You are here: Home > Message Board > General Talk > Elon Musk
November 23 2024 12.51am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Elon Musk

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

  

.TUX. Flag 16 Oct 17 7.52am

Originally posted by Lyons550


Its not all Govt's money...it was at the start and clearly the Govt are one of his biggest customers with Space X but he is also putting a massive amount of his own money into these projects.

Not at all, the tax-payer subsidies continue.

 


Buy Litecoin.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Midlands Eagle Flag 16 Oct 17 9.02am Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by .TUX.

Not at all, the tax-payer subsidies continue.

That's a change of stance from you as originally you implied that it was all Government money.

What's wrong with tax payers subsidising new and exciting technology after all it seems that they are subsidising a lot of our aerospace industry.

Would you care to explain why you have it in for Mr Musk

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Ray in Houston Flag Houston 16 Oct 17 4.13pm Send a Private Message to Ray in Houston Add Ray in Houston as a friend


That it NOT an oil sands site in Alberta. This is. Truth matters.

9422815253_a7c61737c2.jpg Attachment: 9422815253_a7c61737c2.jpg (139.03Kb)

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Ray in Houston Flag Houston 16 Oct 17 5.00pm Send a Private Message to Ray in Houston Add Ray in Houston as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

That's a change of stance from you as originally you implied that it was all Government money.

What's wrong with tax payers subsidising new and exciting technology after all it seems that they are subsidising a lot of our aerospace industry.

Would you care to explain why you have it in for Mr Musk


Tax-payers subsidise ALL industries. Our taxes pay for the roads they use to ship goods, the police that protect them and their goods from criminals, the fire fighters who will respond if their building catches fire, healthcare (outside the US, at least) to keep their workers healthy and productive, and education to ensure that there is an educated workforce available to employ. This doesn't even include the military who protects everyone from international threats.

On top of this, a bit of research money to help along a new idea is a drop in the bucket. If people want to complain about subsidies, they should start with the big stuff, not the minutiae of individual grants.

Oh, and the biggest recipient of government subsidies? The oil industry. I had a client whose business model was entirely predicated on taking a tax break for drilling costs that meant that 85 cents of every dollar spent on drilling was tax-deductible. If they strike oil (as they do almost 100% of the time now due to greatly enhanced seismic technology) they pay taxes on the profits, of course, but never have to repay the drilling cost deductible.

So US taxpayers are subsidizing 85% of the drilling costs of Exxon et al. Drill, baby! Drill.

Edited by Ray in Houston (16 Oct 2017 5.01pm)

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
npn Flag Crowborough 16 Oct 17 5.12pm Send a Private Message to npn Add npn as a friend

Originally posted by Ray in Houston


That it NOT an oil sands site in Alberta. This is. Truth matters.

And even if it were, how pretty the area of extraction looks is a tiny part of the issue with carbon-based energy - it's the pollution caused when you burn it, knock-on problems of extraction and transport (oil-slicks and the like) and then the question of what to do when it runs out (taking on more and more risky extraction projects such as deep water drilling and I won't even mention fracking as I'm still undecided on the environmental impact).

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Ray in Houston Flag Houston 16 Oct 17 5.28pm Send a Private Message to Ray in Houston Add Ray in Houston as a friend

Originally posted by npn

And even if it were, how pretty the area of extraction looks is a tiny part of the issue with carbon-based energy - it's the pollution caused when you burn it, knock-on problems of extraction and transport (oil-slicks and the like) and then the question of what to do when it runs out (taking on more and more risky extraction projects such as deep water drilling and I won't even mention fracking as I'm still undecided on the environmental impact).


There's a lot of hullaballoo about fracking - most of which is garbage. If you see a video of a guy in Appalachia setting fire to his tap water, it's because he lives on top of thick coal seams that produce methane that leaches into the ground water. It's been like that ever since they started putting down water wells - i.e. over 100 years. Shale gas/oil is thousands of feet below those coal seams and is not the cause of such a party trick.

The real issues with fracking are:

a) The horrendous waste of water, especially as it is typically disposed of by being pumped down disused wells that may be having the effect of lubricating fault lines;

b) The increased amounts of methane released during the process (methane being a significantly worse greenhouse gas than CO2); and

c) The fact that it's producing fossil fuels.

Given that, until Musk gets his s*** together, we need fossil fuels to move around and keep the lights on, we can skip (c). I'm not sure what can be done about (b) - maybe better equipment to capture more methane.

I think (a) is fixed more simply by forcing recycling rather than disposal of water. The technology exists, but it's cheaper to dispose of the water than reuse it, so this is what happens. Moving all that water around - bringing in fresh in addition to shipping out the used - adds to truck traffic on the roads, which increases the carbon footprint of the operation, damages the roads themselves and has been the cause of numerous accidents - many of which have been deadly (and thus expensive). [Link]

Bottom line, though: the direct impact of fracking is no worse than conventional oil drilling, and its practice in the US was the catalyst for the oil price collapse which has lowered energy costs around the world. It's the water, and what they do with it when they're done with it, that's the problem.

Edited by Ray in Houston (16 Oct 2017 8.12pm)

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
.TUX. Flag 16 Oct 17 6.27pm

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

That's a change of stance from you as originally you implied that it was all Government money.

What's wrong with tax payers subsidising new and exciting technology after all it seems that they are subsidising a lot of our aerospace industry.

Would you care to explain why you have it in for Mr Musk

A large part of it. Sorry for any misunderstanding.

And i have nothing against Elon, i just don't think he's 'all that' tbh. Equally i don't believe we need any extra funding towards space 'exploration/travel', well not at the moment anyway, we have far bigger problems that need addressing.

 


Buy Litecoin.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 16 Oct 17 6.39pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by .TUX.

A large part of it. Sorry for any misunderstanding.

And i have nothing against Elon, i just don't think he's 'all that' tbh. Equally i don't believe we need any extra funding towards space 'exploration/travel', well not at the moment anyway, we have far bigger problems that need addressing.

Like what?

Nasa's budget is puny compared to when it was working towards traveling to the moon.

It's one percent now....Private companies like SpaceX are another part of the puzzle.....Humanity needs to eventually get off this planet.

If you cede space research to non western entities there is no knowing what technologies they will get to first.

Countries like India are our good friends.....but space research is enlarging around the world.


Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Oct 2017 6.43pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
.TUX. Flag 16 Oct 17 9.05pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Like what?

Nasa's budget is puny compared to when it was working towards traveling to the moon.

It's one percent now....Private companies like SpaceX are another part of the puzzle.....Humanity needs to eventually get off this planet.

If you cede space research to non western entities there is no knowing what technologies they will get to first.

Countries like India are our good friends.....but space research is enlarging around the world.


Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Oct 2017 6.43pm)

.

 


Buy Litecoin.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Bin Liner Flag London , Southfields 06 Nov 17 9.23am Send a Private Message to Bin Liner Add Bin Liner as a friend

love these little piccies

23172943_10159584942625603_7944252881192549474_n.jpg Attachment: 23172943_10159584942625603_7944252881192549474_n.jpg (52.10Kb)

 


Portillo's teeth removed to boost pound

Boy roasts himself in sacrifice to Chris Kelly

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 06 Nov 17 9.40am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Bin Liner

love these little piccies

There is something to this in countries where the main energy is coming from coal.

However, in most of Europe electric cars, well-to-wheel, will emit 25% less carbon dioxide over its lifetime than a diesel car.

[Link]

Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Nov 2017 9.41am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Bin Liner Flag London , Southfields 06 Nov 17 10.05am Send a Private Message to Bin Liner Add Bin Liner as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

There is something to this in countries where the main energy is coming from coal.

However, in most of Europe electric cars, well-to-wheel, will emit 25% less carbon dioxide over its lifetime than a diesel car.

[Link]

Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Nov 2017 9.41am)

one thing that perturbs me and we all probably saw the news items in the last few months of the dreadful conditions that these young kids are being are being forced to work in these cobalt mines, the very mines where the cobalt is needed to power the EV revolution, the hemp wearing, lentil chomping, latte quaffing limp wristed,left wing liberals all seem to be noticeably quiet when these kind of things are exposed, weird, not surprising though.

 


Portillo's teeth removed to boost pound

Boy roasts himself in sacrifice to Chris Kelly

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 4 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > General Talk > Elon Musk