This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 09 Jan 23 12.27am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
I had no idea who Goddard was, but I still think it points to a broken police service Indeed, it's about the communications act and not about some activist the left don't like.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 09 Jan 23 1.36am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don’t want to get into another long disagreement with you on this as I recognise we see this situation very differently but could I encourage you to read the tweet again? What is being said is not that they are spending time and money trying to ”be” anything but they are trying to be recognised and accepted as something. They already believe they are that something, even if you and the 3 girls don’t yet agree. If those feelings are sincere then respecting them seems a kindness to me. If you Google this individual you might want to hold back on the respect and kindness.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 09 Jan 23 7.53am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
You’re flirting with insanity Wisbech. The tweet says things like ‘I f**king hate them’, talking about women, from a bloke wanting to be one. Hates them for being women, nothing else. Does not mention any interaction with them, just about a women who stood him up as he was not a woman despite saying he is and therefore expressing extreme hate towards other women with no valid reasoning. It’s a bit like me wanting to be recognised as a palace player, believing I am or being encouraged to believe I am and then demonstrating extreme hostility when sat next to Wilf, Marc and Joachim somewhere. I can recognise you choose not to believe this, which I too wish not to ‘get into’ but I would suggest that if you push an ideological reality and narrative that does not align with actual reality you can see the hate, as articulated in the tweet, and possible consequences that may arise as a result of this. It must all be very confusing and mind bending to the individual least of all extremely distressing. I had to read that tweet several times before I understood it, very confusing like the tweeter. The comment about hating women is interesting. It may have been Jenni Murray certainly a well know feminist who pointed out that there is a strong whiff of misogyny amongst the Trans community they want to be women but hate women and hate lesbians who wont date Trans women. As for the rest of us normies sigh.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 09 Jan 23 8.12am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
. As I said I know we don’t agree on this but when they say they hate them I am pretty sure that’s a cry of frustration and not a statement of fact. They feel they are a woman. What you or I think is an irrelevance. What matters are their feelings. That whole tweet is frustration on fire. What I am suggesting is that we all need to be sensitive to the way others perceive themselves and stop trying to impose our own beliefs on them. We wouldn’t like to be regarded as something we don’t believe we are. Why expect it of others? You mention the word 'believe' several times and that we 'must be sensitive to the way others perceive themselves'. I do not believe they are women, nor do I believe they are men. I have accepted scientific fact based upon biological metrics about them. I will pass on your sentiments however to the Ballon D'or committee and hopefully they will accelerate my application for attendance and nomination on the basis of, and sensitivity towards, my belief I am the greatest footballer in the world. I can only imagine the anger that might arise from me not being accepted as a result of others not indulging in my fantasy, god forbid I then take action upon this, or action against those who actually are footballers. I may even assault one of them, sexually or otherwise. I believe all people should get behind me and reinforce this imagined 'belief' that I have. I will pass on your HoL details to France Football and perhaps you can back up my case?
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 09 Jan 23 9.29am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
You mention the word 'believe' several times and that we 'must be sensitive to the way others perceive themselves'. I do not believe they are women, nor do I believe they are men. I have accepted scientific fact based upon biological metrics about them. I will pass on your sentiments however to the Ballon D'or committee and hopefully they will accelerate my application for attendance and nomination on the basis of, and sensitivity towards, my belief I am the greatest footballer in the world. I can only imagine the anger that might arise from me not being accepted as a result of others not indulging in my fantasy, god forbid I then take action upon this, or action against those who actually are footballers. I may even assault one of them, sexually or otherwise. I believe all people should get behind me and reinforce this imagined 'belief' that I have. I will pass on your HoL details to France Football and perhaps you can back up my case? . You identify the gulf in attitude that divides the way the two groups think about this very effectively. Yours is based in simple biology and is constrained by it. The other acknowledges that biology can make mistakes and that there is more to sexuality than just physically. Science backs both view points. The biology is unarguable. The doctors specialising in gender dysphoria are psychologists, which is also a scientifically based discipline. I find just as hard as you to understand this. It is counter intuitive. I have though witnessed it at first hand so know that it’s very real and something that’s not wanted.It just is. Maybe we should leave it there.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 09 Jan 23 9.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don’t want to get into another long disagreement with you on this as I recognise we see this situation very differently but could I encourage you to read the tweet again? What is being said is not that they are spending time and money trying to ”be” anything but they are trying to be recognised and accepted as something. They already believe they are that something, even if you and the 3 girls don’t yet agree. If those feelings are sincere then respecting them seems a kindness to me. Where does it say the women ( they are not girls) do not agree? There is no mention of any interaction between the parties, so is this just your take?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 09 Jan 23 10.15am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
. You identify the gulf in attitude that divides the way the two groups think about this very effectively. Yours is based in simple biology and is constrained by it. The other acknowledges that biology can make mistakes and that there is more to sexuality than just physically. Science backs both view points. The biology is unarguable. The doctors specialising in gender dysphoria are psychologists, which is also a scientifically based discipline. I find just as hard as you to understand this. It is counter intuitive. I have though witnessed it at first hand so know that it’s very real and something that’s not wanted.It just is. Maybe we should leave it there. I think I have failed to really stamp my case on this by too often resorting to facetious remarks/posts. What you have articulated there is fine as far as I am concerned. It's all very grey and very hard to distinctly and categorically pin down. Psychology only ever really exists as a hypothetical science however and is very, very often treated as scientific fact where it can never, 100%, infallibly be. Where my grievance lies is not with the exploration, investigation or, what I would deem to be appropriate, a humanistic approach to 'transgenderism'. My grievance is with the ideological and active promotion of this as some sort or alternative, cultural movement. I think firstly in obfuscates, detracts and seriously harms any scientific investigation but also has very severe consequences for individuals who get drawn into or indoctrinated by this ideological approach. There is a shocking and appalling suicide rate aligned to transgenderism which is falsely attributed to societal rejection of the 'ism' and has seriously ignored the possibility of individuals being led to believe they are 'transgender' when actually their issues, which as stated often lead to suicide, lie elsewhere and go untreated and exacerbated through being hijacked by ideologues or idiots. Transgenderism often suits a narrative for a course of action some individuals are looking to pursue as opposed to being of genuine concern as a stand alone entity to them. Those looking for 'acceptance' I can, even if I don't understand, certainly make room for as a human being. What I reject is having the fabric and laws of society changed and being constantly bombarded with ideological propaganda by a 'movement' which, as far as I am concerned, is seeking to achieve that which lies separately to it's smokescreen, purported ideals - treating people with dignity and understanding them. The end result of my aforementioned scenario would be an infringement on the likes of freedom of speech, suppression of individual thought and a very severe disturbance in the mindset of some, you know, to the extent they actively and very publicly start expressing their hatred for almost half of peoples due to nothing else than their, 100% scientifically backed, biological categorisation or start killing themselves if not others. This does not bode well at all and given enough momentum could result in severe consequences for human beings en masse if we are not seeing it in small scale or individual instances already.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 09 Jan 23 10.23am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
Where my grievance lies is not with the exploration, investigation or, what I would deem to be appropriate, a humanistic approach to 'transgenderism'. My grievance is with the ideological and active promotion of this as some sort or alternative, cultural movement. I think firstly in obfuscates, detracts and seriously harms any scientific investigation but also has very severe consequences for individuals who get drawn into or indoctrinated by this ideological approach. There is a shocking and appalling suicide rate aligned to transgenderism which is falsely attributed to societal rejection of the 'ism' and has seriously ignored the possibility of individuals being led to believe they are 'transgender' when actually their issues, which as stated often lead to suicide, lie elsewhere and go untreated and exacerbated through being hijacked by ideologues or idiots. Transgenderism often suits a narrative for a course of action some individuals are looking to pursue as opposed to being of genuine concern as a stand alone entity to them.
That's awfully intellectual for a footie forum Don't tell anyone but I didn't understand a word of it
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 09 Jan 23 10.47am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
That's awfully intellectual for a footie forum Don't tell anyone but I didn't understand a word of it Midlands your troubles lie far deeper I am afraid if you are referring to anything I post as 'intellectual' Just call it 'rambling' and we can all breathe a little easier until we go back to Palace Talk and face that reality!
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 09 Jan 23 1.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
. You identify the gulf in attitude that divides the way the two groups think about this very effectively. Yours is based in simple biology and is constrained by it. The other acknowledges that biology can make mistakes and that there is more to sexuality than just physically. Science backs both view points. The biology is unarguable. The doctors specialising in gender dysphoria are psychologists, which is also a scientifically based discipline. I find just as hard as you to understand this. It is counter intuitive. I have though witnessed it at first hand so know that it’s very real and something that’s not wanted.It just is. Maybe we should leave it there. There isn't one form of man, just as there isn't one form of woman. It's commentary like yours which refuses to recognise mental illness and gender dysphoria. It is not a kindness.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 09 Jan 23 1.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
Midlands your troubles lie far deeper I am afraid if you are referring to anything I post as 'intellectual' Just call it 'rambling' and we can all breathe a little easier until we go back to Palace Talk and face that reality! I think you pretty much nailed it.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 09 Jan 23 5.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
That's awfully intellectual for a footie forum Don't tell anyone but I didn't understand a word of it Wouldn’t you be suicidal if someone cut your nuts off !
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.