Awise Sir Woy

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Awise Sir Woy

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 4 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Midlands Eagle 16 Oct 17 2.09pm
Originally posted by chateauferret Seemed to be perfectly OK to refer to his predecessor as "De Bore", though. Funny that. Perhaps different rules apply if you're s***e? So far as I can recall that was just one dickhead who thought that he was being funny so he kept on repeating his side splitting joke. I do wonder whether any of these keyboard warriors would call him Woy to his face or is it just hiding behind anonymity on the internet that they become daring
Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle

16 Oct 17 2.09pm

Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by chateauferret

Seemed to be perfectly OK to refer to his predecessor as "De Bore", though. Funny that. Perhaps different rules apply if you're s***e?

So far as I can recall that was just one dickhead who thought that he was being funny so he kept on repeating his side splitting joke.

I do wonder whether any of these keyboard warriors would call him Woy to his face or is it just hiding behind anonymity on the internet that they become daring

Alert a moderator to this post

cpfc1976 Reading 16 Oct 17 2.12pm
Originally posted by chateauferret I thought the purpose of the thread heading was to appreciate the job he did on Chelsea on Saturday, but YMMV. I'd be surprised if Hodgson gave a toss about people referring to him as "Woy" on some internet forum somewhere. Seemed to be perfectly OK to refer to his predecessor as "De Bore", though. Funny that. Perhaps different rules apply if you're s*e? And they're still broadcasting the Only Fools and Horses epsiode about Tony Angelino who can't sing songs with Rs in them. It was on UK Gold the other week.** Edited by chateauferret (16 Oct 2017 1.44pm) Great point. I also wonder if the Frosties advert mocked stuttering? If it did its surely yet another sign that we should definitely continue to take the piss out of our manager, because that was on TV too. Hopefully someone can start another thread mocking his speech impediment after the Newcastle game, it's simply hilarious.
Alert a moderator to this post

cpfc1976

Reading 16 Oct 17 2.12pm

Originally posted by chateauferret

I thought the purpose of the thread heading was to appreciate the job he did on Chelsea on Saturday, but YMMV.

I'd be surprised if Hodgson gave a toss about people referring to him as "Woy" on some internet forum somewhere.

Seemed to be perfectly OK to refer to his predecessor as "De Bore", though. Funny that. Perhaps different rules apply if you're s***e?

And they're still broadcasting the Only Fools and Horses epsiode about Tony Angelino who can't sing songs with Rs in them. It was on UK Gold the other week.

Edited by chateauferret (16 Oct 2017 1.44pm)

Great point.

I also wonder if the Frosties advert mocked stuttering? If it did its surely yet another sign that we should definitely continue to take the piss out of our manager, because that was on TV too.

Hopefully someone can start another thread mocking his speech impediment after the Newcastle game, it's simply hilarious.

Alert a moderator to this post

Park Road 16 Oct 17 2.14pm
Originally posted by deflemonkid If you replace the "man" with an actual person then is it still a joke or is it a mean spirited attack on some poor fella who's had his arms amputated? Its not about being politically correct its about not being an ass. Roys just pulled of a minor miracle in turning around the team from what we saw at old trafford to sat afternoon and instead of giving him the plaudits he deserves guys still come on here and make fun of him. And the fact that the sun and big bang theory employ these methods of "wit' should be a surefire indicator that it aint funny at all. Doctors do it about their patients, soldiers about their colleagues.including using names Its a coping mechanism. Are they being arses? Or USA asses
Alert a moderator to this post

Park Road

16 Oct 17 2.14pm

Originally posted by deflemonkid

If you replace the "man" with an actual person then is it still a joke or is it a mean spirited attack on some poor fella who's had his arms amputated?

Its not about being politically correct its about not being an ass. Roys just pulled of a minor miracle in turning around the team from what we saw at old trafford to sat afternoon and instead of giving him the plaudits he deserves guys still come on here and make fun of him.

And the fact that the sun and big bang theory employ these methods of "wit' should be a surefire indicator that it aint funny at all.

Doctors do it about their patients, soldiers about their colleagues.including using names
Its a coping mechanism.
Are they being arses? Or USA asses

Alert a moderator to this post

coulsdoneagle London 16 Oct 17 2.23pm
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle So far as I can recall that was just one dickhead who thought that he was being funny so he kept on repeating his side splitting joke. I do wonder whether any of these keyboard warriors would call him Woy to his face or is it just hiding behind anonymity on the internet that they become daring Id add that the difference is that De Boer didn't have a disability other that a football management impediment, which as far as I'm aware is fair game. It's not the same as making fun of someone with a speech problem that has zero impact on his ability to manage palace. Calling him Woy is a personal attack, whether you do it in jest or not, it isn't really your call.
Alert a moderator to this post

coulsdoneagle

London 16 Oct 17 2.23pm

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

So far as I can recall that was just one dickhead who thought that he was being funny so he kept on repeating his side splitting joke.

I do wonder whether any of these keyboard warriors would call him Woy to his face or is it just hiding behind anonymity on the internet that they become daring

Id add that the difference is that De Boer didn't have a disability other that a football management impediment, which as far as I'm aware is fair game. It's not the same as making fun of someone with a speech problem that has zero impact on his ability to manage palace. Calling him Woy is a personal attack, whether you do it in jest or not, it isn't really your call.

Alert a moderator to this post

deflemonkid 16 Oct 17 2.26pm
Originally posted by Park Road Doctors do it about their patients, soldiers about their colleagues.including using names Its a coping mechanism. Are they being arses? Or USA asses Yes they are being arses and asses in equal measure. Saying it behind their patients or colleagues back is mean and to their face is just cruel. But Just cos someone else does something doesn't make it ok. I'm sure growing up we all had someone ask us if your best mate jumped off a cliff would you do it too?
Alert a moderator to this post

deflemonkid

16 Oct 17 2.26pm

Originally posted by Park Road

Doctors do it about their patients, soldiers about their colleagues.including using names
Its a coping mechanism.
Are they being arses? Or USA asses

Yes they are being arses and asses in equal measure. Saying it behind their patients or colleagues back is mean and to their face is just cruel.

But Just cos someone else does something doesn't make it ok. I'm sure growing up we all had someone ask us if your best mate jumped off a cliff would you do it too?

Alert a moderator to this post

Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 16 Oct 17 2.28pm
a swallow does not make a Summer. But it makes a damn fine BJ Everyone stepped up a few gears. Well done Roy. I disengage, I turn the page.
Alert a moderator to this post

Forest Hillbilly

in a hidey-hole 16 Oct 17 2.28pm

Send a Private Message to Forest Hillbilly

a swallow does not make a Summer.

But it makes a damn fine BJ

Everyone stepped up a few gears.

Well done Roy.

I disengage, I turn the page.

Alert a moderator to this post

Park Road 16 Oct 17 2.34pm
Originally posted by deflemonkid Yes they are being arses and asses in equal measure. Saying it behind their patients or colleagues back is mean and to their face is just cruel. But Just cos someone else does something doesn't make it ok. I'm sure growing up we all had someone ask us if your best mate jumped off a cliff would you do it too? Doctors yes do it behind their backs, but soldiers do it openly and to the colleague directly. What I never understand is why you and so many others on here feel the need to name call? In your case arses and asses respectively another one on here has used the word f&cling d%ck etc..all to people you don't and probably never will know. Now call me a bleeding heart but aren't you being offensive?
Alert a moderator to this post

Park Road

16 Oct 17 2.34pm

Originally posted by deflemonkid

Yes they are being arses and asses in equal measure. Saying it behind their patients or colleagues back is mean and to their face is just cruel.

But Just cos someone else does something doesn't make it ok. I'm sure growing up we all had someone ask us if your best mate jumped off a cliff would you do it too?

Doctors yes do it behind their backs, but soldiers do it openly and to the colleague directly.
What I never understand is why you and so many others on here feel the need to name call? In your case arses and asses respectively another one on here has used the word f&cling d%ck etc..all to people you don't and probably never will know.

Now call me a bleeding heart but aren't you being offensive?

Alert a moderator to this post

deflemonkid 16 Oct 17 3.44pm
Originally posted by Park Road Doctors yes do it behind their backs, but soldiers do it openly and to the colleague directly. What I never understand is why you and so many others on here feel the need to name call? In your case arses and asses respectively another one on here has used the word f&cling d%ck etc..all to people you don't and probably never will know. Now call me a bleeding heart but aren't you being offensive? I'm not name calling, i'm using descriptive terms based on their behavior. That is in line with personal choice and something completely within their own control. If you cant see the difference in that and making fun of someone's speech impediment or amputated arms then there's really not much more i care to say to you. Edited by deflemonkid (16 Oct 2017 3.44pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

deflemonkid

16 Oct 17 3.44pm

Originally posted by Park Road

Now call me a bleeding heart but aren't you being offensive?

I'm not name calling, i'm using descriptive terms based on their behavior. That is in line with personal choice and something completely within their own control.

If you cant see the difference in that and making fun of someone's speech impediment or amputated arms then there's really not much more i care to say to you.

Edited by deflemonkid (16 Oct 2017 3.44pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Park Road 16 Oct 17 3.51pm
Originally posted by deflemonkid I'm not name calling, i'm using descriptive terms based on their behavior. That is in line with personal choice and something completely within their own control. If you cant see the difference in that and making fun of someone's speech impediment or amputated arms then there's really not much more i care to say to you. Edited by deflemonkid (16 Oct 2017 3.44pm) 1.That's what you say. 2.That's you being touchy and loosing the argument. So, I bid you good day sir
Alert a moderator to this post

Park Road

16 Oct 17 3.51pm

Originally posted by deflemonkid

I'm not name calling, i'm using descriptive terms based on their behavior. That is in line with personal choice and something completely within their own control.

If you cant see the difference in that and making fun of someone's speech impediment or amputated arms then there's really not much more i care to say to you.

Edited by deflemonkid (16 Oct 2017 3.44pm)

1.That's what you say.
2.That's you being touchy and loosing the argument.
So, I bid you good day sir

Alert a moderator to this post

deflemonkid 16 Oct 17 3.58pm
Originally posted by Park Road 1.That's what you say. 2.That's you being touchy and loosing the argument. So, I bid you good day sir 1. Of course thats what i say. Its there in black and white (and now bold thanks to you) 2. Its more or a response to not caring to run round in circles for hours with you arguing the same point but feel free to interpret it whichever way make you feel more comfortable. Good day to you too. Edited by deflemonkid (16 Oct 2017 3.58pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

deflemonkid

16 Oct 17 3.58pm

Originally posted by Park Road

1.That's what you say.
2.That's you being touchy and loosing the argument.
So, I bid you good day sir

1. Of course thats what i say. Its there in black and white (and now bold thanks to you)

2. Its more or a response to not caring to run round in circles for hours with you arguing the same point but feel free to interpret it whichever way make you feel more comfortable.

Good day to you too.

Edited by deflemonkid (16 Oct 2017 3.58pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Brentmiester_General Front line in the battle against t... 16 Oct 17 4.16pm
Originally posted by deflemonkid Have you seen it without the laugh track? its actually painful [Link] I've seen about 30 seconds of it and that was painful enough. "We love you Palace, we f@cking hate Man U, We love you Palace, we hate the brighton too, We love you Palace we play in red 'n' blue, so f@ck you, and you ...
Alert a moderator to this post

Brentmiester_General

Front line in the battle against t... 16 Oct 17 4.16pm

Originally posted by deflemonkid

Have you seen it without the laugh track? its actually painful

[Link]

I've seen about 30 seconds of it and that was painful enough.

"We love you Palace, we f@cking hate Man U, We love you Palace, we hate the brighton too, We love you Palace we play in red 'n' blue, so f@ck you, and you ...

Alert a moderator to this post

est1905 16 Oct 17 4.19pm
Originally posted by ex hibitionist I got hammered a while back for the same mistake, funny, when he got the England job the Sun made the same mistake ('Now for the Euwos') - just think this is silly banter, appreciate and respect the moral viewpoint of the posters here, but at the same time we don't want to take ourselves too seriously. Agree, 1. I doubt RH looks at HOL. 2. If he did I doubt he'd be overly offended. 3. the O/P was just have a bit of fun at Rh expense (may not be particularly funny but hardly a hanging offence) Too many precious souls on here take deliberate offence over something that doesn't even have any impact on them personally whatsoever. A lesson for the PC brigade, tolerance extends to those you disapprove of as well as those that you do. Or we could just turn full into a nanny state and ban anything remotely offensive to anyone, ever! I wonder how that would work inside football stadiums.
Alert a moderator to this post

est1905

16 Oct 17 4.19pm

Originally posted by ex hibitionist

I got hammered a while back for the same mistake, funny, when he got the England job the Sun made the same mistake ('Now for the Euwos') - just think this is silly banter, appreciate and respect the moral viewpoint of the posters here, but at the same time we don't want to take ourselves too seriously.

Agree, 1. I doubt RH looks at HOL. 2. If he did I doubt he'd be overly offended. 3. the O/P was just have a bit of fun at Rh expense (may not be particularly funny but hardly a hanging offence)
Too many precious souls on here take deliberate offence over something that doesn't even have any impact on them personally whatsoever.
A lesson for the PC brigade, tolerance extends to those you disapprove of as well as those that you do.
Or we could just turn full into a nanny state and ban anything remotely offensive to anyone, ever! I wonder how that would work inside football stadiums.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 4 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Awise Sir Woy

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors