This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
I'm not saying that judges should overrule a jury's verdict. I'm saying that when the death penalty was the only sentence for those found guilty of murder, juries would acquit if they had the slightest doubt or sympathy. The judge determining whether the death penalty is appropriate is what I am proposing. Okay - understood. But I still feel queasy about one man (or woman) deciding whether or not someone should be executed.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by JRW2
Okay - understood. But I still feel queasy about one man (or woman) deciding whether or not someone should be executed. Think of it as putting down a dangerous dog who killed someone. No use, no hope, what a waste of oxygen!
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by JRW2
Okay - understood. But I still feel queasy about one man (or woman) deciding whether or not someone should be executed. That is my issue with capital punishment. In principle I am okay with it but I need to understand the mechanics e.g. who makes the decision. I also believe the public should have a vote on this and other matters.
One more point |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
That is my issue with capital punishment. In principle I am okay with it but I need to understand the mechanics e.g. who makes the decision. I also believe the public should have a vote on this and other matters. Sounds like you've got the makings of a new Saturday evening entertainment programme there Badger. Something like "Ant and Dec's Execution Party" where the public choose their favourite executioner and method from a weekly panel.
Living down here does have some advantages. At least you can see them cry. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by mezzer
Sounds like you've got the makings of a new Saturday evening entertainment programme there Badger. Something like "Ant and Dec's Execution Party" where the public choose their favourite executioner and method from a weekly panel. That’s too quick for me some serious consideration would need to go into it. I’d like to see big brother style, plenty of time to get to know and understand each one, 24/7 surveillance would see to it, with somebody voted ‘out’ every now and then. Also, new participants would inevitably be entered from time to time.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by mezzer
Sounds like you've got the makings of a new Saturday evening entertainment programme there Badger. Something like "Ant and Dec's Execution Party" where the public choose their favourite executioner and method from a weekly panel. I think that’s like Saudi law
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by mezzer
Sounds like you've got the makings of a new Saturday evening entertainment programme there Badger. Something like "Ant and Dec's Execution Party" where the public choose their favourite executioner and method from a weekly panel. Sorry not what I meant. I meant the public should be allowed referendums on important topics e.g. capital punishment / immigration not voting a death sentence ala "the Hunger Games".
One more point |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
I found it hilarious the description of him was based purely on the clothes he was wearing… as if he’s some sort of cartoon character. You can see the BBC exec saying ‘the picture is up there we don’t need to risk anything ourselves’. I've had (many years ago - I couldn't be bothered now) stand up rows with people who considered it racist to describe a person in a group they are referring to as "black". My debaters were not black people you understand. Black people are justifiably happy with their skin and couldn't possibly consider that offensive. No, well meaning but idiotic white people.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
I've had (many years ago - I couldn't be bothered now) stand up rows with people who considered it racist to describe a person in a group they are referring to as "black". My debaters were not black people you understand. Black people are justifiably happy with their skin and couldn't possibly consider that offensive. No, well meaning but idiotic white people. As I’ve quoted Malcom x before “why is the head of the snake white”.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
More scum. Is 10 years enough?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Not nearly. Let’s hope he receives similar treatment in prison.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
croydon proud ![]() |
|
---|---|
10 years is a joke, should be life without parole-minimum!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.