This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
spartakev2 Anerley 27 Aug 18 7.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ARGILE OLD GEEZER
I was just about to post a very similar response, its looking like a LETS BLAME R.H.thread coz we lost an away game,no mention of the bad luck and ref decisions that went against us. its all roy's fault we have 3 similar strikers, one is off form, one injured still,and one very raw, we also have another option for a striker,but he is not fit yet. Don't be childish. Of course it wasn't RH fault we lost. But you can't blame fans for questioning why he doesn't use his subs when things aren't going well.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ARGILE OLD GEEZER PORTIMAO 27 Aug 18 7.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Frickin Saweet
Before the match Roy said ayew, kouyate and Meyer all fit and ready to play a part, which makes even less sense to leave them out, Meyer excluded but that was too late to win the match. Look.what he did in the he short time he was on Meyer did look good when he came on for a SHORT TIME. i believe it was a SHORT time coz he hasn't trained for months.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
FairweatherEagle London 27 Aug 18 7.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by spartakev2
Don't be childish. Of course it wasn't RH fault we lost. But you can't blame fans for questioning why he doesn't use his subs when things aren't going well. Agreed - it would be pretty boring if every post was "oh well - in Roy we trust". A forum is intended for discussion and debate, although all too often many posts come off as needlessly abrasive, a lot of the time, people are just bewildered and there's nothing wrong with expressing that.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ARGILE OLD GEEZER PORTIMAO 27 Aug 18 7.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Brinscall Eagle
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Casual Orpington 27 Aug 18 8.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ARGILE OLD GEEZER
Murphy wasn’t slagging Roy off, he loves him thinks he’s a great manager , was just explaining how he manages.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Booted Eagle Bristol 27 Aug 18 8.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ARGILE OLD GEEZER
Roy was his manager for 3 years or so at Fulham so he probably knows a thing about his tactics.
“ [T]here are known knowns; there are things we know that we know.There are known unknowns; that is to say there are things that, we now know we don't know.But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don't know. ” |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ARGILE OLD GEEZER PORTIMAO 28 Aug 18 7.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Booted Eagle
Roy was his manager for 3 years or so at Fulham so he probably knows a thing about his tactics. I know he was, but it was still a criticism of Roys (subs) tactics.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
laddo london 28 Aug 18 7.58am | |
---|---|
I know what you're saying but Joel puts that one away we all say Roy was spot on. Fine margins and all that.
laddo "People say, live fast, die young. I say live fast, die old. That's me, the non-conformist". |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Frickin Saweet South Cronx 28 Aug 18 11.20am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ARGILE OLD GEEZER
I was just about to post a very similar response, its looking like a LETS BLAME R.H.thread coz we lost an away game,no mention of the bad luck and ref decisions that went against us. its all roy's fault we have 3 similar strikers, one is off form, one injured still,and one very raw, we also have another option for a striker,but he is not fit yet. yours and the other poster names you mention are really over the top reactions to what is obviously a common observation made by a lot of fans, pundits and journalists - i.e. that we needed to make changes to influence the game using the players that Roy had declared ready and fit before the match. This is not blame or any sort of attack on the manager - just a bleeding obvious conclusion to what was playing out on the pitch and we've all watched enough matches to see it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 28 Aug 18 11.26am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Frickin Saweet
yours and the other poster names you mention are really over the top reactions to what is obviously a common observation made by a lot of fans, pundits and journalists - i.e. that we needed to make changes to influence the game using the players that Roy had declared ready and fit before the match. This is not blame or any sort of attack on the manager - just a bleeding obvious conclusion to what was playing out on the pitch and we've all watched enough matches to see it. If the conclusion is indeed as obvious as so many seem to think, then why didn't Hodgson do it?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 28 Aug 18 11.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
If the conclusion is indeed as obvious as so many seem to think, then why didn't Hodgson do it? I sometimes feel these kind of managers give the players on the pitch a chance to keep their place or completely lose it so they have no complaints, grumblings or negative influence in the squad. In a shortish space of time you get the strongest 11 on the pitch selected from a few over 11 players and those unfavoured have very little to complain about, at the cost of a few short term points over a longer term benefit and harmony. Just a theory, whether obvious or not, or so obvious it’s never mentioned. Edited by Rudi Hedman (28 Aug 2018 11.51am)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Frickin Saweet South Cronx 28 Aug 18 1.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
If the conclusion is indeed as obvious as so many seem to think, then why didn't Hodgson do it? well that's one that only him and perhaps a few people close to him can answer. Danny Murphy gave this thoughts about Roy having his 'winning 11' training together all week for the game ahead making him reluctant to change his formula during a game. Hodgson has said previously that whatever comes off the bench needs to be better than what is already on the pitch. I disagree with that last point to a degree as it's not always about who is best on paper but what is working and I'm of the opinion that if something isn't working then you change it. The best-laid plans of mice and men often go awry, no matter how carefully a project is planned. At those times action is required IMO. Don't get me wrong I'm very happy he's at Palace and his approach has more positive than negative outcomes, but perhaps this is why Roy is managing at our level club and not Liverpool/England level, the missing ability to have an effective plan B when things aren't going to plan A. Edited by Frickin Saweet (28 Aug 2018 2.01pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.