You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > What price for Zaha would be too tempting?
November 24 2024 8.10am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

What price for Zaha would be too tempting?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 12 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

  

Brentmiester_General Flag Front line in the battle against t... 20 May 18 3.58pm

So bored of all this already.

 


"We love you Palace, we f@cking hate Man U, We love you Palace, we hate the brighton too, We love you Palace we play in red 'n' blue, so f@ck you, and you ...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
pssguy Flag 20 May 18 4.27pm Send a Private Message to pssguy Add pssguy as a friend

Originally posted by Brentmiester_General

So bored of all this already.

Just as well you are not on the board then

Hodgson is pushing hard for some new players to come in early. That will be tough and cost.

What's he going to do if it doesn't happen. He could walk and it wouldn't affect any future job prospects he has. His reputation has been restored at least for other than elite clubs - though he would probably have done a good job for Arsenal

Obviously the TV money may be enough, but with the new stand there may be pressure to sell an asset. I'm sure Benteke would be first choice if there are any takers but there has been little talk about any one else - though Luka might get some interest if he has a good WC

I'm guessing the board are hoping Villa win next week and decide thay need Benteke back. That would also make Fulham players more likely to be available


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
twist Flag Miami, Florida 20 May 18 4.30pm Send a Private Message to twist Add twist as a friend

EVen if Zaha went and we got 60M, all of a sudden, any player we want, doubles in price. But if someone does ocme knocking with 60M, you think the board will think twice ?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Portuguese Flag Porto 20 May 18 5.01pm Send a Private Message to Portuguese Add Portuguese as a friend

The value of Wilfred for us is much more than the market value. Neverthless anything less than 70M. it's absurd! Let me put it this way if Van Dijk was transfered by 67M. We've got one straight answer...

 


1861 Football Club

FPL

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 20 May 18 5.11pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by pssguy

Just as well you are not on the board then

Hodgson is pushing hard for some new players to come in early. That will be tough and cost.

What's he going to do if it doesn't happen. He could walk and it wouldn't affect any future job prospects he has. His reputation has been restored at least for other than elite clubs - though he would probably have done a good job for Arsenal

Obviously the TV money may be enough, but with the new stand there may be pressure to sell an asset. I'm sure Benteke would be first choice if there are any takers but there has been little talk about any one else - though Luka might get some interest if he has a good WC

I'm guessing the board are hoping Villa win next week for and decide thay need Benteke back. That would also make Fulham players more likely to be available


To put this new stand cost and possible sales of players into perspective the Americans have invested £50 million isn’t it that’s ring fenced for ground development so we’re short by the average summer net transfer fee spend which is most likely going to be financed with business loans rather than making decisions that could jeopardise our prem status.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
bexleydave Flag Barnehurst 20 May 18 5.11pm Send a Private Message to bexleydave Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add bexleydave as a friend

Originally posted by pssguy

Just as well you are not on the board then

Hodgson is pushing hard for some new players to come in early. That will be tough and cost.

What's he going to do if it doesn't happen. He could walk and it wouldn't affect any future job prospects he has. His reputation has been restored at least for other than elite clubs - though he would probably have done a good job for Arsenal

Obviously the TV money may be enough, but with the new stand there may be pressure to sell an asset. I'm sure Benteke would be first choice if there are any takers but there has been little talk about any one else - though Luka might get some interest if he has a good WC

I'm guessing the board are hoping Villa win next week and decide thay need Benteke back. That would also make Fulham players more likely to be available


IF that were the case, then we shouldn't be building such an expensive new stand. As the injuries this season showed, our squad is paper thin and the money from any player sales needs to be used to improve the squad, not the infrastructure. As I've understood the project, the owners are funding the building works as our income will be increased when they're completed.

 


Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pssguy Flag 20 May 18 5.16pm Send a Private Message to pssguy Add pssguy as a friend

Originally posted by bexleydave


IF that were the case, then we shouldn't be building such an expensive new stand. As the injuries this season showed, our squad is paper thin and the money from any player sales needs to be used to improve the squad, not the infrastructure. As I've understood the project, the owners are funding the building works as our income will be increased when they're completed.

Thanks for info. I was going more by the Arsenal experience where Wenger was limited on cash whilst the Emirates was under construction. I guess the finances were not structured like ours

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 20 May 18 5.41pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by pssguy

Thanks for info. I was going more by the Arsenal experience where Wenger was limited on cash whilst the Emirates was under construction. I guess the finances were not structured like ours

That was one huge stadium all in one go. This is one stand.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
taylors lovechild Flag 20 May 18 6.16pm Send a Private Message to taylors lovechild Add taylors lovechild as a friend

Everton.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Evert....hahahahahahahahahaha.

No amount of money would be a good deal. If we had a terrible squad you could maybe see an argument for generating funds to build a team, but we don't need any serious adjustments and we would be incredibly lucky to replace him with someone half as good.

If (and it's a big if) Wilf decides he wants to leave it will only be to a club challenging for trophies. Why go back to the northwest to finish perhaps one or two places higher than Palace for (maybe) a few pennies more? Never going to happen. In England I can only see Man City being willing to pay the size of fee and wages it would take to drag him away, and even then I imagine Parish will have him in a fingercuff.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 20 May 18 6.24pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

That was one huge stadium all in one go. This is one stand.

The Emirates Stadium cost £390 Million.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Plaistow Eagle Flag 20 May 18 6.56pm Send a Private Message to Plaistow Eagle Add Plaistow Eagle as a friend

Look it's this simple if Wilf leaves will only to be a top 6 club - so a club that can offer something we can't currently - European football, Domestic trophies and the top table....!!

Everton link is laughable - they don't have the money or Gravitis - beyond that don't even have a manager - lazy end of season journalism - nothing in it..!!

So that leaves the top 6;

City don't need him - anyway looks like Mahrez is in their sights so forget it.
Man U - no way - been there done it - Mouriniho a nightmare - they ain't going no further forward all the time he is at the helm.
Liverpool - don't need him, even if they did come in if the they win the Champions League - would only be a benchwarmer - just can't see it..!!
Spurs - couldn't afford him with their new stadium to be paid for.
Arsenal - no Manager - prices being quoted seems to rule them out.
Chelsea - as I have said previously, possibly keeps Wilf in London - this would all depend on what happens with Hazard - if he goes to Real - then this becomes a real possibility. Depends what happens with Conte.

Meantime Wilf has said no plans/desire to leave, loving being at Palace and only a year into a 5 year deal.

Given all that - think we'll see Wilf in Red and Blue for at least another season yet..!!

COYP

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Painter Flag Croydon 20 May 18 7.04pm Send a Private Message to Painter Add Painter as a friend

Originally posted by bexleydave


IF that were the case, then we shouldn't be building such an expensive new stand. As the injuries this season showed, our squad is paper thin and the money from any player sales needs to be used to improve the squad, not the infrastructure. As I've understood the project, the owners are funding the building works as our income will be increased when they're completed.

If our squad is paper thin and we had the worst run of injuries this season than in memory, how do you account for the fact we finished 11th?
You could say Hodgson did a brilliant job, but he could only work with players available in the squad, therefore our squad is good enough. That doesn't mean it cannot be improved, but its not paper thin, as people like to quote.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 4 of 12 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > What price for Zaha would be too tempting?