This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
manwitheagletattoo Somewhere in England 18 Sep 20 9.30pm | |
---|---|
If this transfer and fee are true than I think it’s good business we have our money back that we paid for him, with a bit extra, which will go to another signing. For whatever reason Sorloth couldn’t cut it in Premier league, be it game time, the weight of the transfer fee we paid for him, the speed of the game. only he knows He has had one good season in a league nowhere near the standard of the premiership. There is no guarantee that he is going to cut the mustard at Leipzig
South London & Proud |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 18 Sep 20 11.18pm | |
---|---|
Just out on interest have you seen the loan deal, or the documents in respect of the sale to RLBand distribution of proceeds ? As ALL the chat on here has been speculation I don't see a working knowledge of contract law is relevant unless a copy of the documents are in hand. At the end of the day it will be much less of a waste of money than Wickham and IMO Benteke. Originally posted by palace99
As Sorloth had already refused to return to Turkey he broke the loan not Palace. I am amazed we have agreed a 50:50 split. The Turks paid £5m for a 2 year loan which predominantly just covers his wages. I suspect this was being paid in installments too. I am amazed we've paid them more than £5m to cover that payment. Anybody who says this is a good deal knows nothing about contract law - and there were many on here who thought we'd get zero only a few weeks ago
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 18 Sep 20 11.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
Just out on interest have you seen the loan deal, or the documents in respect of the sale to RLBand distribution of proceeds ? As ALL the chat on here has been speculation I don't see a working knowledge of contract law is relevant unless a copy of the documents are in hand. At the end of the day it will be much less of a waste of money than Wickham and IMO Benteke. I agree with you Owen. Clearly it was relevant what clauses were in the contract. It has become the basis of some kind of chess game with four players that each had radically different objectives. We just don’t know the details of the stratagems. And how the contract created the playing field.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Den1923 19 Sep 20 3.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
I agree with you Owen. Clearly it was relevant what clauses were in the contract. It has become the basis of some kind of chess game with four players that each had radically different objectives. We just don’t know the details of the stratagems. And how the contract created the playing field. Yes I agree also, this whole situation is somewhat speculative because we do not really know exactly what the loan deal was in terms of the small print etc, clearly the fact that we could not break the deal was an error and has to be down to the CP legal department and its advisors, no doubt the truth will come out eventually but in the meantime it is what it is and we just have to be grateful that we are getting something back and as far as Sorloth is concerned we really did not give him enough support as a club to adjust from the Norwegian league to the pace of the PL but as I have already said it is what it is and we have to move on hopefully quickly!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jacey 19 Sep 20 4.33pm | |
---|---|
Our Alex is getting very discerning these days!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
A1969Eagle Redhill 19 Sep 20 6.17pm | |
---|---|
Hi Originally posted by Den1923
Yes I agree also, this whole situation is somewhat speculative because we do not really know exactly what the loan deal was in terms of the small print etc, clearly the fact that we could not break the deal was an error and has to be down to the CP legal department and its advisors, no doubt the truth will come out eventually but in the meantime it is what it is and we just have to be grateful that we are getting something back and as far as Sorloth is concerned we really did not give him enough support as a club to adjust from the Norwegian league to the pace of the PL but as I have already said it is what it is and we have to move on hopefully quickly!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 20 Sep 20 2.28am | |
---|---|
and " club info " is what exactly? Must be difficult for you to fuel your Roy hatred when we have 6 points from two games, best ever start in PL, but confident you'll find a way Originally posted by A1969Eagle
Hi Edited by HKOwen (20 Sep 2020 2.30am) Edited by HKOwen (20 Sep 2020 2.31am)
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
palace99 New Mills 20 Sep 20 12.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EddieMac
You may know about contracts but you don’t know about this one. Eddie - not only are you showing your lack of knowledge re contracts you clearly don't understand how loans work re previous comments (using your logic Swansea can command a % of fee if Liverpool sell Brewster). I'll keep it simple - a player can only be owned by 1 club at a time. Sorloth is owned by Palace so all negotiations should be with us. A bit like a house owner renting his home out and then decides to sell. Clearly the loan deal adds a complication but it doesn't change the fact, Sorloth is our player. Yes people are reasonably happy we are almost getting our money back (we paid adds on for staying up in seasons 1 and 2) and it is clearly better than the 6m Euro deal but we have proved yet again poor negotiators. Don't bother replying, your opinion is irrelevant
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
palace99 New Mills 20 Sep 20 12.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
Just out on interest have you seen the loan deal, or the documents in respect of the sale to RLBand distribution of proceeds ? As ALL the chat on here has been speculation I don't see a working knowledge of contract law is relevant unless a copy of the documents are in hand. At the end of the day it will be much less of a waste of money than Wickham and IMO Benteke. what a stupid comment. Clearly there was no clause re distribution of proceeds re a sell as if there was there would be no need to negotiate the split. It is due to not having these clauses that has created the complications. How hard is it to understand that???
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 20 Sep 20 5.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by palace99
what a stupid comment. Clearly there was no clause re distribution of proceeds re a sell as if there was there would be no need to negotiate the split. It is due to not having these clauses that has created the complications. How hard is it to understand that??? What a rude and patronising response. You have absolutely no idea what was or was not in the contract and the negotiations could have been for any number of reasons. If you wish to patronise people kindly make sure that you are on solid ground first to avoid ending up looking like a dork
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jacey 20 Sep 20 8.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
What a rude and patronising response. You have absolutely no idea what was or was not in the contract and the negotiations could have been for any number of reasons. If you wish to patronise people kindly make sure that you are on solid ground first to avoid ending up looking like a dork Midland, A dork.Haven't heard that term before.Did you mean dick??
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 20 Sep 20 8.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by palace99
Eddie - not only are you showing your lack of knowledge re contracts you clearly don't understand how loans work re previous comments (using your logic Swansea can command a % of fee if Liverpool sell Brewster). I'll keep it simple - a player can only be owned by 1 club at a time. Sorloth is owned by Palace so all negotiations should be with us. A bit like a house owner renting his home out and then decides to sell. Clearly the loan deal adds a complication but it doesn't change the fact, Sorloth is our player. Yes people are reasonably happy we are almost getting our money back (we paid adds on for staying up in seasons 1 and 2) and it is clearly better than the 6m Euro deal but we have proved yet again poor negotiators. Don't bother replying, your opinion is irrelevant I think many on here may suggest your opinion is irrelevant
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.