You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > US Supreme Court Ginsburg kicks the bucket
November 21 2024 11.36pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

US Supreme Court Ginsburg kicks the bucket

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

  

PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 20 Sep 20 4.55pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Go spread your hate and bad grammar elsewhere.

I'm the proud father of two children and I've been with their mother for twenty years.

Shows just how much you know doesn't it.

Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Sep 2020 12.17am)

well spotted on his crappy grammar Mr Sterling me auld drum-banger.

it should say....

Iolar Na h-Eireann ( the eagle of ireland or the irish eagle ). Which uses the grammatical form known as An Tuiseal Gineadach.

[Link]

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
W12 20 Sep 20 8.11pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

No, I don't and I never have.

I vote in what I believe to be the national interest.

That's what every responsible citizen does and, as your question indicates you don't, your own selfishness is laid bare.

Do you belief Somalis,pakistanis and Congolese (as a typical London sample) vote in the same national interest? If so, which nations interest do you think they are voting for?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 20 Sep 20 11.18pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by W12

Do you belief Somalis,pakistanis and Congolese (as a typical London sample) vote in the same national interest? If so, which nations interest do you think they are voting for?

Anyone, whatever their country of birth, who hold British citizenship are irresponsible if when they vote in a UK GE they don't put the British national interest first. Those who acquire citizenship are required to sware allegiance to Queen and country before it is granted. Non citizens, with limited exceptions, cannot vote.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 20 Sep 20 11.49pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Anyone, whatever their country of birth, who hold British citizenship are irresponsible if when they vote in a UK GE they don't put the British national interest first. Those who acquire citizenship are required to sware allegiance to Queen and country before it is granted. Non citizens, with limited exceptions, cannot vote.

so what about half of Ulster and a ton of Scots then ?

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 21 Sep 20 8.55am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Anyone, whatever their country of birth, who hold British citizenship are irresponsible if when they vote in a UK GE they don't put the British national interest first. Those who acquire citizenship are required to sware allegiance to Queen and country before it is granted. Non citizens, with limited exceptions, cannot vote.

So a middle class voter wants lower taxes he is a selfish bar steward but a non worker on benefits who votes Corbyn is doing it for the good of the country.


It's impossible to say why a person votes a particular way you would need to look into their heart. I think most people vote for their own priorities if your a mum education and health care. If you're a pensioner you want to keep the triple lock and so on. I don't consider it to be selfish more nuance.

All of the major parties have fairly moderate policies even Labour will say they would welcome tax cuts if the country could afford it but the priority is health, education etc.

Can you tell me that someone not working and on benefits votes Labour because they believe it is for the benefit of the country and not for their own selfish reasons?

Edited by Badger11 (21 Sep 2020 8.55am)

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 21 Sep 20 10.56am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

So a middle class voter wants lower taxes he is a selfish bar steward but a non worker on benefits who votes Corbyn is doing it for the good of the country.


It's impossible to say why a person votes a particular way you would need to look into their heart. I think most people vote for their own priorities if your a mum education and health care. If you're a pensioner you want to keep the triple lock and so on. I don't consider it to be selfish more nuance.

All of the major parties have fairly moderate policies even Labour will say they would welcome tax cuts if the country could afford it but the priority is health, education etc.

Can you tell me that someone not working and on benefits votes Labour because they believe it is for the benefit of the country and not for their own selfish reasons?

Edited by Badger11 (21 Sep 2020 8.55am)

The original accusation was about how I vote and I responded to say, quite truthfully, that I always think of the national interest which is what I believe we all must do.

That many don't, from both sides of the political divide, is indisputable, but that doesn't mean it is responsible behaviour.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 21 Sep 20 1.15pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

The original accusation was about how I vote and I responded to say, quite truthfully, that I always think of the national interest which is what I believe we all must do.

That many don't, from both sides of the political divide, is indisputable, but that doesn't mean it is responsible behaviour.


I didnt accuse you I asked you a question!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 22 Sep 20 11.02am Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend


checkout the picture of the pretty woman

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 22 Sep 20 11.35am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio


checkout the picture of the pretty woman

I enjoyed the video clip below that the morning shows have ignored of Democrats in 2016 demanding Trump fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court quickly as it is not democratic to leave it open. Hmmmm

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Eaglecoops Flag CR3 22 Sep 20 1.16pm Send a Private Message to Eaglecoops Add Eaglecoops as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

So a middle class voter wants lower taxes he is a selfish bar steward but a non worker on benefits who votes Corbyn is doing it for the good of the country.


It's impossible to say why a person votes a particular way you would need to look into their heart. I think most people vote for their own priorities if your a mum education and health care. If you're a pensioner you want to keep the triple lock and so on. I don't consider it to be selfish more nuance.

All of the major parties have fairly moderate policies even Labour will say they would welcome tax cuts if the country could afford it but the priority is health, education etc.

Can you tell me that someone not working and on benefits votes Labour because they believe it is for the benefit of the country and not for their own selfish reasons?

Edited by Badger11 (21 Sep 2020 8.55am)

My take on this country. You are born wanting to put the world to rights and have a tendency to lean to the left. It doesn't take long to realise that the only way you are going to see much of your hard earned money is to lean to the right. It really is an easy decision. Anyone who doesn't vote with themselves in mind is a fool, or has so much money that it doesn't matter either way. It's easy to be a philanthropist though if you have millions, just ask Abromovich's Jewish mates.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 22 Sep 20 4.59pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

My take on this country. You are born wanting to put the world to rights and have a tendency to lean to the left. It doesn't take long to realise that the only way you are going to see much of your hard earned money is to lean to the right. It really is an easy decision. Anyone who doesn't vote with themselves in mind is a fool, or has so much money that it doesn't matter either way. It's easy to be a philanthropist though if you have millions, just ask Abromovich's Jewish mates.

I dont think it's so much of not seeing much of your hard earnt dosh. It's about where that bit you dont see goes and gets used for. I've got no problem if it goes to a useful cause. I know some has to go to the feckless etc but under labour it's a load of it for votes. I also have an issue about state services pleading poverty 24/7, then wasting so much on s***e and filling up offices with management and bins with perfectly usable equipment and associated stuff.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 22 Sep 20 5.01pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

I will put the caveat that it is a bit HMG inflicted with the way budgets are calculated.
It should be the other way of rewards for saving money not penalizing for not spending it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 4 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > US Supreme Court Ginsburg kicks the bucket