This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 09 Aug 22 3.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by YT
Do you think that water prices should be kept stable but there should be increased government expenditure on water infrastructure? I think that water companies should be held more accountable since they are providing an essential service. There must be a more stringent policy to ensure that companies continue to upgrade using a fair percentage of their profits because the current situation clearly isn't working.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 09 Aug 22 3.10pm | |
---|---|
Thames water considering a hose pipe ban.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 09 Aug 22 4.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I think that water companies should be held more accountable since they are providing an essential service. There must be a more stringent policy to ensure that companies continue to upgrade using a fair percentage of their profits because the current situation clearly isn't working. But in theory there is. They make lower profits by being able to charge less if they don't achieve their agreed infrastructure improvements. OfWat reports directly to Parliament, surely you aren't saying the Government isn't directing its work as strongly as it could?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ouzo Rafina 10 Aug 22 7.19am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
But in theory there is. They make lower profits by being able to charge less if they don't achieve their agreed infrastructure improvements. OfWat reports directly to Parliament, surely you aren't saying the Government isn't directing its work as strongly as it could? The problem is that with reduced profits they will never be able to afford to make infrastructure improvements required. I also don't see it as fair that in one area a company can charge it customers more just because it keeps it's infrastructure in a better condition. The customer is gaining nothing from this, except maybe avoiding a hosepipe ban.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 10 Aug 22 2.11pm | |
---|---|
Environment Agency pension fund criticised for owning stakes in UK water firms. The Environment Agency’s pension fund owns stakes in a string of British water firms – despite the watchdog calling for industry bosses to be jailed over shocking pollution levels. Thames Water has received an official warning from Ofwat about the accuracy of its data. Because its b****x hiding their disastrous polluting of the environment, their lack of accountability is quite incredible its as if the law did not apply to them.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 10 Aug 22 3.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
But in theory there is. They make lower profits by being able to charge less if they don't achieve their agreed infrastructure improvements. OfWat reports directly to Parliament, surely you aren't saying the Government isn't directing its work as strongly as it could? Ofwat like many of the other quangos is a toothless body and for that Parliament is too blame.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 10 Aug 22 5.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
Thames water considering a hose pipe ban. My cousin just rang from Crowborough - she was saying there's a hospipe ban. Simultaneously, the mains is burst in the street and water is flowing like a stream. Just about sums it all up really.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 10 Aug 22 7.11pm | |
---|---|
Water companies 'sold off reservoirs that could have eased drought'. Dozens of reservoirs across the country have been given up by water companies, while no new ones have been built in the last 30 years. Thames Water, Severn Trent and Southern Water are among those to have sold off some of their reservoirs in recent years. Water is the worst privatisation of all.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 10 Aug 22 7.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Water companies 'sold off reservoirs that could have eased drought'. Dozens of reservoirs across the country have been given up by water companies, while no new ones have been built in the last 30 years. Thames Water, Severn Trent and Southern Water are among those to have sold off some of their reservoirs in recent years. Water is the worst privatisation of all.
Sold off for what ?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 10 Aug 22 10.10pm | |
---|---|
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 11 Aug 22 5.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ouzo
The problem is that with reduced profits they will never be able to afford to make infrastructure improvements required. I also don't see it as fair that in one area a company can charge it customers more just because it keeps it's infrastructure in a better condition. The customer is gaining nothing from this, except maybe avoiding a hosepipe ban. That isn't how investment works. Produce a business case and money can be raised
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 20 Aug 22 9.07am | |
---|---|
Never mind the customers. Think of the poor shareholders.
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.