This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
MrWhyNot 08 Jan 23 7.33pm | |
---|---|
Goddard physically assualted and threatened a photographer. He has confronted politicians multiple times using language and methods that would very reasonably make a person fear that he was going to go the same. As I say we live in a time where individuals do go from the 'traitor' language to acting on it in fatal ways. Best not to let it get to that point. All I know of Carl Benjamin is that he was a UKIP MP who would get attention through publicity seeking statements. There's a video of calling a disabled girl a retard for effect, one of him repeatedly laughing about Heather Heyers getting run over and killed during Charlottesville. He also repeated joked about raping ("I wouldn't even rape you" ) and indeed implying he would actually rape ("with enough pressure I might cave”) before tagging on another punchline, a female politician who had expressed concerned over previous sexual assault comments. As result she received a significant number of actual direct rape threats and understandably felt concerned that this might endanger her safety. He was investigated and it was taken no further, as was someone who threw a milkshake at him. I'm happy for people to say and joke about what they wish, and so disagree with anything physical but beyond that public judgement is likely to be passed on such repugnant, unfunny targeted conduct. He's a Father with kids, not a teenager. Personally, I'd much rather someone throw a milkshake at me, than have countless men repeatedly threaten to rape my partner. I do understand that demeaning and controlling women does play very well in some political quarters. Arguably that's true on both left and right really, with fair concerns about womens spaces due to the trans issue, incel types being told that women have little worth and are there to be used, the know your place list goes on. Perhaps whatever our politics, we could at least try elevating those who don't behave as if they've just crawled out of the gutter. Edited by MrWhyNot (08 Jan 2023 7.36pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 08 Jan 23 7.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
If you gaze into the abyss, sometimes the abyss can gaze back at you. This world has been seriously fecked up. The indoctrinated ideas are hugely damaging and leading nowhere positive. [Tweet Link] If you “spend your life and savings” trying to be something, it must be a pretty safe bet to say you are not that thing. Still though, great to promote it as an ideology then perversely recognise it as law as it will mitigate the impact of your failure to find happiness in life so you don’t end up topping yourself or others… oh… wait,
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
berlinpalace berlin 08 Jan 23 7.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Well in my view this is an awful law ripe for misuse and being misused here. Unless this guy is physically threatening someone it shouldn't be the Police's business. Otherwise if he is libeling someone the courts are available. You are fully entitled to your view of Goddard....though it should be noted that displaying a dislike for someone or thing is exactly how this law could be applied....which in my view is a disfigurement. I would also defend your right to opinions that I don't like. This was the norm in this country for many generations. ‘In one video filmed earlier this month and posted on Twitter, he shouts at a police officer: “You want a war I’ll give you a war. You want it, it’s on. Every Saturday, you are fair game.” When the officer says he is “not deaf, you don’t have to shout”, Goddard responds: “You’re not even British.”‘
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
MrWhyNot 08 Jan 23 8.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by berlinpalace
‘In one video filmed earlier this month and posted on Twitter, he shouts at a police officer: “You want a war I’ll give you a war. You want it, it’s on. Every Saturday, you are fair game.” When the officer says he is “not deaf, you don’t have to shout”, Goddard responds: “You’re not even British.”‘ People like this guy intentionally burn down their own house for the purpose of blaming society for doing so. Time rich they prefer it to a 9-5. Zero contribution, maximum mouth. Little different from types who have time to attend 100 environmental protests a week, then fly around the world on an eternal gap year. They crave attention, there's little genuine principle to it. Theatre. It furthers no cause, and if nobody was paying attention most of them would be on a settee, stoned or drunk. I suppose when I put it like that, at least it gets them out of the house. Edited by MrWhyNot (08 Jan 2023 9.07pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 08 Jan 23 11.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
If you “spend your life and savings” trying to be something, it must be a pretty safe bet to say you are not that thing. Still though, great to promote it as an ideology then perversely recognise it as law as it will mitigate the impact of your failure to find happiness in life so you don’t end up topping yourself or others… oh… wait, I don’t want to get into another long disagreement with you on this as I recognise we see this situation very differently but could I encourage you to read the tweet again? What is being said is not that they are spending time and money trying to ”be” anything but they are trying to be recognised and accepted as something. They already believe they are that something, even if you and the 3 girls don’t yet agree. If those feelings are sincere then respecting them seems a kindness to me.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 08 Jan 23 11.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don’t want to get into another long disagreement with you on this as I recognise we see this situation very differently but could I encourage you to read the tweet again? What is being said is not that they are spending time and money trying to ”be” anything but they are trying to be recognised and accepted as something. They already believe they are that something, even if you and the 3 girls don’t yet agree. If those feelings are sincere then respecting them seems a kindness to me. You’re flirting with insanity Wisbech. The tweet says things like ‘I f**king hate them’, talking about women, from a bloke wanting to be one. Hates them for being women, nothing else. Does not mention any interaction with them, just about a women who stood him up as he was not a woman despite saying he is and therefore expressing extreme hate towards other women with no valid reasoning. It’s a bit like me wanting to be recognised as a palace player, believing I am or being encouraged to believe I am and then demonstrating extreme hostility when sat next to Wilf, Marc and Joachim somewhere. I can recognise you choose not to believe this, which I too wish not to ‘get into’ but I would suggest that if you push an ideological reality and narrative that does not align with actual reality you can see the hate, as articulated in the tweet, and possible consequences that may arise as a result of this. It must all be very confusing and mind bending to the individual least of all extremely distressing.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 08 Jan 23 11.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by berlinpalace
‘In one video filmed earlier this month and posted on Twitter, he shouts at a police officer: “You want a war I’ll give you a war. You want it, it’s on. Every Saturday, you are fair game.” When the officer says he is “not deaf, you don’t have to shout”, Goddard responds: “You’re not even British.”‘ If Goddard is assaulting people then I have no issue, if that's an honest description of what happened. When you talk about 'inciting violence' (if these descriptions are a fair and not biased assessment) I'd also agree, however let's not forget the subjective example I gave in my last post on how these rules seem to be selectively applied. Anyway all 'assault' and 'inciting violence' offences are already covered under separate long existing laws and have never needed the communications act. And let's remind ourselves that was what I was posting on not about a specific person. Sure, we could talk about Goddard's situation specifically as he's quite a public figure when you look into him. However, this wasn't what I was talking about. Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Jan 2023 11.41pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 08 Jan 23 11.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I forgot that the I before E rule doesn't apply to dismal bellends. There's no I in Mapletree
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 09 Jan 23 12.03am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
You’re flirting with insanity Wisbech. The tweet says things like ‘I f**king hate them’, talking about women, from a bloke wanting to be one. Hates them for being women, nothing else. Does not mention any interaction with them, just about a women who stood him up as he was not a woman despite saying he is and therefore expressing extreme hate towards other women with no valid reasoning. It’s a bit like me wanting to be recognised as a palace player, believing I am or being encouraged to believe I am and then demonstrating extreme hostility when sat next to Wilf, Marc and Joachim somewhere. I can recognise you choose not to believe this, which I too wish not to ‘get into’ but I would suggest that if you push an ideological reality and narrative that does not align with actual reality you can see the hate, as articulated in the tweet, and possible consequences that may arise as a result of this. It must all be very confusing and mind bending to the individual least of all extremely distressing. "Flirting "? That's generous. This is the usual contrarian nonsense peddled by the poster.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 09 Jan 23 12.04am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
If Goddard is assaulting people then I have no issue, if that's an honest description of what happened. When you talk about 'inciting violence' (if these descriptions are a fair and not biased assessment) I'd also agree, however let's not forget the subjective example I gave in my last post on how these rules seem to be selectively applied. Anyway all 'assault' and 'inciting violence' offences are already covered under separate long existing laws and have never needed the communications act. And let's remind ourselves that was what I was posting on not about a specific person. Sure, we could talk about Goddard's situation specifically as he's quite a public figure when you look into him. However, this wasn't what I was talking about. Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Jan 2023 11.41pm) I had no idea who Goddard was, but I still think it points to a broken police service
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 09 Jan 23 12.05am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
You’re flirting with insanity Wisbech. The tweet says things like ‘I f**king hate them’, talking about women, from a blok e wanting to be one. Hates them for being women, nothing else. Does not mention any interaction with them, just about a women who stood him up as he was not a woman despite saying he is and therefore expressing extreme hate towards other women with no valid reasoning. It’s a bit like me wanting to be recognised as a palace player, believing I am or being encouraged to believe I am and then demonstrating extreme hostility when sat next to Wilf, Marc and Joachim somewhere. I can recognise you choose not to believe this, which I too wish not to ‘get into’ but I would suggest that if you push an ideological reality and narrative that does not align with actual reality you can see the hate, as articulated in the tweet, and possible consequences that may arise as a result of this. It must all be very confusing and mind bending to the individual least of all extremely distressing. . As I said I know we don’t agree on this but when they say they hate them I am pretty sure that’s a cry of frustration and not a statement of fact. They feel they are a woman. What you or I think is an irrelevance. What matters are their feelings. That whole tweet is frustration on fire. What I am suggesting is that we all need to be sensitive to the way others perceive themselves and stop trying to impose our own beliefs on them. We wouldn’t like to be regarded as something we don’t believe we are. Why expect it of others?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 09 Jan 23 12.23am | |
---|---|
It's almost amusing how WE cares about the feelings of certain demographics but not others. How very convenient. People with gender dysphoria have always been with us to some extent. I don't regard it as a kindness to promote and encourage a mental illness. The increase of people identifying as a different gender is a cultural trend that works against the family, something WE claimed he was for. What is a kindness is to help people lead a productive life. There have always been effeminate men and masculine women. A culture that ends in encouraging people to cut of body parts instead of learning to accept themselves and adapt is not a kindness. Edited by Stirlingsays (09 Jan 2023 12.24am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.