This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Rudi Hedman Caterham 09 Jan 20 11.27am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Indeed. If you take the Queen's coin....which is really our coin...but I digress. When you take the coin you should do the job. Progressive Royalty is an oxymoron.....I blame Diana as well.....Entitled spoilt women wreck families just as much as anti social overly stubborn men. Edited by Stirlingsays (09 Jan 2020 10.26am) But Charles was having a long term affair and she was quite trapped. But then she shouldn’t have married him in the first place but had no career or even O level so no doubt a reason why she did. But in the end she could have stayed out of the spotlight a lot more once she split from Charles. Absolutely no public engagements and eventually the press interest would go.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 09 Jan 20 11.43am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
But Charles was having a long term affair and she was quite trapped. But then she shouldn’t have married him in the first place but had no career or even O level so no doubt a reason why she did. But in the end she could have stayed out of the spotlight a lot more once she split from Charles. Absolutely no public engagements and eventually the press interest would go. She was physically gorgeous and it's very apparent why he married her.....but mentally a needy unstable fruitcake. She wasn't the kind of women you need in Royalty.....Kate obviously is built from that stock. If a family doesn't have a stable reliable woman at its centre, they are truly fecked. Edited by Stirlingsays (09 Jan 2020 11.43am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 09 Jan 20 12.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
She was physically gorgeous and it's very apparent why he married her.....but mentally a needy unstable fruitcake. She wasn't the kind of women you need in Royalty.....Kate obviously is built from that stock. If a family doesn't have a stable reliable woman at its centre, they are truly fecked. Edited by Stirlingsays (09 Jan 2020 11.43am) I never shared the same opinion. Kate I do see, but her being conscious of every word isn’t a turn on, and turning into a wire coat hanger immediately after the wedding isn’t either.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 09 Jan 20 1.52pm | |
---|---|
Once the gloss has come off of lunching with Jay Z & Beyonce. They'll soon be back. If you think the paparazzi is bad in the UK? Wait until the US media get onto them.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 09 Jan 20 1.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
I never shared the same opinion. Kate I do see, but her being conscious of every word isn’t a turn on, and turning into a wire coat hanger immediately after the wedding isn’t either. Fair comment.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 09 Jan 20 2.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Once the gloss has come off of lunching with Jay Z & Beyonce. They'll soon be back. If you think the paparazzi is bad in the UK? Wait until the US media get onto them. Well she's like a Kardashian wannbe so I suspect that it'll be more an unpleasant lesson for the numpty Harry than for her.....what Meghan wants, Meghan gets, as one media commentator put it. I'm just glad we are seeing less of them......Frigging papers were like Diana and Charles all over again. Edited by Stirlingsays (09 Jan 2020 2.12pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
martin2412 Living The Dream 09 Jan 20 2.24pm | |
---|---|
I just wonder how long it will be before she has her tragic skiing accident or something similar.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 09 Jan 20 2.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Once the gloss has come off of lunching with Jay Z & Beyonce. They'll soon be back. If you think the paparazzi is bad in the UK? Wait until the US media get onto them. Telephoto bender
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 09 Jan 20 5.56pm | |
---|---|
They say they want 'financial independence' yet they have sought and have been granted a trademark by the UK's Intellectual Property Office for their brand 'Sussex Royal'. Fecking embarrassing and degrading to profit off links to the Royal Family. This was not what he was born for.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 09 Jan 20 6.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
They say they want 'financial independence' yet they have sought and have been granted a trademark by the UK's Intellectual Property Office for their brand 'Sussex Royal'. Fecking embarrassing and degrading to profit off links to the Royal Family. This was not what he was born for. Time to ditch the Titles then.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 09 Jan 20 6.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chris123
Time to ditch the Titles then. Agreed.....with this kind of thing they should be removed. Though he's the spare so....
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
thegreatlardino crawley/selsey 09 Jan 20 6.19pm | |
---|---|
the french had the best idea
Sometimes I set out for Ludlow |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.