It addresses his allies' expression of utter contempt for the working class they supposedly stand for? My mistake.

Please summarise. Who ultimately was responsible for the demonisation of the working class? Surely by the time it was written, it was only those left behind by Blair's efforts who still fell in to the category and were subsequently deemed inferior by an additional strata of society absorbed in to education and the public sector.

As I said it's what you bring to the table
If a plumber comes and fixes your boiler at 3am and it's -10c you would pay him the £200 quid
If he comes in the summer at 3pm and it's 20c you would begrudge £200 so he doesn't charge that.
Hence a dealer earns his boss 10 m a year he's worth 2 m
If he earns 1 m he get loads less.
Relevant even at base level.
It's what the jobs worth to you at the receiving end.

The mentality of 'what's it worth to you' is unregulated capitalism. It's not best for society at large once the rewards can vastly out strip the work.

For example.....the internet and the web wouldn't likely have even got started with this kind of 'what's it worth to you' mentality. The language needed to connect pages was created and given away for free.

A lot of the current infrastructure all of us use in life wasn't created by us and we use it.....with a 'what's it worth' mentality......well, we would see far more toll gates on roads for example.

Unregulated capitalism eats itself, just as communism does.

Edited by Stirlingsays (22 Dec 2017 7.30pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Ok let's twist that one a bit. If a privately-educated RP-spoken fella from a well to do background, whose relatives and descendants were of the professional class, as are all his friends, but he himself had been employed as a £15,000 a year waiter for the last five years; does that stop him being the ultra middle class lad which his background and environment dictates that he is?

I think not.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Whilst i agree, the fact is that if that business is free to do what it will, with no holds barred, and its goods are not sustainable then it will burn eventually anyhow. Or, looking at the bigger picture, irresponsible, unregulated, aggressive free-market capitalism can only but implode.

I prefer the policies of more enlightened countries who mix it up a bit with a bit of socialism and limits to just how much corporations can monopolise and take without due care.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

The human race, you mean? We are not in this all together. Some have progressed/benefited and some have suffered through the modern capitalist system.

If you scan the globe you will easily find areas that have been aggressively destroyed in the pursuit of profit and the locals who have born the brunt.

Also, you are contradicting yourself. You hate the banks more than anyone but they are the finest example of what you have just promoted.

Edited by Kermit8 (22 Dec 2017 8.53pm)

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]