I thought something like that would be your response but it would have to be a fraud of massive proportions including some prominent English historians to revise that history but anyway it doesn't mean enough to me to change your view.
One thing I will say to you and the previous poster it's a bit disrespectful to take the p*ss out of a genuine post when you could do a little bit of research to try to disprove the link I posted. Any way I'll l leave you to it.

We did have a Black Prince

Red and Blue Army!

Quite.

That said why should things not be put into pre cultural oppression context. Olivier played othello and other roles in black face. Christopher Lee and Edward G Robinson and (laughably) John Wayne yellowed up for roles. Then it was called acting and no one batted an eyelid. It smacks of latter day witch hunt that a person - and they are always caucasian males - will be hauled over for touching a woman's knee once decades ago or dressing as a minstrel once when they were 11. Rape murder you understand why society wont let them off the hook just because time has passed. But this sort of trivial zeitgeist tosh?

Hammer. Nail. Head.

We’ve created a whole film whereby two black people dress up as ‘white chicks’ for entertainment purposes. Nothing was said.

Well I guess you could debate the relevance of most individuals in British history at least the ones you know about, but how much do you actually know about Black British history (I use that term for convenience as for me there is only history not white not black just history)