You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
November 22 2024 4.36pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 407 of 435 < 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 >

  

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 28 Apr 24 9.32am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Not as much reality as his victims have had to face.

Probably not but reality nevertheless.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 28 Apr 24 9.39am Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

As I have said several times the BBC have accepted their failings and taken steps to ensure they aren’t repeated. I have also pointed out that without actual evidence taking action isn’t possible. Lots of rumours raises suspicions but they aren’t enough. It wasn’t just the BBC. His activities at both Broadmoor and Stoke Mandeville were missed by the NHS for years.

The steps they took weren't very effective. This is about Huw Edwards.

The BBC accepted there were "lessons to be learned following this exercise", and the organisation's group chief operating officer will assess whether protocols and procedures are appropriate.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 28 Apr 24 9.57am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I think we must wait and see if that is true or not. That evidence is emerging that there might have been other complaints doesn’t mean they weren’t investigated and found untrue or unproven. What it means is that there is now a system whereby such complaints can be lodged. You would not expect them to be publicised!

I think that is evidence that the BBC has learned its lesson and that no one is untouchable.

I think the evidence is showing that after 2 separate complaints they then received another complaint from a member of the public about their child and did very little about it.

You would think that once a person has been investigated for inappropriate behaviour even if there was little or no evidence to support that claim, that further complaints from different people would at least ring alarm bells.

So no I don't think the BBC has learned its lesson. It only acted when the complainer went public.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 28 Apr 24 10.05am Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

I think the evidence is showing that after 2 separate complaints they then received another complaint from a member of the public about their child and did very little about it.

You would think that once a person has been investigated for inappropriate behaviour even if there was little or no evidence to support that claim, that further complaints from different people would at least ring alarm bells.

So no I don't think the BBC has learned its lesson. It only acted when the complainer went public.

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 28 Apr 24 10.24am Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

This will please Wisbeach(unfortunately} The bbc wants more funding for its world service on top of the £100m it gets from the FO to promote 'UK values' . . . [Link]

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 28 Apr 24 10.28am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Pretty damming about BBC procedures and if the latest revelations are true about previous complaints it just makes it worse.

I didn't understand the comment that the BBC would not put complaints to a member of staff until verified.

If I was innocent and management had a file on me I would be livid that they had not spoken to me even if the complaints were false, very odd.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 28 Apr 24 8.22pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

I think the evidence is showing that after 2 separate complaints they then received another complaint from a member of the public about their child and did very little about it.

You would think that once a person has been investigated for inappropriate behaviour even if there was little or no evidence to support that claim, that further complaints from different people would at least ring alarm bells.

So no I don't think the BBC has learned its lesson. It only acted when the complainer went public.

Untrue. It was investigating before that. The first stage of which, understandably, was to verify identities, which was stymied by a lack of responses from the family member complainant. The lack of a response and subsequent contacting of the Sun carries a nasty odour and raises red flags about possible motivations.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 28 Apr 24 8.26pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

I think that timeline shows that the BBC acted reasonably at all stages. You could argue they could have done more early on but until they are satisfied the complainant is who they say they are you can also argue they ought not to.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 28 Apr 24 8.36pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by eagleman13

This will please Wisbeach(unfortunately} The bbc wants more funding for its world service on top of the £100m it gets from the FO to promote 'UK values' . . . [Link]

Yes it does. The BBC World Service is one of our countries greatest assets. It’s a source of trusted news in many places where the national broadcasters are state controlled. For the UK to be seen as trustworthy and reliable is vital at a time when such things are in short supply.

The World Service uses the reporters, and much of the programming, that the UK based service does. Weaken these in any way would be like scoring a hatful of own goals.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 28 Apr 24 8.38pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I think that timeline shows that the BBC acted reasonably at all stages. You could argue they could have done more early on but until they are satisfied the complainant is who they say they are you can also argue they ought not to.

OK, carry on thinking that. Let's wait for the next time this happens and take comfort that lessons have been learned.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 28 Apr 24 9.08pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Untrue. It was investigating before that. The first stage of which, understandably, was to verify identities, which was stymied by a lack of responses from the family member complainant. The lack of a response and subsequent contacting of the Sun carries a nasty odour and raises red flags about possible motivations.


Oh I get it, they are the wrong type of victim because it's the Sun.

As far as I am aware they have not asked for any money just that Edwards back off and stop paying their child money.

You conveniently ignored the BBC response

"The BBC accepted there were "lessons to be learned following this exercise",* and the organisation's group chief operating officer will assess whether protocols and procedures are appropriate."

*Just like the time before and the time before that and the time....

Edited by Badger11 (28 Apr 2024 9.09pm)

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nhp61 Flag Goring-By-Sea born, now in Brackne... 29 Apr 24 3.27pm Send a Private Message to nhp61 Add nhp61 as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

How much did the BBC know about Phillip Schofield?

Is there actually anyone straight working at the BBC?

I do believe that Scarlett Moffatt is one of the few straight people on the BBC's books.

However, she is most probably on their books because she ticks the box marked "cerebrally challenged"...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 407 of 435 < 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)