This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Lyons550 Shirley 24 May 18 1.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by europalace
"it would require rises of 3p in the pound on each of income tax, VAT and National Insurance by 2033." Sadly that's an incredibly simplistic view..the system needs to be reformed at the same time...cutting much of the waste, resulting in a potential net increase in tax of 1p in the pound. That money should also be ringfenced for certain things, such as nurses and preventative care...not just for consultants; agency staff; over inflated drug prices and another layer of middle management.
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lyons550 Shirley 24 May 18 1.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by serial thriller
Although there are 120 thousand non-British citizens working in the NHS... The people 'contributing next to nothing' are the elderly, whose number is also going up year on year and who are in most need of medical support and social care. How are we supposed to solve that crisis without turning to migration?
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 24 May 18 1.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
BT etc have to plug their pension deficits by cutting jobs, wages, benefits etc of current staff not the ones who creamed it off the top for years and are now retired. Wow. You are a very bitter man
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lyons550 Shirley 24 May 18 1.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by aquickgame2
They ( the different governments ) took out as much as they wanted during my working life,I had no choice as to what they wanted,where they allocated it. Now its my time to take as much as I can out of it..selfish,you bet I am. I've argued for a few years on here about 'choosing' where a portion of our taxes go to. The usual, defence, NHS, Judical system and Education would be ringfenced in my ideal world...with the remaining 20% of someones tax burden going to up to 4 different areas. These areas could all 'tout' for my support accordingly.
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 24 May 18 1.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by serial thriller
The people 'contributing next to nothing' are the elderly, whose number is also going up year on year and who are in most need of medical support and social care. How are we supposed to solve that crisis without turning to migration? There are other ways to contribute apart from paying tax and most pensioners contribute to the economy by spending. This particular pensioner is still working and paying high levels of both Corporation and Income Tax and tends to spend quite a lot too
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lyons550 Shirley 24 May 18 1.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
The simplest way of funding the increase necessary for the NHS to function is simply to scrap brexit.
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 24 May 18 1.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lyons550
A soggy fart, more like
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 24 May 18 1.23pm | |
---|---|
I think you will find the changing demographics of the country would make a far bigger impact on the costs for a single year than the whole total for any (disputed or unsubstantiated) migrant cost.
2 It undertakes unneccesary operations and services, like fertility, and some plastic surgery. 3 It conflates public and private services with teh easier and more profitable services being cherry picked and done by the same individual but for profit outside the NHS. 4 It has no written scope to describe the boundaries of what is avaialble. For example should all citizens of the UK be able to access drugs that cost 40K a month but merely delay death by a few months. 5 Better but more costly surgical procedures etc, saving those which would have died. 5 Post surgery or hospital care, and bed blocking. 6 The dicotomy that it campaigns to increase overall health of the nation costing money, whilst having to deal with more chronic disease related to old age like diabetes, heart conditions or senility; which costs massive amounts of money. 7 Containg supervirus caused by poor drug prescribing, hospital cleaniness etc. Society needs to decide what it wants and what it is willing to pay for before doing the costings. Costings should be a constraint and not the allowed run up Tsunami-like. Perhaps we would be better to relax regulations on smoking drinking etc; perhaps the elderly pay more tax. We need to make decisions first rather than chuck money at a public monolith which many see as so sacred it can not be questioned. Anyway enough about the NHS lets get back to debating sending the Windrush generation home because they now cost too much.
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 24 May 18 1.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by serial thriller
Where are the ghettos? Tower Hamlets or Stoke on Trent? Or is it Londonderry, where levels of poverty exceed the previous two even though most immigrants are Irish? There is a big difference between us and Japan which is that in most of the cases of migration in to our country, migrants are coming from areas where we have extended our political authority. In the case of Commonwealth migrants, that means that many of them are actually citizens, coming from countries like Jamaica where they were British subjects before we even took Ireland. In the more modern case of the EU, we were one of the earlier entrants who aggressively pushed for the inclusion of Eastern European and Baltic states. This allowed our banks to push tarriff free loans on them (and allowed us to fly for peanuts and get pissed in Krakow, Split etc). Then when their citizens took advantage of free movement the other way, we took their cheap trade but routinely demonized them using some of the oldest cultural stereotypes in the book. Unless Britain takes some responsibility for our actions abroad we will be condemned to repeat history over and over again. And as im sure you could more eloquently summarise than me, it is the poor on both sides that suffer. **Correction**
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 24 May 18 1.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by pefwin
Anyway enough about the NHS lets get back to debating sending the Windrush generation home because they now cost too much. Nope, a country doesn't renege upon those who have been here for decades, even though it was a mistake to provide citizenship to them originally. They should have been here on a 'foreign worker' basis. This country needs to stop running an immigration ponzi scheme on the British tax payer. Our relaxed attitude to immigration has given us a larger problem in regardless to pensioners. The idea that has been suggested that we can only just carry on importing more and more young foreigners here is an incoherent and illogical argument. The 'no borders' left who want the minority votes and those sections of the economic right who want cheap labour have selfishly buggered up this country. The economic right keep quiet while the left just lie and deny. The answer is in automation and in having guest 'foreign workers' not giving citizenship rights to people to bring in their dependents. Edited by Stirlingsays (24 May 2018 1.32pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 24 May 18 1.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Nope, a country doesn't renege upon those who have been here for decades, even though it was a mistake to provide citizenship to them originally. They should have been here on a 'foreign worker' basis. This country needs to stop running an immigration ponzi scheme on the British tax payer. Our relaxed attitude to immigration has given us a larger problem in regardless to pensioners. The idea that has been suggested that we can only just carry on importing more and more young foreigners here is an incoherent and illogical argument. The 'no borders' left who want the minority votes and those sections of the economic right who want cheap labour have selfishly buggered up this country. The economic right keep quiet while the left just lie and deny. The answer is in automation and in having guest 'foreign workers' not giving citizenship rights to people to bring in their dependents. Edited by Stirlingsays (24 May 2018 1.32pm)
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 24 May 18 1.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by pefwin
You do realise this a thread about the NHS, you should start a fresh one on immigration. I start enough threads as it is, how about you start one. No offence meant but the only person I really listen to about evolving threads is the OP as it's their thread. Most long threads take twists and turns.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.