His point was probably more to do with the effectiveness of the barrier than the model of car hitting it.

Only an imbecile would try to ram a reinforced steel barrier especially during August when Parliament is relatively empty.

Probably was, but it still isn't a Focus.

Poland and Hungary sent troops to all of these wars.

No terrorist attacks......hmmmm...really difficult one that.

They also don't get lefties making excuses nor anyone telling them that their lack of diversity is some terrible problem for their cultural enjoyment.

I highly recommend that they are the other eastern European countries continue giving the EU the middle finger.

This line of attack doesn't hold water.

They're not the main protagonists. If you're planning a terrorist attack in Europe, if you've got half a brain you'll be aiming to target the highest profile, most committed and involved country possible. As the group leader, America is tricky, so its close ally the UK will do nicely thank you very much.

There have also been terrorist attacks in other countries besides the UK, such as France, Spain and Belgium which has had a significant number of recent attacks. It's worth pointing out that Belgium committed far less troops to the 'War on terror' and 'Operation Enduring Freedom' than Poland, which was also one of the leading contributors to the NATO force in Afghanistan, and only marginally more than Hungary.

Has this point been trotted out to tee up a reply (in regard to perceived anti-muslim refugee laws in Poland, ergo supporting the constant anti-immigration arguments on here) if so the basis for it being made is in fact incorrect. Poland accepts muslim immigrants and refugees, it does not accept relocation refugees from other countries.

Poland also has far less of a history with the Middle East, colonialism and empire building.

Ice bath for one!

It's clearly obvious that I meant recent history. It's also clear that debating the issue is a far better use of ones intellect. Apologies for not stating the obvious and reminding you of the context of this thread?

No part of my response is in any way related to sympathising with terrorists. It's providing a counter point to a factually incorrect argument.

Also, note the use of the words 'far less history', as opposed to 'no history'. Jeez