Did you hear about the little Jewish boy who lost his pullover?

Inmate: what you in for?
Dankula: my pug is a nazi

The mountains are calling & I must go.

It was this poor little soul who deleted your insulting post but I won't do it again as next time you insult a large proportion of this forum's members it will be a red card.

Firstly he hasn't been sentenced yet and I haven't said he should be imprisoned.
Secondly, I don't like Frankie Boyle or the sex psitols the point of mentioning them is that at some points offence can be justitified for creativity.
I am not free to say and do what ever I like, I am not free to go to the Whitgift centre and shout obsecnities at the top of my voice, my local pub wouldn't be able to put hardcore p*** on the big screen over Sunday lunch time however much it might increase turnover. There are laws governing what we can and can't do which are generally social agreed but in some case enshrined in law.
I would defend Ken Livingstones right to say Hitler was a Zionist, I would defend the right of James McLean not to wear a poppy, I would defend the right of David Irving to deny the holocaust or Omar Bakri's right to call for Shari law. Personally, I would like to see these views discussed openly and on tv and the evidence they are based on tested. I consider it far better for them to be fully debated in public view then stuck away in places where it gains credibility and never fully appraised.
I won't defend the right of James McClean to go Warrington or Einniskillen shouting up the 'RA, I would not defend the right of David Irving to go to a Synagogue and wearing a comedy Hitler costume . The point that these are catergorical different to reasoned debate seems an obvious one. Count Dankula falls in the latter catergory rather than reasoned debate and dialogue.

One supporter of hacking argued that without it "you will do away with the courage and pluck of the game, and I will be bound to bring over a lot of Frenchmen who would beat you with a week's practice -Blackheath secretary at first meeting of the F.A

I seem to recall a Jewish joke that was a bit insulting a year ago and quite a few Jewish members were up in arms over it

We now seem to be talking about two separate things as we were originally talking about the dog and now it's whether or not we should allow rather insulting comments about Jewish people on this forum.

My personal take on the latter is that we shouldn't allow any comments from someone that they wouldn't make to a group of people in the pub that they didn't know.