This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
.TUX. 29 Apr 18 1.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
But this is boom and bust. If 2008 can't take the system down nothing can. The taxpayer is the lender of last resort. We haven't recovered.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 29 Apr 18 2.42pm | |
---|---|
That's what these fruitcakes can't elude to in their analysis. For them it's like we suffered an inconvenient blip.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 29 Apr 18 2.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by johnno42000
That's ok as I'll worry as I have a full brain. You obviously don't worry so I guess by your own statement you only have half a brain? Well then Mr full brain you then contradict yourself by worrying as your initial post suggested we shouldn't believe those suggesting Russian intervention into Labour. Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Apr 2018 2.47pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 29 Apr 18 2.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by serial thriller
Ah yes. Rationality. Self-reflection. Because at the moment, the enlightened policy makers at the helm of our society have seen in-work poverty increase to 3.8 million. Productivity remains at historic lows, growth has completely stagnated despite near-0 interest rates, hospitals don't have enough beds in A&E, most young people can't afford a property and every indicator points to the fact that one more tumult in global markets will cause this country to spiral back in to recession. If we were living under a Labour government with those figures people would undoubtedly be saying 'well this is what you get with socialism'. But because it's the tories, who are meant to be the pragmatists, these figures must simply be bizarre anomalies or administrative errors. How about a little self-reflection on your part Stirling? Or is it going to be finger pointing and deflection? Poverty levels are indicative of globalization, which as a lefty you no doubt support. They are also the effects of the 2008 realities that will take at least another ten years without bust to even reasonably recover from......just like the depression in the twenties wasn't even fully recovered from until after WW2. You, of course, being part of that non reflective Corbyn cast aren't interested in those realities. Instead you just waffle on as though this country hadn't been though the worst economic western failure for ninety years as you compare statistics now to pre collapse times. As I say, if elected Corbyn will wreck this economy from its inching recovery......and personally I'm pretty sure that people like yourself will be nowhere to be found to account for what you said. As they say, success has many fathers but failure is an orphan. I almost hope Corbyn wins because I want to see the wreckage of your ideology struggle to reconcile with the reality of how economics actually works. Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Apr 2018 3.31pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
serial thriller The Promised Land 29 Apr 18 3.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Poverty levels are indicative of globalization, which as a lefty you no doubt support. They are also the effects of the 2008 realities that will take at least another ten years without bust to even reasonably recover from......just like the depression in the twenties wasn't even fully recovered from until after WW2. You, of course, being part of that non reflective Corbyn cast aren't interested in those realities. Instead you just waffle on as though this country hadn't been though the worst economic western failure for ninety years as you compare statistics now to pre collapse times. As I say, if elected Corbyn will wreck this economy from its inching recovery......and personally I'm pretty sure that people like yourself will be nowhere to be found to account for what you said. As they say, success has many fathers but failure is an orphan. Like I say, I almost hope Corbyn wins because I want to see the wreckage of your ideology struggle to reconcile with the reality of how economics actually works. Isn't it interesting how the post-2008 economic demise - almost unanimously blamed on Labour and Gordon Brown by the right for years - is now a globalised issue, and the consequences of it are no longer political but fateful now the Tories are in. I guess we shouldn't mention that post-crash the only European country whose wages have fallen more sharply than ours is Greece...
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 29 Apr 18 3.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by serial thriller
Isn't it interesting how the post-2008 economic demise - almost unanimously blamed on Labour and Gordon Brown by the right for years - is now a globalised issue, and the consequences of it are no longer political but fateful now the Tories are in. I guess we shouldn't mention that post-crash the only European country whose wages have fallen more sharply than ours is Greece... Sure there were plenty on the right, opportunists most of them who blamed Labour for the collapse......not me or anyone with common sense. What Labour do deserve blame for was in not having any economic reserve. But that's the left on economic policy all over. But 2008 was obviously the banking sector, neither party had policies that would have made any difference to what happened. If nothing else, it showed the difference between politics and what actually funds it. How little influence politics has in the real world compared to the world of money.....If the far left think they can screw the capitalists and win all they are going to do is worsen the lives of the poorest far far more. But that's the socialists all over. All they do is keep the poor in even worse poverty than they were before while lying to them about who's fault it is....and of course there's always an endless supply of dimwits willing to man the barricades. Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Apr 2018 3.30pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 29 Apr 18 3.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Sure there were plenty on the right, opportunists most of them who blamed Labour for the collapse......not me or anyone with common sense. What Labour do deserve blame for was in not having any economic reserve. But that's the left on economic policy all over. But 2008 was obviously the banking sector, neither party had policies that would have made any difference to what happened. If nothing else, it showed the difference between politics and what actually funds it. How little influence politics has in the real world compared to the world of money.....If the far left think they can screw the capitalists and win all they are going to do is worsen the lives of the poorest far far more. But that's the socialists all over. All they do is keep the poor in even worse poverty than they were before while lying to them about who's fault it is....and of course there's always an endless supply of dimwits willing to man the barricades. Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Apr 2018 3.30pm) No, socialism delivered health welfare and education to everybody, before you may simply have been excluded. your life depended on whether you could pay. We should remember that in our criticism, that prior to post war labour we may have suffered adversity as most of us expect at some time, and simply been left helpless.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnno42000 29 Apr 18 4.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Well then Mr full brain you then contradict yourself by worrying as your initial post suggested we shouldn't believe those suggesting Russian intervention into Labour. Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Apr 2018 2.47pm) Please read what I posted HB. I said wary, ie be cautious. So I worry about the possibility of a made up fact not that the Russians have been involved.
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 29 Apr 18 4.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by johnno42000
Please read what I posted HB. I said wary, ie be cautious. So I worry about the possibility of a made up fact not that the Russians have been involved. You're too dim to realise your own contradictions. You think you can point score with silly word play and trip up over yourself.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 29 Apr 18 5.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Poverty levels are indicative of globalization, which as a lefty you no doubt support. They are also the effects of the 2008 realities that will take at least another ten years without bust to even reasonably recover from......just like the depression in the twenties wasn't even fully recovered from until after WW2. You, of course, being part of that non reflective Corbyn cast aren't interested in those realities. Instead you just waffle on as though this country hadn't been though the worst economic western failure for ninety years as you compare statistics now to pre collapse times. As I say, if elected Corbyn will wreck this economy from its inching recovery......and personally I'm pretty sure that people like yourself will be nowhere to be found to account for what you said. As they say, success has many fathers but failure is an orphan. I almost hope Corbyn wins because I want to see the wreckage of your ideology struggle to reconcile with the reality of how economics actually works. Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Apr 2018 3.31pm) Everything to do with, shock horror, Central Banking policy...........because they can, and do, continually.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnno42000 29 Apr 18 6.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
You're too dim to realise your own contradictions. You think you can point score with silly word play and trip up over yourself. What a delightful HB you are.
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 29 Apr 18 6.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
No, socialism delivered health welfare and education to everybody, before you may simply have been excluded. your life depended on whether you could pay. We should remember that in our criticism, that prior to post war labour we may have suffered adversity as most of us expect at some time, and simply been left helpless. Actually that was borrowed American money.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.