Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

No he isn’t and whether you agree with many of his opinions or not no one could say he’s not consistent and certainly isn’t agenda driven. I doubt he’d be remotely interested in your sense of moral superiority.
Beer and chips? How frightfully working class; the sort of common oiks who only hold those imputed views because they’re incapable of understanding what’s good for them.

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Oh and it leads to the Police cars being painted to support sexual political ideologies.....which is a nonsense for a service which should only be concerned with reducing crime.

It's misplaced empathy over common sense.

Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Aug 2021 11.13am)

Originally posted by eagleman13

"Possessive case: Sara's dog bit the NEIGHBOUR."

If you're going to dig someone out about grammatical errors, at least get your own correct first.

Edited by eagleman13 (24 Aug 2021 12.24pm)

Originally posted by Stirlingsays
There's a general reluctance to pushback against these ideologies, as people are in part scared in case of saying something that would lose them their job or feel that if they point out these problems that they are saying that all gays are bad people or something like that. But none of that is true, and we need to see what the actual practical affects of not pushing back actually does. I agree in general, but not in this instance for two reasons. 1) The police enforced homophobic laws within living memory 2) The police are sending out a message that homophobic crime wont be tolerated. This may be a cheap way to prevent a few crimes

These opinions here are why millions are flowing into these groups. These are politically active ideology pushing groups. Many homosexuals aren't political or don't feel best represented by this. Douglas Murray is a well known example of a socially conservatives homosexual who would fit the latter and indeed has much the same concerns I do.I agree again. I'd go further than this and say that LGB rights are unrelated to Trans right as whilst there is a correlation between sexuality and gender dysmorphia the two aren't linked. Stonewall has run out out LGB issues to campaign for and is now cashing in on a new campaign.

What was this terrible discrimination in 2013? Homosexuality was decriminalised in the 70s. Was legalised in England in 1967, anti-homosexual legislation still existed in other parts of the UK until 2013.

No one sensible in the general public supports violence against homosexuals' let alone nail bomb attacks. Agreed, but no one sensible advocates violence against anyone who hasn't done anything to harm anyone else. Fact is, hate-crime against LGB is frequent, you could still use homophobic slurs now and many wouldn't blink an eyelid. if you used a slur against the BAME community you'd lose your job. That's the promoting of black swan events to justify the forcing of alphabet ideologies onto the majority.

These political ideologies lead to men in skirts being accepted into ladies toilets and changing areas.I totally agree that this is not acceptable. Many LGB that its ridiculous that a self identifying trans man can change in the same changing room as women and girls too.

These political ideologies lead to gender reassignment being suggested for children who might be tom boys, or effeminate/gay, going through a phrase or have activist parents.....a complete disaster for a significant number of them.Agree. I disagree with the idea of gender sterotypes, just because a boy is effeminate or a girl is into masculine things doesn't mean they are they were born into the wrong sex, nothing is wrong with them, they've just got different interests to what's typical.

These political ideologies are why primary school children are being encouraged to think about same sex relationships and encouraged to think of them as a healthy option.I would disagree with schools diving into details of same sex relationships at that age. By about 10/11 kids should be told the basics about how babies are made from a biological perspective, no need to elaborate. I don't see much wrong with telling them that some men love men, and some women love women.

There is a difference between acceptance and promotion. It's yet another example of social liberalism worsening social outcomes but ignoring or providing excuses for the metrics. On star bucks coffee rainbows are complete bulls***, they wouldn't use them in stores in Saudi. But disagree in this instance.

The reality is that any increase in same sex relationships drops birth ratesThere's too many people in the world, not necessarily a bad thing, increases promiscuity in malesMales are always promiscuous, but I that by alienating young gay men it can leave them in a vulnerable to the less disable aspects of the gay community (drugs, dodgy apps etc), we need need to support the best way of guiding young men away from that underworld is by winning their trust, lessens social cohesion and leads to an increase in several violence metrics later in life.

I won't even refer to another sexual activity that damages/destroys the young that only ever finds any support from activists on the far left....among whom many support these political idealogies.

Oh and it leads to the Police cars being painted to support sexual political ideologies.....which is a nonsense for a service which should only be concerned with reducing crime. By showing support for the gay community, it might reduce crime against the gay community by making people think twice before they do it

It's misplaced empathy over common sense.
Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Aug 2021 11.13am)