Ref for west ham

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Ref for west ham

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 4 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Dangermouse Hastings 29 Oct 17 8.58pm
Originally posted by braunstoneagle Originally posted by Dangermouse Bobby the inept t* Madley even told Wilf there was contact, but apparently not enough to warrant a penalty for a full speed Zaha. What a fing joke, on the halfway line the coward gives it 11 times out of 10. There was no more contact on Andros, but by now Madley knew he was an incompetent prick and tried to even things out. As usual you will never have me agreeing with you and your ridiculous defence of the indefensible. Basically the real reason he bottled a big decision is cos he knew Fonte was the last man. zaha fell far to easily dangermouse, i absolutly worship the ground zaha walks on but he does it quite a lot, its not just him, theres losds of players who do it, they try to manipulate set peices/pens by making the most of challenges. unfortunatly refs now are trained to see it. sometimes it works, sometimes it doesnt, thank f** it worked against watford in the play off final. and it didnt matter if fonte was the last man, havnt the rules changed, you cant give a penalty & a red anymore? Edited by braunstoneagle (29 Oct 2017 8.47pm) Edited by braunstoneagle (29 Oct 2017 8.48pm) Complete rubbish. Townsend went down easily under pressure, Wilf was impeded. That's a penalty and as I've said Madley told Wilf there was contact. Sorry inept ref who luckily had the decency to try to make amends, which makes him even worse in my opinion. That's Life And as funny as it may seem Some people get their kicks stompin' on a Dream. KEEP THE FAITH!!!!!
Alert a moderator to this post

Dangermouse

Hastings 29 Oct 17 8.58pm

Originally posted by braunstoneagle

Originally posted by Dangermouse

Bobby the inept t*** Madley even told Wilf there was contact, but apparently not enough to warrant a penalty for a full speed Zaha. What a f***ing joke, on the halfway line the coward gives it 11 times out of 10. There was no more contact on Andros, but by now Madley knew he was an incompetent prick and tried to even things out. As usual you will never have me agreeing with you and your ridiculous defence of the indefensible.
Basically the real reason he bottled a big decision is cos he knew Fonte was the last man.

zaha fell far to easily dangermouse, i absolutly worship the ground zaha walks on but he does it quite a lot, its not just him, theres losds of players who do it, they try to manipulate set peices/pens by making the most of challenges. unfortunatly refs now are trained to see it.

sometimes it works, sometimes it doesnt, thank f*** it worked against watford in the play off final.

and it didnt matter if fonte was the last man, havnt the rules changed, you cant give a penalty & a red anymore?

Edited by braunstoneagle (29 Oct 2017 8.47pm)

Edited by braunstoneagle (29 Oct 2017 8.48pm)

Complete rubbish.
Townsend went down easily under pressure, Wilf was impeded. That's a penalty and as I've said Madley told Wilf there was contact. Sorry inept ref who luckily had the decency to try to make amends, which makes him even worse in my opinion.

That's Life
And as funny as it may seem
Some people get their kicks stompin' on a Dream.
KEEP THE FAITH!!!!!

Alert a moderator to this post

Dangermouse Hastings 29 Oct 17 9.00pm
Originally posted by braunstoneagle you guys sound like warnock blaming the refs for everything No I just blame the ref when he f***s us over. Maybe we should just smile our way into the championship. That's Life And as funny as it may seem Some people get their kicks stompin' on a Dream. KEEP THE FAITH!!!!!
Alert a moderator to this post

Dangermouse

Hastings 29 Oct 17 9.00pm

Originally posted by braunstoneagle

you guys sound like warnock blaming the refs for everything

No I just blame the ref when he f***s us over. Maybe we should just smile our way into the championship.

That's Life
And as funny as it may seem
Some people get their kicks stompin' on a Dream.
KEEP THE FAITH!!!!!

Alert a moderator to this post

braunstoneagle the middle of bumf*** nowhere... 29 Oct 17 9.03pm
Originally posted by Dangermouse No I just blame the ref when he f*s us over. Maybe we should just smile our way into the championship. it only takes 30 seconds for a team to score a goal fella...dont fall into the trap of blaming everybody but ourselves. we wernt fed over, we f ourselves over by being s* quite a lot of the time, not the refs fault, its ours. Edited by braunstoneagle (29 Oct 2017 9.04pm) ‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway
Alert a moderator to this post

braunstoneagle

the middle of bumf*** nowhere... 29 Oct 17 9.03pm

Send a Private Message to braunstoneagle

Originally posted by Dangermouse

No I just blame the ref when he f***s us over. Maybe we should just smile our way into the championship.

it only takes 30 seconds for a team to score a goal fella...dont fall into the trap of blaming everybody but ourselves.

we wernt f***ed over, we f*** ourselves over by being s*** quite a lot of the time, not the refs fault, its ours.

Edited by braunstoneagle (29 Oct 2017 9.04pm)

‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway

Alert a moderator to this post

the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 29 Oct 17 9.51pm
Originally posted by peterg With the sad departure of Mrk Cntenfck, Willo has a new hero in the shape of the wretched Bobby Madley. In the pen incident with Fonte, Wilf tried to jump over Fonte's leg to avoid accusations of diving and being booked, as per Cntenfck in the Watford match last year. Wilf couldn't jump high enough so went down anyway, but Madley didn't give it in on the grounds that it was Wilf who was fouled.* I must admit that I was surprised that Madley gave us the pen in the second half. That too looked marginal but maybe he was evening things up for the Wilf non-pen in the first half. If The foul on Townsend had been on Zaha, Madeley wouldnt have given that penalty either...
Alert a moderator to this post

the silurian

The garden of England.(not really) 29 Oct 17 9.51pm

Originally posted by peterg

With the sad departure of M*rk C*ntenf*ck, Willo has a new hero in the shape of the wretched Bobby Madley. In the pen incident with Fonte, Wilf tried to jump over Fonte's leg to avoid accusations of diving and being booked, as per C*ntenf*ck in the Watford match last year. Wilf couldn't jump high enough so went down anyway, but Madley didn't give it in on the grounds that it was Wilf who was fouled.

I must admit that I was surprised that Madley gave us the pen in the second half. That too looked marginal but maybe he was evening things up for the Wilf non-pen in the first half.

If The foul on Townsend had been on Zaha, Madeley wouldnt have given that penalty either...

Alert a moderator to this post

Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 29 Oct 17 10.48pm
Originally posted by Dangermouse Bobby the inept t* Madley even told Wilf there was contact, but apparently not enough to warrant a penalty for a full speed Zaha. What a f*ing joke, on the halfway line the coward gives it 11 times out of 10. There was no more contact on Andros, but by now Madley knew he was an incompetent prick and tried to even things out. As usual you will never have me agreeing with you and your ridiculous defence of the indefensible. Basically the real reason he bottled a big decision is cos he knew Fonte was the last man. I couldn't disagree more with this diatribe. We will have to agree to disagree. If a penalty had been awarded against us in similar circumstances there would have been strident calls that either it was NOT a penalty or perhaps it was "Soft". And Madley would have come in for vituperation on here. At least I can articulate my viewpoint free from emotive rhetoric and foul language. Edited by Willo (29 Oct 2017 11.00pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

Willo

South coast - west of Brighton. 29 Oct 17 10.48pm

Originally posted by Dangermouse

I couldn't disagree more with this diatribe.
We will have to agree to disagree.

If a penalty had been awarded against us in similar circumstances there would have been strident calls that either it was NOT a penalty or perhaps it was "Soft".
And Madley would have come in for vituperation on here.

At least I can articulate my viewpoint free from emotive rhetoric and foul language.

Edited by Willo (29 Oct 2017 11.00pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

chateauferret 29 Oct 17 11.47pm
Originally posted by Willo I couldn't disagree more with this diatribe. We will have to agree to disagree. If a penalty had been awarded against us in similar circumstances there would have been strident calls that either it was NOT a penalty or perhaps it was "Soft". And Madley would have come in for vituperation on here. At least I can articulate my viewpoint free from emotive rhetoric and foul language. And without facts, as well. ============ The Ferret ============
Alert a moderator to this post

chateauferret

29 Oct 17 11.47pm

Originally posted by Willo

I couldn't disagree more with this diatribe.
We will have to agree to disagree.

And without facts, as well.

============
The Ferret
============

Alert a moderator to this post

MKCPFC Spain/MK 30 Oct 17 12.41am
Originally posted by MKCPFC Willo , out of interest , if you are watching the Leicester v Everton game , should Everton had been awarded that penalty ? I assume you have not seen this question Willo out of politeness to you . If you have seen the question I assume you think the ref in the Leicester game was correct even though it was a blatant penalty. I only asked the question just to check if you blindly always say the ref is correct in every game or just the Palace games . Nothing wrong in that I was just checking to see if you really were just a WUM on these boards.
Alert a moderator to this post

MKCPFC

Spain/MK 30 Oct 17 12.41am

Originally posted by MKCPFC

Willo , out of interest , if you are watching the Leicester v Everton game , should Everton had been awarded that penalty ?

I assume you have not seen this question Willo out of politeness to you .

If you have seen the question I assume you think the ref in the Leicester game was correct even though it was a blatant penalty.

I only asked the question just to check if you blindly always say the ref is correct in every game or just the Palace games . Nothing wrong in that I was just checking to see if you really were just a WUM on these boards.

Alert a moderator to this post

Dangermouse Hastings 30 Oct 17 1.13am
Originally posted by braunstoneagle it only takes 30 seconds for a team to score a goal fella...dont fall into the trap of blaming everybody but ourselves. we wernt f*ed over, we f* ourselves over by being s*** quite a lot of the time, not the refs fault, its ours. Edited by braunstoneagle (29 Oct 2017 9.04pm) There's the rub. Ref does his job and we're one up and the whole game changes, but let's slag our players off for the ref failing to do his job. He probably was telling TFM there was not enough contact when he was clearly taken from behind when leading a counter attack too. That's Life And as funny as it may seem Some people get their kicks stompin' on a Dream. KEEP THE FAITH!!!!!
Alert a moderator to this post

Dangermouse

Hastings 30 Oct 17 1.13am

Originally posted by braunstoneagle

it only takes 30 seconds for a team to score a goal fella...dont fall into the trap of blaming everybody but ourselves.

we wernt f***ed over, we f*** ourselves over by being s*** quite a lot of the time, not the refs fault, its ours.

Edited by braunstoneagle (29 Oct 2017 9.04pm)

There's the rub. Ref does his job and we're one up and the whole game changes, but let's slag our players off for the ref failing to do his job.
He probably was telling TFM there was not enough contact when he was clearly taken from behind when leading a counter attack too.

That's Life
And as funny as it may seem
Some people get their kicks stompin' on a Dream.
KEEP THE FAITH!!!!!

Alert a moderator to this post

chateauferret 30 Oct 17 1.56am
Originally posted by Dangermouse There's the rub. Ref does his job and we're one up and the whole game changes, but let's slag our players off for the ref failing to do his job. He probably was telling TFM there was not enough contact when he was clearly taken from behind when leading a counter attack too. I think he just told him to f*** off, didn't he not? ============ The Ferret ============
Alert a moderator to this post

chateauferret

30 Oct 17 1.56am

Originally posted by Dangermouse

I think he just told him to f*** off, didn't he not?

============
The Ferret
============

Alert a moderator to this post

the silurian The garden of England.(not really) 30 Oct 17 6.33am
Originally posted by MKCPFC I assume you have not seen this question Willo out of politeness to you . If you have seen the question I assume you think the ref in the Leicester game was correct even though it was a blatant penalty. I only asked the question just to check if you blindly always say the ref is correct in every game or just the Palace games . Nothing wrong in that I was just checking to see if you really were just a WUM on these boards. According to his posts, Willo believes that the refereee is ALWAYS right, never makes anything other than an HONEST mistake (whatever that is) and are completely fair and unbiased. Utter piffle and hogwash, check out his record with Wilf..gives him nothing ever, allowed Huddersfield to assault Wilf all game , leading to Wilfs 5 game abscence, and blatantly turns down penalty appeals if its Wilf involved. Anywhere else on the pitch that was a foul, if madeley hasnt got the balls to give it as a foul he shouldnt be refereeing....he is Clattenf*** Mk2 !
Alert a moderator to this post

the silurian

The garden of England.(not really) 30 Oct 17 6.33am

Originally posted by MKCPFC

I assume you have not seen this question Willo out of politeness to you .

If you have seen the question I assume you think the ref in the Leicester game was correct even though it was a blatant penalty.

According to his posts, Willo believes that the refereee is ALWAYS right, never makes anything other than an HONEST mistake (whatever that is) and are completely fair and unbiased. Utter piffle and hogwash, check out his record with Wilf..gives him nothing ever, allowed Huddersfield to assault Wilf all game , leading to Wilfs 5 game abscence, and blatantly turns down penalty appeals if its Wilf involved. Anywhere else on the pitch that was a foul, if madeley hasnt got the balls to give it as a foul he shouldnt be refereeing....he is Clattenf*** Mk2 !

Alert a moderator to this post

Nobbybm Dartford 30 Oct 17 8.28am
I thought he was as poor as always, but equally to both teams. He does seem to miss a few of the more recent changes to the rules though. After Zabaleta went through TFM he was booked yet Madley made TFM leave the field of play afterwards. Didn't impact on the game as such, but could have & the rule change earlier this year was stated as: “If a player is injured from a challenge which is punished by a red or yellow card, he can have quick treatment on the field of play and does not have to leave. It always seemed unfair that the victim team was down to 10 men and the guilty team has 11 against 10.” IF our free kick had been cleared quickly & they'd scored ion the counter because our full back was off the pitch it could've had a serious impact on the result. Small detail but top level refs should know them. Will this be five? It's gonna be five! It IS five!
Alert a moderator to this post

Nobbybm

Dartford 30 Oct 17 8.28am

I thought he was as poor as always, but equally to both teams.

He does seem to miss a few of the more recent changes to the rules though. After Zabaleta went through TFM he was booked yet Madley made TFM leave the field of play afterwards. Didn't impact on the game as such, but could have & the rule change earlier this year was stated as:

“If a player is injured from a challenge which is punished by a red or yellow card, he can have quick treatment on the field of play and does not have to leave. It always seemed unfair that the victim team was down to 10 men and the guilty team has 11 against 10.”

IF our free kick had been cleared quickly & they'd scored ion the counter because our full back was off the pitch it could've had a serious impact on the result.

Small detail but top level refs should know them.

Will this be five? It's gonna be five! It IS five!

Alert a moderator to this post

Hutchyeagle Hove 30 Oct 17 8.39am
Did anyone else ,notice.... In the second half the ref awarded a couple of free kicks to West Ham. He stepped out 12 steps to position the wall for them...Cabaye’s free kick (joe hart unbelievable save) I counted 9 steps from him Just the most basic errors (almost dodgy)
Alert a moderator to this post

Hutchyeagle

Hove 30 Oct 17 8.39am

Did anyone else ,notice....
In the second half the ref awarded a couple of free kicks to West Ham. He stepped out 12 steps to position the wall for them...Cabaye’s free kick (joe hart unbelievable save) I counted 9 steps from him
Just the most basic errors (almost dodgy)

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 4 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Ref for west ham

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors