I've already answered this, plus given you the example of a sacked professor.

I'm gone through this all before, all your examples and papers push are deconstructions on categories. It''s all done for a sociological and political agenda.

Let's take a quote from one of your links as evidence. 'While we argue phasing out racial terminology in the biological sciences, we also acknowledge that using race as a political or social category to study racism, although filled with lots of challenges, remains necessary given our need to understand how structural inequities and discrimination produce health disparities between groups,'

Before the far left took over academia this BS didn't exist.....and it isn't supported in China or anywhere else outside modern western academia

Outside of western far left institutions this worldview on race as a social construct and social division doesn't exist.

It's such BS....We have sickle cell, we have black success in sprints and long distance running events. We have IQ scores going back god knows how long...crime and murder rates from all over the world......feck you can send a dna sample away to a commercial company and they can tell you where your genes are from.....'race is a social division' is Marxism BS.

By the way, I've informed that Murray's website contains rebuttals to all the criticisms of his work.

Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Feb 2020 12.07pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Human beings have 46 chromosomes, comprised of billions of corresponding genes which work in tandem with each other to produce internal and external characteristics.

There is no one gene which defines anything; rather, a complex relationship between several genes can alter the level of things such as melanin levels in a person's skin cells, probability of them developing particular types of illness, or the size of bone structures, the flow of hormones from glands to the brain etc.

Scientists, the people who discovered the genome sequence, the people who created electron microscopes to see in to individual cells and the people who now are working on ways of engineering DNA to alter the characteristics of living organisms. Those people are saying that there is no evidence that a 'black' person's genetic make up is substantially different to a 'white' persons, any more so than mine is to yours.

It isn't a conspiracy. It is just that science has found more evidence that disputes your prejudices, and you can't accept it. And that is true of peer-reviewed science in China, India, Europe or Africa.

If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4

So you believe that all behaviour in all animals is down to nurture? That is what you are effectively saying.
Do you think scientists would have the balls to publish any finding that went against the current zeitgeist?

No. Genes obviously play a role.
If they had good evidence yes.

If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4

Well I can't find any Chinese university that's published a paper that supports your Marxist view of 'race' as a construct.

As for evidence for race, I'll repeat a paragraph I've already written.

We have sickle cell, physical size averages, we have black success in sprints and long distance running events. We have IQ scores going back god knows how long...crime and murder rates from all over the world......feck you can send a dna sample away to a commercial company and they can tell you where your genes are from.....'race is a social division' is Marxism BS.

Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Feb 2020 12.52pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

I find it bizarre that you think that's 'monstrous'. As Hrolf said, this isn't a 'blame' game.

Anyway we are going around the houses.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)