charge of anything when he said it?

Did he believe it or try to make a very inappropriate analogy?

All of us make those kind of silly mistakes. Most of us don’t have them displayed by the Mail much later as part of a restless campaign against the BBC.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 14 Jun 24 7.18am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

With due respect, I think you are making the same mistake.

No one would argue that two very experienced female athletes aren't qualified about how to handle the kind of issues you describe.

They are, and these issues, whilst thorny, are gradually being resolved.

That though is not the same as being an expert on transgenderism itself. It's an entirely different subject that no one should pontificate about unless they are a genuine expert. Which ex-athlete sports presenters are not.

Those who reduce this subject to simplistic ideas based only on anatomy have no idea at all about the issue.

You are dismissing their views. They are both elite athletes who have a lot to say about their sport. You do not have to be an expert on Trans issues to point out the obvious unfairness of a 6ft muscle bound "woman" towering over "her" competitors.

It's not just elite sport, girls are now losing out at school sports days for the same issue. At a recent netball game a "Woman" massively bigger than the rest actually injured 3 girls.

I think it is perfectly reasonable for people to question the fairness of this and to ask their sports association what are they doing to ensure basic fairness across their sport.

Most sports are now introducing open competitions alongside their male and female events.

Edited by Badger11 (14 Jun 2024 7.19am)

Edited by Badger11 (14 Jun 2024 7.21am)

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 14 Jun 24 9.17am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

You are dismissing their views. They are both elite athletes who have a lot to say about their sport. You do not have to be an expert on Trans issues to point out the obvious unfairness of a 6ft muscle bound "woman" towering over "her" competitors.

It's not just elite sport, girls are now losing out at school sports days for the same issue. At a recent netball game a "Woman" massively bigger than the rest actually injured 3 girls.

I think it is perfectly reasonable for people to question the fairness of this and to ask their sports association what are they doing to ensure basic fairness across their sport.

Most sports are now introducing open competitions alongside their male and female events.

Edited by Badger11 (14 Jun 2024 7.19am)

Edited by Badger11 (14 Jun 2024 7.21am)

Not at all. They are fully entitled to their views on THIS subject which, because of their experience deserve to be taken seriously.

That though isn’t the issue. It’s not how transgender people should be accommodated within sport that was the issue.

It was transgenderism itself that was. Something that is highly personal to each individual experiencing gender dysphasia. Something that only experts can even attempt to understand.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 14 Jun 24 10.19am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Was he in charge of anything when he said it?

Did he believe it or try to make a very inappropriate analogy?

All of us make those kind of silly mistakes. Most of us don’t have them displayed by the Mail much later as part of a restless campaign against the BBC.

Not all of us are employed by the BBC and have a public voice.

Sack him now.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 14 Jun 24 10.34pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Not all of us are employed by the BBC and have a public voice.

Sack him now.

I don’t think he was employed by the BBC at the time he made the remarks. If the Daily Mail trawled though anyone’s dustbin and media records don’t you think they could find something to present in a way that looked bad?

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 15 Jun 24 10.55am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I don’t think he was employed by the BBC at the time he made the remarks. If the Daily Mail trawled though anyone’s dustbin and media records don’t you think they could find something to present in a way that looked bad?

That makes it all the worse. If they were aware of his opinions, they knowingly employed that idiot.

If they didn't know, they do now. Sack him.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 416 of 435 < 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)