This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
.TUX. 16 Oct 17 7.52am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lyons550
Not at all, the tax-payer subsidies continue.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 16 Oct 17 9.02am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by .TUX.
Not at all, the tax-payer subsidies continue. That's a change of stance from you as originally you implied that it was all Government money. What's wrong with tax payers subsidising new and exciting technology after all it seems that they are subsidising a lot of our aerospace industry. Would you care to explain why you have it in for Mr Musk
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ray in Houston Houston 16 Oct 17 4.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Bin Liner
Attachment: 9422815253_a7c61737c2.jpg (139.03Kb)
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ray in Houston Houston 16 Oct 17 5.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
That's a change of stance from you as originally you implied that it was all Government money. What's wrong with tax payers subsidising new and exciting technology after all it seems that they are subsidising a lot of our aerospace industry. Would you care to explain why you have it in for Mr Musk
On top of this, a bit of research money to help along a new idea is a drop in the bucket. If people want to complain about subsidies, they should start with the big stuff, not the minutiae of individual grants. Oh, and the biggest recipient of government subsidies? The oil industry. I had a client whose business model was entirely predicated on taking a tax break for drilling costs that meant that 85 cents of every dollar spent on drilling was tax-deductible. If they strike oil (as they do almost 100% of the time now due to greatly enhanced seismic technology) they pay taxes on the profits, of course, but never have to repay the drilling cost deductible. So US taxpayers are subsidizing 85% of the drilling costs of Exxon et al. Drill, baby! Drill. Edited by Ray in Houston (16 Oct 2017 5.01pm)
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
npn Crowborough 16 Oct 17 5.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
And even if it were, how pretty the area of extraction looks is a tiny part of the issue with carbon-based energy - it's the pollution caused when you burn it, knock-on problems of extraction and transport (oil-slicks and the like) and then the question of what to do when it runs out (taking on more and more risky extraction projects such as deep water drilling and I won't even mention fracking as I'm still undecided on the environmental impact).
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Ray in Houston Houston 16 Oct 17 5.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by npn
And even if it were, how pretty the area of extraction looks is a tiny part of the issue with carbon-based energy - it's the pollution caused when you burn it, knock-on problems of extraction and transport (oil-slicks and the like) and then the question of what to do when it runs out (taking on more and more risky extraction projects such as deep water drilling and I won't even mention fracking as I'm still undecided on the environmental impact).
The real issues with fracking are: a) The horrendous waste of water, especially as it is typically disposed of by being pumped down disused wells that may be having the effect of lubricating fault lines; b) The increased amounts of methane released during the process (methane being a significantly worse greenhouse gas than CO2); and c) The fact that it's producing fossil fuels. Given that, until Musk gets his s*** together, we need fossil fuels to move around and keep the lights on, we can skip (c). I'm not sure what can be done about (b) - maybe better equipment to capture more methane. I think (a) is fixed more simply by forcing recycling rather than disposal of water. The technology exists, but it's cheaper to dispose of the water than reuse it, so this is what happens. Moving all that water around - bringing in fresh in addition to shipping out the used - adds to truck traffic on the roads, which increases the carbon footprint of the operation, damages the roads themselves and has been the cause of numerous accidents - many of which have been deadly (and thus expensive). [Link] Bottom line, though: the direct impact of fracking is no worse than conventional oil drilling, and its practice in the US was the catalyst for the oil price collapse which has lowered energy costs around the world. It's the water, and what they do with it when they're done with it, that's the problem. Edited by Ray in Houston (16 Oct 2017 8.12pm)
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 16 Oct 17 6.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
That's a change of stance from you as originally you implied that it was all Government money. What's wrong with tax payers subsidising new and exciting technology after all it seems that they are subsidising a lot of our aerospace industry. Would you care to explain why you have it in for Mr Musk A large part of it. Sorry for any misunderstanding. And i have nothing against Elon, i just don't think he's 'all that' tbh. Equally i don't believe we need any extra funding towards space 'exploration/travel', well not at the moment anyway, we have far bigger problems that need addressing.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 16 Oct 17 6.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by .TUX.
A large part of it. Sorry for any misunderstanding. And i have nothing against Elon, i just don't think he's 'all that' tbh. Equally i don't believe we need any extra funding towards space 'exploration/travel', well not at the moment anyway, we have far bigger problems that need addressing. Like what? Nasa's budget is puny compared to when it was working towards traveling to the moon. It's one percent now....Private companies like SpaceX are another part of the puzzle.....Humanity needs to eventually get off this planet. If you cede space research to non western entities there is no knowing what technologies they will get to first. Countries like India are our good friends.....but space research is enlarging around the world.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 16 Oct 17 9.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Like what? Nasa's budget is puny compared to when it was working towards traveling to the moon. It's one percent now....Private companies like SpaceX are another part of the puzzle.....Humanity needs to eventually get off this planet. If you cede space research to non western entities there is no knowing what technologies they will get to first. Countries like India are our good friends.....but space research is enlarging around the world.
.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Bin Liner London , Southfields 06 Nov 17 9.23am | |
---|---|
love these little piccies Attachment: 23172943_10159584942625603_7944252881192549474_n.jpg (52.10Kb)
Portillo's teeth removed to boost pound Boy roasts himself in sacrifice to Chris Kelly |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 06 Nov 17 9.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Bin Liner
love these little piccies There is something to this in countries where the main energy is coming from coal. However, in most of Europe electric cars, well-to-wheel, will emit 25% less carbon dioxide over its lifetime than a diesel car. Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Nov 2017 9.41am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Bin Liner London , Southfields 06 Nov 17 10.05am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
There is something to this in countries where the main energy is coming from coal. However, in most of Europe electric cars, well-to-wheel, will emit 25% less carbon dioxide over its lifetime than a diesel car. Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Nov 2017 9.41am) one thing that perturbs me and we all probably saw the news items in the last few months of the dreadful conditions that these young kids are being are being forced to work in these cobalt mines, the very mines where the cobalt is needed to power the EV revolution, the hemp wearing, lentil chomping, latte quaffing limp wristed,left wing liberals all seem to be noticeably quiet when these kind of things are exposed, weird, not surprising though.
Portillo's teeth removed to boost pound Boy roasts himself in sacrifice to Chris Kelly |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.